CatYaaak
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2002
- Posts
- 809
flydog said:This should serve as a wake up call to those fickle minded whores that think they can just plop down 50k and become a professional pilot. There are no shortcuts in life. In my opinion you all deserve what you get.
No one in their right mind should fork over money up front for ANYTHING and that includes an education if what ATA provided can be called that.
Well, I forked over money up front prior to every semester of education at UND, where I also earned some of my ratings. I guess that makes me a crazy, "fickle-minded whore" also. Imagine, me thinking that paying for those ratings and degree would help me become a professional pilot. I also busted my butt working in order to be able to afford to do that.
Where is the so-called "shortcut" you accuse these students of taking? My understanding is that ATA was a flight school where one earned ratings, not an ab initio pay-for-a-guaranteed job program. So what if the school had some kind of networking agreement connections at ASA? Even back in the 80s many commuter airlines etc. looked at UND grads (like a lot of other schools), and even if most of those connections weren't "official" at that time, they were very real. This issue is about fraud; students/customers being bilked out of money for TRAINING (not a job) they were promised and will never receive, by people who most likely knew they couldn't deliver at the time they took the money. It's not a pay-for-a-job debate, as much as you'd like it to be.
Flydog, didn't you pay for your initial training and ratings? If so, then that makes you just as much of a whore as any student at that flight school.