Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airline pilot pay

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
How about these numbers for some statistics.

In the United States...

Average income per household: $46,325
Average income per household with two income earners: $67,348

Average income, males 25 or older: $33,517
Average income, females 25 or older: $19,679

Average salary with high school: $26,505
Avereage salary with bachelor's degree: $43,143
Average salary with some college: $31,04
Average salary with masters degree: $52,390
Average salary with PhD: $70,853

Since 2004, salaries are down 4%


Source for these numbers?
 
As much as it sucks to hear some of the payscales at some of the regionals, everything breaks down into supply and demand. Big supply of pilots, not very high demand = low pay. Unfortunately it's economics 101, and people DO have the option of not flying.

And as for the big supply of pilots, can people really be blamed? It is (was?) a VERY desirable profession. How many other jobs can someone with no college fly a 20+ million dollar jet, and realistically make $70,000+ and have 16 days off a month? There's thousands of more crappy jobs out there.

I guess the only way pay will really change (for the better) is if the supply of pilots REALLY dries up. From what I hear many flight schools are hurting for business, so maybe we're inching closer to that?
 
I think we're missing Pilotontherise's larger point in the clamor of people screaming "we're underpayed" and "no way this job rocks!" College may not be necessary for a shiney jetjob, but I think middle school still is, so I imagine that everyone is familiar with the concept of supply and demand, and needs no remedial education. Agreed, yes, the issue is not "what we deserve", but what we're able to negotiate. On a micro scale, that holds water. However, in a labor market that is completley controlled by political considerations, free market aphorisms do not apply. If the company can abrogate its contracts more or less at will by utilizing the RLA after a shell-game sham bankruptcy (Mesaba), or create an alter-ego at will towards the same goal (TSA/GoJets), the natural balance of powers in a free-market economy is crippled.

This is what makes me beat my head against a wall when people say "get another job". The stratification of incomes in the United States has been increasing for decades, but only now are we seeing the result of this stratification. The working class are becoming destitute "droogs", of essentially no redeeming social value at all, other than being warm bodies in the seats of wal-marts and burger-kings. Formerly middle class jobs (like, say, ours) are becoming working class "cash the check to make the mortgage and buy the groceries" wage-slave positions. And then, at the top, absurd salaries for "talent players" are more and more the norm. Even the polticos do not in essence dispute this. Read the numbers of H-1s issued for jobs which Americans really CAN'T do. They simply lack the will to do anything about it (or some would say the ability, given that they are beholden to the same idiot electorate that failed 5th grade and votes based on ridiculously vague "statements of purpose" and the ability to "feel their pain".) All of these problems are chickens that were hatched thirty, forty, and fifty years ago, and are only now coming home to roost.

This is why it is inane to blame "teh boosh" for the latest round of economic stratification. You might just as well blame Clinton. Or Bush. Or Reagan. Or Carter. Like all national crises, it occured in small increments, largely on ground given to win back ground lost.

What IS clear is that radical steps are required to dope-slap america out of the rapidly escalating cycle of economic self-destruction in which we find ourselves. And not just politically or economically, but morally. My own preference would be that the "moral" angle not be religiously affiliated, but rather a simple re-affirmation, from the grassroots level, that there is more beautiful and sacred about life than being able to afford (on credit, of course) the latest flat panel big screen or Lexus. If that makes me a hippie, spray me tie-dye. That's not to say that pilots oughtn't be paid well, but that what qualifies as "paid well" often has a lot more to do with quality of life than with raw numbers.

For those who believe that we live in a free market (if any of you made it this far), read DeTocqueville, a classic (and deservedly so) on the nature of our Republic. Pay particular attention to the necessity of a vibrant and thinking middle class. Then ask yourself whether, if current trends continue, the future is likely to hold more or less of one.
 
Last edited:
Rip,

Wow! Awesome post!

Finally, someone who gets it.

Peace.

Rekks
 
Good post Rip.. in the end, the fact that a free market is operating doesn't make it a moral outcome. Adam Smith also wrote of the "Tyranny of the Free Market" ... there is a balance.

Also, as long as the profession is being peddled by the likes of the AOPA, AirInc, ATA, and other alphabet soup aviation lobbies/interest groups as easily attainable so long as you've got $75,000 to throw at buying the privilege of dawning a pilots uniform, we'll always get bottom dwellers that either switch careers as they're board or frustrated with their current one, or directionless wonderers that decide "I can fly and make a lot of $$ at UAL one day cause my Uncle did.." as an old CFI I worked with said was his reason for going into aviation.. and these incremental additions to the supply of pilots will keep wages depressed.
 
Marxist thought that the purest form of communism will happen in a capitalistic state. ie: walmart world

And i don't think Mesa or other regionals are much different than walmart. Rock bottom prices, crappy service and employees that are paid poverty wages.
 
Marxist thought that the purest form of communism will happen in a capitalistic state. ie: walmart world

And i don't think Mesa or other regionals are much different than walmart. Rock bottom prices, crappy service and employees that are paid poverty wages.

Nothing like calling a spade "a spade".
 
Flying for a profession is still a good paying job, the average airline Captain income is solidly in the middle class. As stated here, the $100K range is doable, it is in the upper 10% of all incomes. I would dare to guess that the vast majority of those flying as Captains would be hard pressed to make the same income in some other field.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top