Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airbus Planes to Use Computers In Crash-Avoidance Maneuvers

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

FL420

Blues vs. Birds-Tailhook
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Posts
626
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB114868117828864620-lMyQjAxMDE2NDI4NzYyODcxWj.html

Airbus Planes to Use Computers
In Crash-Avoidance Maneuvers

By ANDY PASZTOR
May 27, 2006; Page A4

European jet maker Airbus is taking an unprecedented step to expand cockpit automation: onboard computers that will automatically maneuver jetliners to avoid midair collisions, without any pilot input.

Known for its pioneering use of computers and software to push the automation envelope, this time Airbus has decided to cross a new threshold in replacing pilot decisions with computer commands. For the first time, flight crews of Airbus planes will be instructed and trained to rely on autopilots in most cases to escape an impending crash with another airborne aircraft. Currently, all commercial pilots are required to instantly disconnect the autopilot when they get an alert of such an emergency, and manually put their plane into a climb or descent to avoid the other aircraft.

The change, which hasn't been announced yet, comes after lengthy internal Airbus debates and despite skepticism from pilot groups and even some aircraft-equipment suppliers.

In spite of significant pilot opposition, the proposed shift sets the stage for broader use of computerized safety systems down the road to protect commercial planes, business jets and other aircraft from other hazards, including flying into natural or man-made obstacles.

Airbus, a unit of European Aeronautic Defence & Space Co. and BAE Systems PLC, plans to start installing the computerized systems on its A380 superjumbo jets perhaps as soon as next year, pending regulatory approvals. It intends to gradually install them on all other Airbus aircraft, including retrofits for older models.

The proposed systems will ensure that all aircraft "respond correctly and quickly" to alerts with "less stress on the pilot [and] less potential for injury" to passengers, said Bill Bozin, a top Airbus safety official. He said some pilots now overreact to such cockpit alerts, making extreme maneuvers that can throw passengers around, and in congested airspace even end up putting the aircraft on a collision course with still other nearby planes. In rare circumstances, pilots would retain the option of turning off the autopilot and responding on their own.

The average passenger probably won't notice any difference in an emergency, but the concept already is prompting a fair bit of controversy in aviation circles. Larry Newman, a top safety official with the Air Line Pilots Association, said his group is wary because "this tends to lead to getting the pilot further and further away from the process" of responding to emergencies.

The design approach used by Airbus -- essentially trusting computers to react faster and more predictably than humans to midair alerts and then revert to normal flight -- is in stark contrast to Boeing Co.'s approach of relying on pilot judgment in all emergencies. Before Airbus publicly talked about its decision, Scott Pelton, Boeing's chief engineer for electronic systems on jetliners, said Boeing would remain "aligned with our fundamental philosophy," which "believes the captain is in charge."

Write to Andy Pasztor at [email protected]1
 
I, for one, am against taking more out of the pilot's hands. We're already given direction commands on ACAS RA's and EGPWS commands. Eurocontrol puts out a newsletter dealing with ACAS and RA's, errors and incorrect responses to commands. Therein lies the problem. Some pilots, and suprisingly controllers, aren't following the RA's given. What shocked me was the number of controllers who try to override an RA maneuver.

With that being said, letting the computer take over evasive control of the aircraft is, IMHO, NOT a good idea. The next questions, when this is mandated, imagine the cost of retrofitting all those other "non-Airbus" types!

2000Flyer
 
suen1843 said:
Hmmmm. A computer being used to run away from trouble. Sounds like a french solution.
Objects closing in on each other at 1,000 miles an hour are probably better off left to computers.

Do you think that Anti-Ballistic Missiles are hand guided?
 
WTF, over. DO the French suck so bad as aviators that they need a computer to fly for them? Damn....sorry.....stupid question. Please disregard.
 
Coool Hand Luke said:
WTF, over. DO the French suck so bad as aviators that they need a computer to fly for them? dang....sorry.....stupid question. Please disregard.

???
the last words of your post was "Please disregard" yet you still hit the "Submit Reply" button to post it. hmmm....hokay!
 
I wonder if pilots got this pissed off when the first autopilot got installed?

I can't fault them for wanting to make things safer, just cause I want to do it the old-fashioned way.
 
A chip here, a chip there. Little by little.


Automated pilots, automated ATC.


At least they still need janitors.

CE
 
I presume that it will have a bypass for close parallel approaches?

Hopefully it wouldn't respond to an TCAS RA in a manner contrary to breakout instructions given by the PRM controller... Not to mention the whole hand-flying the breakout requirement.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top