FmrFreightDog
Py-lote
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2003
- Posts
- 1,238
I'll just interject one thing in defense of Lear.
First of all, I've never spanked my son, mainly because I've never found it necessary. He's pretty much a perfect child. I imagine that he's saving it all up for the day he turns 16, and then we've got real problems!
However (Rez. and BVT), I also do not find in necessary to tell my peers how they should raise their children. Yes, abuse is a very serious issue and should not be tolerated.... ever. However, abuse is done out of anger and discipline is not. There is a profound difference.
I know many many people who spank their children and none of them do it out of anger. Granted, the concept of corporal punishment is a difficult one. Most people have very strong opinions on the subject, and it's doubtful that an internet debate will do much to change anyone's mind.
However, the "non-spanking" crowd in this particular debate is starting to take on a decidedly "holier-than-thou" air. The bottom line is that, until Lear's children grow up to become either Nobel Prize winners or serial killers, neither of you will really be able to prove your thinly-veiled opinions that he is a bad parent and is harming his child by choosing to spank.
To extend the debate to the "dog" issue. I have also never popped any of our dogs (and we have several). They're generally pretty well behaved. Of course, my next door neighbor's dogs are generally pretty well behaved and they were physically disciplined as puppies. Far be it for me to judge which is the better method. We just do what works for us. I imagine most other people do the same.... for their dogs and for their children.
By the way, I was physically disciplined as a child, both by my parents and by the nuns at the school I attended. I am, to this day, a devoted son and a semi-regular attendee at mass, so I fail to see how corporal punishment has, in my case, undermined any social relationship.
Or, to put the entire rant more simply, worry about your own damm kids and let Lear worry about his.
First of all, I've never spanked my son, mainly because I've never found it necessary. He's pretty much a perfect child. I imagine that he's saving it all up for the day he turns 16, and then we've got real problems!
However (Rez. and BVT), I also do not find in necessary to tell my peers how they should raise their children. Yes, abuse is a very serious issue and should not be tolerated.... ever. However, abuse is done out of anger and discipline is not. There is a profound difference.
I know many many people who spank their children and none of them do it out of anger. Granted, the concept of corporal punishment is a difficult one. Most people have very strong opinions on the subject, and it's doubtful that an internet debate will do much to change anyone's mind.
However, the "non-spanking" crowd in this particular debate is starting to take on a decidedly "holier-than-thou" air. The bottom line is that, until Lear's children grow up to become either Nobel Prize winners or serial killers, neither of you will really be able to prove your thinly-veiled opinions that he is a bad parent and is harming his child by choosing to spank.
To extend the debate to the "dog" issue. I have also never popped any of our dogs (and we have several). They're generally pretty well behaved. Of course, my next door neighbor's dogs are generally pretty well behaved and they were physically disciplined as puppies. Far be it for me to judge which is the better method. We just do what works for us. I imagine most other people do the same.... for their dogs and for their children.
By the way, I was physically disciplined as a child, both by my parents and by the nuns at the school I attended. I am, to this day, a devoted son and a semi-regular attendee at mass, so I fail to see how corporal punishment has, in my case, undermined any social relationship.
Or, to put the entire rant more simply, worry about your own damm kids and let Lear worry about his.