I also wonder why they have a cut off date of 30 years old to BECOME a pilot.
In part for some of the same reasons that other federal services have cutoff ages for pilots in various disciplines. Retirement, and fitness particular to the mission. Not many 777 captains need to be ready to punch out and escape and evade for a given period of time...whereas this is always a matter of concern for the young man in the F16.
The military also has no shortage of applicants, and has no need to extend (except by special circumstance) or waiver the age limits. You may be young enough to not know that the age, and waiverable age, has been extended several times.
Entitlement? What's ironic is that the pilots who retired at age 60 years ago gave those of you who pushed for 65 the opportunity to get where you are when you did. Yet you are "entitled" to a little more?
Me? Entitled? No. But then I'm not age 60, either. A man should be able to work as long as he's able.
Those who retired gave nobody anything. They had no choice, and acted in accordance with the law.
Those who retire now at age 65 have no choice but to retire by age 65, in accordance with the law. They might retire sooner, but cannot retire later. No need for anybody to give up anything. Age 60 retirees didn't willingly go, or choose to end their careers at 60...it was taken from them. Age 65 is a step forward, but not enough of one.
Your commentary, however, is strongly reticent of the entitlement crowd...get out of my way, old man...I want your job. Your mantra never seems to change. Greed...it's all about the greed.
No. This is a pilot board. Pilots do three things. Eat, Fly, and Bitch. If you don't like it, find another line of work.
Perhaps you eat, fly, and bitch. Some of us, myself included operate professionally, work, and enjoy a fulfilling career. I needn't find another line of work; I like this one just fine. You, apparently, do not.
So why aren't they hired? Loss of perspective? Superiority complex? Inflexible attitudes?
Your question, of course, asks why airline retirees are often unable to find work when they leave the airlines. The answer is several fold. Certainly the airline stink is a big part of it; many operators, corporate and others, have an aversion to hiring airline pilots because of their typical inability or unwillingness to do simple things like stock the airplane, file their own flightplans, or carry a customer's bag. Airline pilots who are at retirement age generally have no recent general aviation experience, or experience in type or experience outside the airline environment in quite some time. This is a detriment. Airline pilots tend to have attitudes, arrogant ones at that, which turns off many HR departments in charter and corporate offices. Airline pilots tend to fly like they're still in their 747...flaring at the wrong atltitudes, and flying the airplane as though they're still flying at the airline...and tend to think that the way they've been flying is the only way, when it's not. Airline pilots at the retirement age don't have as long to offer in the long run for an operator...and airline pilots, especially furloughed pilots, have a nasty habit of taking training and then leaving...costing operators many thousands of dollars...accordingly many operators don't like to hire airline pilots.
Noone in this career made up the age 60 rule- but it's been here for all of us since we started.
Actually, it hasn't always been age 60. You're just too young to know differently. Check your facts.
You can't actually compete, you got weak- protected by seniority- so you keep your "position" for another 5 years since "competing" would be out of the question....
You, you you.
You, of course, haven't a clue what you're talking about, or to whom you're talking. You speak as though I'm somehow to benefit from the age 65 legislation. You're wrong, of course.
So an airman still has the ability to work flying airplanes.
The physical ability, yes...and this has been my point all along. The opportunity, of course, is another matter.