Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Age 65 Impact On Attrition

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Give me a break. The Me generation had far better opportunities than any other generation ever.



yeah sure.... Its easy to say that when your generation's college could be entirely paid for by the Pell Grant.
Nowadays we graduate college with $60k+ of debt.
Your generation had the oportunity of living the "american dream" and becomming home owners...Nowadays...not so much.

Some of us have problems starting a family because we are waiting to pay of some debts (like college) and once we start getting busy, we have to go through medical procedures because nature isnt working cause we waited too long in order to be financially stable for our unborn chinldren.

If anyone is generation ME its baby boomers.
 
need some way to decrease the effect of age 65

funny how quick the age 65 got thru so quick, but yet we still have to fly on the proven unsafe and antiquated FAA rest requirements---- if they dropped them to a max 12 hour duty day for a 2 man crew , it might at least save some possible furloughees and some who collect unemployment-- heaven forbid the govmnt propose a win-win situation.

just waiting for the letter- or enote as the case may be.

SKIPPY
 
It's time to move on fellas. Was the timing of the age change really bad? Yes. Does it suck? Yes. Did it cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars? Yes. Is there anything we can do about it? No.
 
funny how quick the age 65 got thru so quick, but yet we still have to fly on the proven unsafe and antiquated FAA rest requirements---- if they dropped them to a max 12 hour duty day for a 2 man crew , it might at least save some possible furloughees and some who collect unemployment-- heaven forbid the govmnt propose a win-win situation.

just waiting for the letter- or enote as the case may be.

SKIPPY

Have no fear, ALPA is working hard on the fatigue issue. You will soon (next 10-20 years) see some results. Now that they have sold the entire industry up the river with the age 65 thing, they will have plenty of time to work on it and other important issues..like raising your dues while JP makes over 400K a year.

Or the airlines could take it upon themselves to implement their own policies to mitigate fatigue...oh wait, the airlines cannot find their asses with both hands. Disregard.

Am I bitter? Used to be...not anymore.....change of scenery took care of that.
 
funny how quick the age 65 got thru so quick, but yet we still have to fly on the proven unsafe and antiquated FAA rest requirements---- if they dropped them to a max 12 hour duty day for a 2 man crew , it might at least save some possible furloughees and some who collect unemployment-- heaven forbid the govmnt propose a win-win situation.

just waiting for the letter- or enote as the case may be.

SKIPPY


Simple solution. Vote Obama and it will ensure those over 60 guys will be paying a lot of taxes. I know quite a few FOs who just want to stick it to the lead age 65 guy over here and are voting Obama to see him whine about his millions being taxed.
 
ok
too soon for data- but it wasn't meant for flame.
how about us gen x and y's just get more involved and put our own stamp on the process instead of complaining about what "happened" to us.

But for info- Does anyone know any age 60+ guys have failed the medical?
 
ok
too soon for data- but it wasn't meant for flame.
how about us gen x and y's just get more involved and put our own stamp on the process instead of complaining about what "happened" to us.

But for info- Does anyone know any age 60+ guys have failed the medical?

No but I know a lot of 30 and 40 year olds that have. Genetics is like bad karma for some folks.
 
I don't know if failed medicals by over age 60 pilots will have any bearing or not when CAL's three on duty heart attacks in 2007 had zero influence.

BTW Spooky: The heart attack sufferers weren't in their 30s-and 40s. Interesting you show up to crow about unhealthy/unfortunate young pilots and impune their health/safety record, but you completely ignore actual heart attacks?!
 
I don't know if failed medicals by over age 60 pilots will have any bearing or not when CAL's three on duty heart attacks in 2007 had zero influence.

BTW Spooky: The heart attack sufferers weren't in their 30s-and 40s. Interesting you show up to crow about unhealthy/unfortunate young pilots and impune their health/safety record, but you completely ignore actual heart attacks?!

Not crowing about anything as serious as one's personal health, so if you took it as a hit, please forgive me. My point was that most of those that I have known with serious heart conditions were well below the age of 60. Don't know anything about the CAL issues? Also, don't have a dog in this fight so good night and I'll butt out now.
 
Spooky: Please do butt out. Sorry, but your input here is of no use on this issue.

Now, if there were a thread topic on what this gig was like when you started out (I'm guessing an unpressurized airplane with spark plugs) I'd be delighted to listen and you would have my full attention.
 
Well CAL was supposed to retire about 200 pilots in 2008. Instead, we are losing 150 pilots due to early retirement; 50 short of the amount we were supposed to retire if age 60 stayed. That is actually not too bad. However, in the next 4 years we may see little to no movement at all; unless a potential bankruptcy threatens the A-fund.
 
Spooky: Please do butt out. Sorry, but your input here is of no use on this issue.

Now, if there were a thread topic on what this gig was like when you started out (I'm guessing an unpressurized airplane with spark plugs) I'd be delighted to listen and you would have my full attention.


So sorry I guess I should not confuse you with the facts. Must be some older guy doing your "old" lady as you sure get upset over nothing.
 
I know quite a few FOs who just want to stick it to the lead age 65 guy over here and are voting Obama to see him whine about his millions being taxed.

Yeah, but he'll still have a job.

Are those same F/O's doing anything to make sure that their congressional representatives get to go home for good in November? More than just voting? Phone calls? Volunteering for the opponents campaign? Donating $$ to that camapign?

Remember every vote in the House was a "yes" vote...and 45 Representatives chose not to even vote at all.

And in the Senate...they voted "Unanimous Consent" for this to pass.
 
So sorry I guess I should not confuse you with the facts. Must be some older guy doing your "old" lady as you sure get upset over nothing.

Easy old timer. You wouldn't know a [current] fact from a hole in the ground.

Butt out. Like you said you would. We do not need you.

If you want to talk about old planes and better times? I'll listen. Otherwise? You're irrelevant.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom