Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sedona16 said:Give em hell boys! I am sick too death of watching United use and abuse it feeders. United's pilots and managers screw themselves over with poor decision making and then want to slash prices with what is already the most underpaid positions in the industry (the regionals)! I would love to see United get burned big time on all the routes ACA will fly! If only the other regionals had said enough is enough (like ACA) United would have had to honor their current contracts because replacing all regional flying would have been too much for Mesa to accomplish overnight.
If I read this correct, ACA pilots will now no longer be taking pay cuts either since the proposed cuts were based soley on a renewed contract with United. I would call this (directly or indirectly) a victory for Regionals and Pilots in general. Someone needed to take a stand. I hope it works out for ACA. Good luck to you all!
I.P. Freley said:Okay, thanks for your reply exphojump.
As for the ORD gate space, wasn't that part of the country AWAC's playground? I was under the impression that the Chicago hub was primarily "theirs" and the IAD hub was primarily "yours".
exphojump said:The Washington post article mentioned a cost of 14 CASM(which may be a high estimate). For 2002 we had an average CASM of 15.5 with aircraft utilization of 9 or so hours 30 turboprops and 33 FRJs. The reason our CASM is high is because of UAL. The have slowly strangled us with aircraft utilization so that we show a high CASM.
On our own we could reach a utilization of 11 to 12 hours a day for a CRJ, get rid of J41s, add CRJ900s, and add a aircraft capable of handling higher loads and coast to coast ops, all of which lower CASM.
The range of a 717 is less than a CRJ. The model would be something like Airtran/Southwest. The CRJ seat is not that comfortable, but neither is a LUV seat.
Stage lengths of up to 1000nm. This would reach MIA, DFW, MCI, and eastern Canada.
Lets assume an average trip length of 1000nm.
1000nm x 50 seats x 0.14 is $7000.00 per trip
$7000.00/$150.00 is 47 seats to break even at 14 cents CASM
I think the 14 cent CASM is high. With an all CRJ fleet I believe 12 cents is more accurate, assuming the FRJ Delta connection ops are self contained. With larger aircraft and CRJ 900s we could lower it in a few years to the 8 to 10 cent range.
Ask yourself, would you pay $300.00 roundtrip to go from Shreveport, LA to Portland, ME or Jacksonville, FL to Milwaukee, WI?
ACAI would offer Southwest service and prices to markets not traditionally served by LCCs. This market has not been exploited yet. JBLU is attempting to, but will not get the EMBs on property till the end of 2005.
acaTerry said:Released at 10:15am eastern time:
www.newsflashbs.com
Following an ACA announcement to start a low cost carrier out of IAD, the Mesa Air Group announced plans to compete with ACA.
"This is a terrific opportunity for Mesa" said Jerry Ornstien, CEO of Mesa. "As soon as ACA states their cost, we will be sure to undercut them with our flying, at the expense of our pilots"
ACA's Tom Moore replied "It does not matter. We will simply give our pilots another pay cut to meet the challenge". He was not available for further comment due to a house purchase he had to make.
Bain consulting recommended UAL purchase ACA and use the new operation to whipsaw mainline into further cuts.
KingAirer said:What does ACAs new airline have to offer that is not already there? There is going to be alot of competition. JetBlue already serves IAD, Airtran and Southwest have a good hold in BWI, and USAirways has a descent amount of service to all three DC airports. Not to mention that UAL is going to be replacing ACA on the routes they used to serve. Its going to be a tough road in my opinion, and i doubt they can profitbaly serve enough cities in the near future to use all of their current fleet.