Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ACA Contract Concessions

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I am also from the peanut gallery and CatYak is right on. I have never worked at a regional and realize I dont know jack BUT I do know that not get paid during 4 months of training at ACA is not what I wanted to do. I guess I didnt want to fly a jet bad enough. You guys are way UNDERPAID. I cant believe anybody from management could ask a regional pilot for pay concessions. I do wish you guys good luck.
 
CatYaaak said:
I'm just a member of the Peanut Gallery here, but THIS I find amusing! Are you implying that being a "big Italian" is supposed to somehow be intimidating?


Actually... no.... lol... but i do find it amusing you took that perception. I changed it just for you Cat so it remains clear it wasnt intended as intimidation. I also find it amusing you feel he needs to defend his home. Take note of the "We'll chat" statement.


Look guys, i just want to be able to fly an airplane and be able to make a decent living. My QOL is actually pretty good at ACA. I average 16 off per month and im able to grill a steak on the weekends while being able to afford a decent home on a regional pilot salary. When our management comes to us for concessions one week after Mesa ratifys their TA while quoting Mesa, you somehow dont want to go out and buy the Mesa guys a thank you card for raising the bar....
 
Last edited:
Beantown said:
when they only make 5-7% or so more.

Actually, there is a comparison chart on our ACO MEC site. Its 12% more till year 4 then 13% thereafter. That is only straight forward payrate comparison. It does not include bonuses, FULL cancellation pay, etc etc....
 
Beantown said:
You make fun of the Mesa pay but the fact is you (and your great contracts) only make a couple thousand more.


Let's compare "real world" compensation a bit.

I was hired at ACA in 3/00. I was a J41 (29 seat turboprop) CA from 01/02 - 10/02 and in training for 328Jet (32 seat jet) CA from 10/02 - 12/20/02. This means that for only 11 days in 2002 I was paid as a 328Jet CA. The rest of the year I was paid as a J41 CA (not to mention that Jan -June I was on reserve -- 11 days off minimum on reserve, BTW) and for basically the last 2 months of the year I received on ly the 75 hour monthly guarantee and no per diem. (I was based in IAD and that's where the 328Jet training takes place, hence no per diem) My gross pay for 2002 was $54,070.56. Based on what I flew last year, I will make around $60,000 in 2003 as a 328Jet CA lineholder for the entire year provided that the pay rates remain the same. (This does not include the May 9, 2003 contractual pay raise...which we probably aren't going to get I would guess) Keep in mind that this is flying a 32 passenger aircraft. The CRJ CA's with my seniority are making more $$. Also, I had 11 days off/month as a J41 CA and have had at least 12 days off/month as a 328Jet CA.

I'd like to find out from Mesa guys how this really compares to what you've made in 2002 and what you will make in 2003 with your new contract.
 
Last edited:
Concierj said:
Over 70% of pilots at ACA PFT'd .

You don't know what you are talking about. On the most recent seniority list I am #704 of 1674 with a date of hire of 3/13/00. If my math is correct, that puts me in about the top 42% of the pilot list and I know that I didn't PFT. So there goes your 70% number. Sorry. ACA quit PFT in...geez what was it ...1998 I think. That would put the number at less that 25% that PFT'd if you assume that all of the guys with DOH's before they quit PFT actually did PFT. The Air Wisky guys that were merged did not and they make up a good portion of the top of the list.
 
To my fellow ACA pilots (and to the rest as well):

1.) Getting into a ####ing contest with the fellow pilots is just beneath us at this time (divide and conquer).

2.) I have two Mesa buddies and both truthfully voted "no". They don't understand the "yes" votes either, but an awful lot of people took the bait and got scared.

3.) If a vote comes to ACA, I know I will vote NO concessions. I don't care - we are paid diddly squat to do our job. Our wages are within 10% of everybody else (yes we're 4% lower than CMR and ASA and we're 10-11% higher than Mesa and CHQ). 10% of nothing is nothing and 10% of almost nothing is still nothing.

4.) I don't know what your paycheck says, but last year I got paid $24.70/flt hr to fly right seat DO and $47.60 to fly left seat DO. My W-4 says $28K and some change in SALARY. Next year, converting to the CRJ, I will jump (potentially) to $58K as my highest possible earnings. So here I am a 3-year veteran of the airline with a 4-yr degree and 3,000 hrs of personally bought training to make the grade and I'm still averaging a salary roughly equivalent to an apprentice plumber or carpenter.

5.) Counting your per diem as salary is just sick. That is money you get to live on the road. If YOU think of it as salary, then the COMPANY will think of it as salary. It's not! It is a pitiful amount of money that does not adequately reimburse me for my travel expenses on the road. At the end of the year, I did not have my 28K salary and 5K of perdiem to spend. The 5K vanished on the road and Uncle Sam and the state of Maryland took 50% of the rest leaving me with $14,000 to pay all my bills at home.

5.) Even if I vote NO on concessions, I gather enough of you will vote YES to allow the thing to pass and I will have to eat my tongue and continue working or give up a very valuable seniority number.

6.) I will get poorer and the rich including Tom, Kerry and Jonathon will get richer. The industry will break our backs to provide $100 airfares to anywhere in the country while still making fat profits and boosting the stock price. This is capitalism.

7.) The only way #6 will not happen is if we:

a.) strike (or do something to slow the juggernaut)
b.) have a horrific week where undertrained, overworked and underpaid pilots have lots of accidents.
c.) re-regulate.

a.) requires a strong and united union and maybe even a national level demonstration of how bad the plight of a regional pilot is.
b.) is a nightmare in our minds, but a string of accidents (which I think is a possibility) from stressed and fatigued pilots would create a public outcry for change (regardless of cost - kind of like the current security spending).
c.) also unthinkable to a conservative capitalist like myself, but if the airline's management can't successfully run a business, then maybe we should have a regulated industry so people will understand that it costs $500 per ticket to take them coast-to-coast and $1000 to take them to Europe and there's no such thing as a "free ride".
 
Tarp,

Well said. It sounds like you have the best attitude of anyone around here. Also, I especially have to agree with you about counting per diem as part of earnings; it is ridiculous. It is absurd. Good luck,

pat
 
Tarp,
Just an observation: but I don't think the American public is going to believe, accept, or support anything that raises their airfares. The standard line is: if JetBlue, AirTran, and Southwest can do it, you (we) should be able as well, or the company deserves to go out of business - survival of the fittest.
 
Tarp's discusssion about wages (not sure why anyone calls it a "salary" since we're paid hourly...guess I shouldn't have minored in english) is right on. His/her accounting of annual income is much more in line with the rest of us. As for the per diem, sh*t I've spent a days' worth (or more) on one lousy meal when there was no where else to eat. It certainly isn't part of my annual income that I count on.


I too am constantly amazed that there isn't some horrific accident at the regional level. Having your duty day extended until 3 or 4 am and flying in crap wx doesn't result in the safest scenario as far as I'm concerned.

Let's just hope the major changes that need to occur in this industry happening fast.


(I know, I know. I'm hallucinating again! I shouldn't have stopped that glue sniffing thing! Sorry.)

Oh, it's too bad that a thread regarding concessions at ACA degraded into a "pi$$ing contest" between members. I am so glad that all my fellow pilots are professionals <-- damm tongue stuck in cheek again!
 
tarp said:

5.) Counting your per diem as salary is just sick. That is money you get to live on the road. If YOU think of it as salary, then the COMPANY will think of it as salary. It's not!

I guess this was directed in my general direction. I do not consider per diem as part of my salary but since per diem shows up in my paychecks, I included it in my previous post. I had $3661.20 in per diem last year (lots of reserve and training) so subtract that from the other number and that's how much I actually made. Well...before Uncle Sam got more than his fair share at least.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom