Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AA/US ISL question

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Sorry for the typo. Still think APA holds Usapa in a positive light after those recent court filings? Happy 420 days are here again...
 
Sorry for the typo. Still think APA holds Usapa in a positive light after those recent court filings? Happy 420 days are here again...


Never thought APA held any other pilot group in a positive light. I am OK that I will never be a reAAl pilot. We all have our own shortcomings and learn to live with it. :D
 
Never thought APA held any other pilot group in a positive light. I am OK that I will never be a reAAl pilot. We all have our own shortcomings and learn to live with it. :D

Don't feel too bad, the real "Hired not acquired" crowd don't like each other much either; Go figure.:nuts:
 
Things look rosey for Usapa after all those court Fillings this week?
Fillings is right. The BPR has got to be filling their britches about now.

My prediction is the the east BPR members find a way to go on LTD after APA takes over so that they never have to face the victims of their ill-conceived juggernaut and answer the question, "What about me? I sacrificed as much or more than the top 200 F/O's but I didn't get anything out of USAPA except an injunction and a weak, ineffective but obscenely expensive union."

Frankly, a few thousand hours of backpedaling for the next 15 years or so would be good for them.
 
You have a written receipt proving you paid $675 for a tie, and you get to wear it around your neck. But you have nothing in writing to prove your supposition about lost opportunity costs, other than a Leonidas publication sent to addresses that were stolen, causing the company to buy Lifelock for all.

Just admit it though, this isn't about ties or Lifelock, it's about upgrades and wide bodies, and that's why you guys have paid Marty millions trying to get them. :)


I heard that the lead attorney from the firm that AOL retained (Marty ) is not with the firm any more and is now representing AOL as an independent practitioner because AOL owes so much money to the firm?

Can anyone confirm or deny this rumor?
 
I'm not gonna jump on the little nimrod, it's all he's got. Your tie cost you $675, his lanyard cost him about $150K. Comparison over.

Incorrect assumption - if he has upgraded in the last 3 years or so - his little yellow lanyard has returned an investment of almost $80,000 thru the end of 2013. And your $675 tie has lost you thousands if according to your logic - if the TA was passed with the "Kirby" proposal and NIC implemented - you would have had upgraded / and or gotten a hourly pay increase.
 
Can anyone confirm or deny this rumor?

Thank you for your concern. Marty did leave the firm around fall of last year. No idea why but there's no change in our representation from him and Andy.

How long till the next "rumor" that AOL is broke surfaces?
 
Thank you for your concern. Marty did leave the firm around fall of last year. No idea why but there's no change in our representation from him and Andy.

How long till the next "rumor" that AOL is broke surfaces?

Thanks for confirming the rumor as true. No other rumors here.

Metrojet
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top