Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, I'll take a "guess"... 3 1/2 years worst case for a relatively small number of 91 DAL hires. You need to take another look at the arbitrated list. The top 2000, at least, of the NWA list lost approx. 3 years. As for your other points...sick leave? don't even go there dude....many NWA had 2000+ hrs accrued...and it went to 240 hours at DAL. Vacation? Yep...kept their longevity for that, but find themselves a lot more junior in category when vacation bidding comes around(see above). Non-rev travel based on DOH? Yeah...that makes up for everything.. in other words, they got DOH for everything.... except what matters..How did they lose 3 years? SERIOUSLY? Did they not carry over their longevity WRT sick, vacation, and their DOH for non rev travel? I'm tired of hearing how the NW guys lost out. Anyone wanna guess what a '91 hire PMDL lost?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
How did they lose 3 years? SERIOUSLY? Did they not carry over their longevity WRT sick, vacation, and their DOH for non rev travel? I'm tired of hearing how the NW guys lost out. Anyone wanna guess what a '91 hire PMDL lost?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I'm not going to hijack a thread on rehashed baloney! Let's just agree to disagree.Yeah, I'll take a "guess"... 3 1/2 years worst case for a relatively small number of 91 DAL hires. You need to take another look at the arbitrated list. The top 2000, at least, of the NWA list lost approx. 3 years. As for your other points...sick leave? don't even go there dude....many NWA had 2000+ hrs accrued...and it went to 240 hours at DAL. Vacation? Yep...kept their longevity for that, but find themselves a lot more junior in category when vacation bidding comes around(see above). Non-rev travel based on DOH? Yeah...that makes up for everything.. in other words, they got DOH for everything.... except what matters..
Don't get me wrong...lot's of good things for the nwa's in the merger, but until they can use their non-rev boarding priority when they bid for monthly schedules, positions on AE's, and vacations, I'll have to laugh when you ask "how did they lose 3 years" "SERIOUSLY?"
You have access to the same info I do. SERIOUSLY
Most of them lost about 2 years. There were some at the bottom that lost a few more than that because Delta hired 600 pilots in 2007/08 and NWA hired a lot less, and year 2000 hires were blended in with those 2007 hires (although the NWA pilots got credit for their longevity even while out on furlough, giving them 8th year pay instead of 3rd year pay after the merge, something NWA did not offer). There were some NWA guys (in the 1995 range) that actually did better than the DL guys in the same area. But overall, it was about 2 years difference, and 3 arbitrators decided that.
Bye Bye---General Lee
Yes, it was handled well. And exactly consistent with SWAs history
ALPA was playing games with SWA and YOU know that.
General,
Have you even looked at the seniority list or are you just making this up? For starters take a look at the top 4500 or so. The difference is consistently between 2 years 11 months and 3 years 4 months (with only a very few exceptions.) That range is more the norm throughout the list. Only a small number of NWA pilots hired between October 94 and June 95 ended up in the reverse situation. Me personally - 30 years this fall and sitting next to a pre-merger Delta pilot hired 3 years 8 months after me. You're right - the arbitrators decided it, and I accept that, but the OP was correct; it's consistently more like three years throughout the list.