airplane wizard
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2006
- Posts
- 792
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I know I shouldn't be the one to admit it, but yes that's the reason: Brakes. Given the high cost of brakes it a calculated risk worth taking. Sure we might lose a jet now and then, but maybe we won't. And if we don't shouldn' we maximize the return on our risk by saving those brakes. Plus we hit fewer bugs, necessitating less Windex.
We also takeoff slower thanks to Sully's experience in the Hudson. If we fly slow enough we can fly in formation with geese rather than through them!
BTW- What's a stick shaker on an Airbus?
If the airbus doesn't have a stick shaker, then how are the pilots warned of a stall?
I flew into Denver last week and it only showed 125mph on final approach on the direct tv gps map. Do they fly final at stick shaker to save $ on brakes?
If the airbus doesn't have a stick shaker, then how are the pilots warned of a stall?
I don't know... how are you warned of a stall on your copy of MS Flight Simulator?If the airbus doesn't have a stick shaker, then how are the pilots warned of a stall?
He is the airplane wizard after all, maybe he can figure it out.
Since most 320 family Airbus have stick shakers he is probably right...idiot.
I don't know... how are you warned of a stall on your copy of MS Flight Simulator?
It is imposable to stall a 320 family Airbus operating in NORMAL LAW.
The airbus can stall in normal law.
Have you ever flown at flaps full alpha max and then retracted the flaps? I wouldn't try because it only prevents the slats from retracting (alpha lock)
Also..full rudder in one direction followed by full rudder in the opposite direction is not approved and would cause a stall at low airspeeds.