Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

900's posing problems for Skywest?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

USCtrojan

KolobWestwind
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Posts
1,942
Take this with a grain of salt. Was just told Skywest could not certify the 900 for revenue service because the FAA has a minimum requirement to evacuate the aircraft. Skywest could not meet that minimum and subsequently the FAA is giving Skywest 6 months to achieve it. I've been told this by numerous people, however, have seen nothing in writing. Anyone?

Trojan
 
wait, airbus can evacuate an A380, but Sky West can't get it together to empty out a -900 with less seats than normal? gotta be a rumor
 
Already certified...nice try though...
 
USCtrojan said:
Take this with a grain of salt. Was just told Skywest could not certify the 900 for revenue service because the FAA has a minimum requirement to evacuate the aircraft. Skywest could not meet that minimum and subsequently the FAA is giving Skywest 6 months to achieve it. I've been told this by numerous people, however, have seen nothing in writing. Anyone?

Trojan
You really think SkyWest couldn't evac 70 people out of the -900 when they can get 70 out of the -700 and the -900 has 2 more exits? Nice try
 
viper548 said:
You really think SkyWest couldn't evac 70 people out of the -900 when they can get 70 out of the -700 and the -900 has 2 more exits? Nice try

LMAO, you guys kill me. I post something showing/telling you I have nothing in writing, just substantial rumor. I'm not trying to attack/spew/stir the pot. I threw it out there to see if anyone has anything in writing. If I hurt your feelings, then I am sorry.

Trojan
 
Skaff said:
How was that substantial. Who told you, that made it so substantial?

What's the definition of how in your substantial?

Trojan
 
Initially, they failed the test...then they went back and redid it. It's certified and ready to fly now. That could explain the rumor.
 
"SkyWest is pleased to announce that the FAA certification is complete"............"and the CRJ900 will play a significant role in our flying and future growth opportunities for SkyWest."
 
Last edited:
amcnd said:
"SkyWest is pleased to announce that the FAA certification is complete"............"and the CRJ900 will play a significant role in our flying and future growth opportunities for SkyWest."

And further bringing the regionals to a new low!! Coming soon, the CRJ-1000's to Skywest! Seats 150 pax, and will be flown at 50 seat rates!!!
 
Time to get out of the industry. This job has hit an all time low. Here we are trying to raise the bar, and SKWST hoes are on that thing like fried on rice.
 
amcnd said:
"SkyWest is pleased to announce that the FAA certification is complete"............"and the CRJ900 will play a significant role in our flying and future growth opportunities for SkyWest."

Thank You!! Appreciate it!

Trojan
 
ReportCanoa said:
Time to get out of the industry. This job has hit an all time low. Here we are trying to raise the bar, and SKWST hoes are on that thing like fried on rice.


There is the door...
 
The Drizzle said:
wait, airbus can evacuate an A380, but Sky West can't get it together to empty out a -900 with less seats than normal? gotta be a rumor

At 50 seat rates I'd be draggin' my feet too.

PS: Cute kid, YIKES!!!
 
Let me correct myself and end this rumor!! If you have ever been up to the factor to take delivery of a aircraft, you would know that the aircraft have Canadian tail number on them until your company has closed on the aircraft. And have received the "Fly Wire" from the FAA with your temp certificate.
Then they take the C-munber off and put the N-Number on.

So that being said there could not have been a EV tail number on any 900 in SLC.


And we didn't fail the test we chose to not go to a third try (and then fail) until we retained the FA'S on the proper Evac test....
 
amcnd said:
Let me correct myself and end this rumor!! If you have ever been up to the factor to take delivery of a aircraft, you would know that the aircraft have Canadian tail number on them until your company has closed on the aircraft. And have received the "Fly Wire" from the FAA with your temp certificate.
Then they take the C-munber off and put the N-Number on.

So that being said there could not have been a EV tail number on any 900 in SLC.


And we didn't fail the test we chose to not go to a third try (and then fail) until we retained the FA'S on the proper Evac test....

Dam, all that grief for nothing!! Thank you for the post, I was wondering where all the rumors were coming from!!

Trojan
 

Latest resources

Back
Top