Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

9/11 pilots for truth?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
..continued...
...Anomalies of the case in no particular order:
1. In December 2010, Chambers told the Detroit Free Press that the Government’s own explosives experts indicate that the bomb was impossibly defective. Only the US can make a defective bomb no one else has ever made one...ever.
2. The FBI has admitted to supplying the Portland Christmas Tree Bomber and the Wrigley Field Bomber with intentionally defective bombs shortly after the underwear bomber event. If someone gave me a "bomb" to bring on an airplane I would immediately call for law enforcement help...the FBI should do more of the fake bomb tactics to capture those peope.
3. Janet Napolitano’s comment that “the system worked” was a Freudian slip. The word "system" only means nefarious government lies and nothing else.
4. The plane taxied to the gate. The passengers were not allowed off of the plane for 20-30 minutes (Was the bomb still on the plane?). There was bomb material that was supposedly explosive all over the cabin of the plane. Nobody took any action to make sure the passengers were safe or that the “explosives” were of no danger to the passengers. This is evidence of foreknowledge that there was no danger to the passengers. Yes after a terrorist attack you pull into a gate and have everyone run off the plane and into the terminal...ya that's it.
5. TSA admitted knowledge of the threat while the flight was over Canada/Atlantic Ocean. No measures were taken to notify the pilot Da I think he already knew...da or to divert the flight for an emergency landing elsewhere.
6. My eyewitness account of the sharp dressed man and the related evidence as to this man. There is no other likely explanation for this man except for government involvement. The airport video has never been released and remains under protective order of the court.
7. The government’s continued release of Umar’s passport picture through the media. This was done for no other reason that to attempt to discredit me. Why such an effort to show a passport picture all over the media? The source of a picture of a murderer is always the first thing on my mind In no other case has a passport picture been shown in the media. A copy of the supposed “passport” of Umar, however, was not released to Chambers until June 2011. The release of the passport to standby defense counsel was delayed 19 months in order to limit the amount of time Chambers would need to have experts verify its authenticity.
8. The explanation for the cameraman is near unbelieveable. He started filming the sky I've never ever ever ever heard of a passenger videoing out the window of the plane...ever just before the attack started and then he turned to film the entire attack from beginning to end. We all thought we were going to die. The last thing on anyone’s mind at that time was to film something.
9. On 1-5-10 Breibart posted an article that indicated the Government had viewed over 200 hours of video from the airport and it showed no evidence of an accomplice. This article is contradicted by the 1-22-10 article of ABC News by Brian Ross that indicated that “The government is looking into the identity of a man that helped Umar at Schiphol.” The article fails to mention that this “sharp dressed man” escorted Umar through security without a passpot and instead tries to paint this man as Al Qaeda. The government is contradicting itself in both of these stories and is attemptin weak coverups in each story.
10. Umar is charged with conspiracy. The accomplices names or contributions are never mentioned. He did this all by himself with no help from anyone else at all so how can it be a conspiracy and if it was there is never a national security reason to not name others involved...ever They are not listed as wanted and they are never discussed. This is because they are U.S. Intelligence agents.
11. Customs spokeperson Ron Smith changed the official story about the 2nd man taken into custody in Detroit 5 times. Then he sent a half hearted apoogetic email to the media. My story as to this man has never changed. Ron Smith eventually gave up lying and quit talking about this man who was witnessed by nearly all of the passengers.
12. Why were pictures of Umar’s underwear constantly released to the media? These pictures show Umar’s underwear is largely intact. I have information from a credible source that due to this incident, Umar “Will never have any kids”. If I were there after the removal of underwear he would have been castrated...but I wasn't there...someone else must have done it. This fact is not in line with undamaged underwear. The continued release of the underwear was used as a propaganda piece to reinforce the deceit.
13. The prosecution has continued to block evidence from Umar’s standby attorney and in some cases, has provided it late. Why? Well this is the very first time a lawyer either defense or prosecuter did something like this...unbelievable!! If Umar was a terrorist nut, what is it that the government does not want the defense to see? It seems to me that if the official story is true, then this is an open and shut case. It appears that the government feels a need to insulate itself from civil cases filed by the passengers.
14. Why has Chambers repeatedly indicated that Umar has a very valid defense? Well...it might be his job...as a defense?? The answer is the entrapment defense. I give up...this is so stupid will some else please help me?
15. Portions of the Patriot Act were set to expire just before Christmas Day 2009. The Congressional vote to extend them was delayed until February. Body scanning machines were already built and sitting in warehouses. Michael Chertoff, the former head of the Department of Homeland Security has ties to the body scanning manufacturers. The U.S. had no terrorist attacks from 2001 until Christmas Day 2009. A new terrorist attack was needed to get the body scanning machines in the airports.
 
so who's to say this isn't just some guy looking for publicity? you never know people's motives.

Yeah, you're probably right. Just some dope lawyer who happened to be on that same flight and wants to come out looking like some conspiracy theorist so it will push his law practice to new heights of profitability.

Gov't involvement or not, we sure are lucky on the timing, because we'd be at so much more risk without those wonderful body scanners and "enhanced" pat downs. Now NFL fans are going to get enhanced pat downs before they get into the stadium. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...o-an-nfl-stadium-near-you-enhanced-pat-downs/
 
So, why can't the "truth" be what was reported to have happened? It appears to me that if you believe the reported 9/11 event, you have to keep looking for the "truth". Why is that?

What if one has thought for themselves and still comes to the same conclusion as what has been reported to have happened? Is this not possible?

Continuing to say, "think for yourself" sounds like your code for the Govt is hiding something.
 
So, why can't the "truth" be what was reported to have happened? It appears to me that if you believe the reported 9/11 event, you have to keep looking for the "truth". Why is that?

What if one has thought for themselves and still comes to the same conclusion as what has been reported to have happened? Is this not possible?

Continuing to say, "think for yourself" sounds like your code for the Govt is hiding something.

It may very well be and probably did go down as the .gov reported. The point of the "truthers" is to not accept any conclusions without full disclosure of all evidence. There is no reason to hide, destroy, or withhold evidence if there is nothing to hide.

I'm 99.9% certain that 9/11/01 went down as reported. But, I want FULL disclosure and transparency. Again, trust, but verify.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
 
Think for yourself.


It's not rocket science anymore. You're a couple clicks away from information that those in the information war would rather you just forget about.
The easy access to info however, also creates a perception problem, because of all the high schoolers with wild theories and youtube accounts.

"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act."
--- George Orwell


You must be one of the founders!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top