Yank McCobb
Song and Dance Man
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2005
- Posts
- 538
ironwedge said:Maybe not, but do you disagree with the logic?
I don't disagree that the hourly rate posted at Kitty Hawk is higher than anyone but SWA. However, I cannot agree to your "logic" because there is none. Pay is pay. And to me, pay = money that can be used for expenses or saved for the future. I cannot "spend" nor "save" an hourly rate. I CAN spend or save what that hourly rates translates into as far as actual dollars earned. THAT is the only thing you can use to compare one company's pay to another's.