JungleJett
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2004
- Posts
- 1,111
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FAA releases radar video of F-16's close call with GA aircraft
By AOPA ePublishing staff
AOPA has obtained a video of the radar return and radio calls for the March 21 incident in which an F-16 pilot flew in close formation with the unsuspecting pilots of a Pilatus PC-12 and a Beechcraft Premier jet flying through an active military operations area. The pilots took aggressive maneuvers to try to prevent a midair.
The F-16 pilot, based out of Luke Air Force Base, was reprimanded. Luke officials have told AOPA that they will alter their local training program to avoid this type of encounter in the future.
AOPA has recommended that the Air Force and the FAA develop a way for center controllers to communicate with military controllers in real time. The two were not communicating at the time of the March incident.
AOPA reports the F-16 pilot was reprimanded....
Hey, how about this...don't fly through a friggin active MOA like an idiot when fighters are manuevering at high speed. What a concept. Then you won't get your ridiculous RA and sound like a clown on the radio...
How about this...Lt Viper Driver show some discipline while playing war games and not execute a 180 to intercept an non participating aircraft? What a concept! I guess they don't teach that in ROTC?
And by definition, a MOA is not closed airspace. There was nothing illegal about the two aircraft transiting the airspace.
How about this...Lt Viper Driver show some discipline while playing war games and not execute a 180 to intercept an non participating aircraft? What a concept! I guess they don't teach that in ROTC?
And by definition, a MOA is not closed airspace. There was nothing illegal about the two aircraft transiting the airspace.
For some of us in certain fields like aerial firefighting, and for those in EMS flying, we do not really have the luxury of steering around MOAs.
Most likely Capt or Maj Viper Driver! I sounds like he had some good discipline, he called a KIO and stopped the engagement to wait on a VFR aircraft to transition. It looks as if he stayed "well clear" of the civilian aircraft.How about this...Lt Viper Driver show some discipline while playing war games and not execute a 180 to intercept an non participating aircraft? What a concept! I guess they don't teach that in ROTC?
Not illegal at all, just not that smart when it is active. As I have said before if you trade paint with me in a MOA, I have a better chance of making it out alive than you. So your family gets the bad news and I go home that night all because "you had the right to be there."And by definition, a MOA is not closed airspace. There was nothing illegal about the two aircraft transiting the airspace.
For some of us in certain fields like aerial firefighting, and for those in EMS flying, we do not really have the luxury of steering around MOAs.
Most likely Capt or Maj Viper Driver! I sounds like he had some good discipline, he called a KIO and stopped the engagement to wait on a VFR aircraft to transition. It looks as if he stayed "well clear" of the civilian aircraft.
Well, Lt Viper Driver was the only thing that caused the situation in the MOA, he executed a 180 to intercept the civillian, flew his wing for a while, and then executed another 180 to continue his original course. There was no conflict until he created one. He was reprimanded, the USAF is changing its policy on flights in MOA's, and the civillian didn't even get the transmission to call the controlling agency. It already looks like the USAF has admitted errors in operations, and is changing those operations. The military does not own the MOA's, they are joint use.