Knob
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2004
- Posts
- 217
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/30825489/detail.html
Great job to the crew!!
Great job to the crew!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the two stories kind of conflict. Was the smoke in the cockpit in-flight or did smoke in the cabin occur due to the hard landing, hitting lights etc?
The smoke occurred on final. Cockpit quickly filled with smoke and crew couldnt see, hence the bad landing.
I'm sure you're right. I can see how "5912" could be heard as "United 12.I think the pilot f-ed it up by not using his complete call sign. Using a partial call sign on a routine basis is a bad habit because in situations like this, saying jetlink or acey prior to the flight number will not come naturally. I hear it all the time even when two different airlines are on the same frequencies with similar call signs during read-backs.
With the background noise in the tower cab and old equipment it is very possible that the tape caught the 59 in 5912 but only the 12 was heard by the controller. Using the proper callsign of Jetlink or Acey 5912, would probably have solved the issue and quelled the controllers suspicions that it was a "prank" call.
Really? Please...
This crew did a fantastic job. I think until you are in a cockpit unable to see the instruments or the hand in front of your face, it's hard to say how you would react. I don't know if I would say the call sign if I was that amped up.
Don't be so dramatic....
Don't be so dramatic....
So you know about the situation, and whether they could see or not? This was not your average "hey is that smoke" event.
We all know they don't like the Acey call sign, but it should come naturally. But what do I know. The BA038 777 captain did something similar-- used a call sign for his next flight. The controller in that case, saw what was happening and reacted well.
Agree. The controller was sharp in the BA situation. However, the Capt of BA38, when he made the call, stated "speedbird xxx" which immediately clued the controller in that there was an issue. The controller knew he had a BA on short final and could correlate that that was the emergency aircraft. Why do guys in the US not use the full call sign? Do guys think that it sounds cool to just say the numbers or is it just pure laziness?
In this situation, the FO blirts out 5912 which sounded like United 12. Had he said ACEY 5912, I think the outcome with the response to the incident would have been much better.
I am glad everyone got out of this safely and it sounds like the crew did a great job.....I just don't think that the controller should be raked over the coals because of someone's slack radio technique.