Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

pilot sentenced for being drunk

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

paddlehigh

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Posts
152
DENVER - Aaron Jason Cope, age 33, of Norfolk, Virginia, was sentenced this morning by visiting U.S. District Court Judge John R. Tunheim to serve 6 months in federal prison followed by six months of home detention for operating a common carrier under the influence of alcohol. The judge ordered Cope to spend the first three months of home detention under electronic monitoring.
Cope was also sentenced to serve two years on supervised release. U.S. District Court Judge John R. Tunheim is visiting from the District of Minnesota. Cope was ordered to report to a facility designated by the U.S. Bureau of Prisons by Jan. 3, 2012.
Aaron Jason Cope was indicted by a federal grand jury in Denver on March 16, 2011. He was convicted of the charge alleged in the indictment, namely the operation of an aircraft under the influence of alcohol following a two-day bench trial which started on June 6, 2011 and concluded on June 7, 2011.
Judge Tunheim's written opinion finding the defendant guilty was issued on June 17, 2011. Cope was sentenced on Friday.
According to the indictment, facts presented during the trial, and the written opinion of Judge Tunheim, on Dec. 8, 2009, Cope was the co-pilot and first officer on United Express Flight 7687, a commercial flight operated by Shuttle America, Inc., from Austin, Texas to Denver, Colorado.
As co-pilot and first officer, Cope was in a "safety sensitive" position.
The captain of Flight 7687, Robert Obodzinski, sat in close proximity to Cope in the cockpit. Obodzinski testified that although Cope appeared to be thinking and speaking clearly, periodically during the flight he detected an unusual odor, which he eventually concluded was the smell of an alcoholic beverage.
Upon arriving at the gate at DIA, Obodzinski leaned over and "took a big wiff." Obodzinski testified that he concluded that the smell of an alcoholic beverage was emanating from Cope.
According to the facts presented during the trial, Obodzinski contacted dispatch to delay the next scheduled leg of the flight until the issue was resolved. While Cope went outside to conduct a post-flight inspection, Obodzinski spoke by phone with the acting chief pilot of the airline, his union representative and a Human Resources Manager for Republic Airways, the parent company of Shuttle America.
Once Cope returned to the cockpit, Obodzinski reportedly told him, "if you have any problem taking a breathalyzer, call off sick and get out of here," to which Cope replied, "Well, I guess I better call off sick then." Obodzinski was directed by his company to escort Cope to an alcohol testing facility in DIA's main terminal.
At the testing facility, according to testimony, Cope stated that he had gone to a bar with a friend and also purchased beer from a gas station near the hotel. On Dec. 8, 2009, at 10:33 a.m. Cope was administered a breathalyzer test, which reflected his alcohol content was .094.
At 10:54 a.m. a second "confirmation" test was administered, which reflected a .084 percent alcohol content. According to Judge Tunheim's opinion, Republic Airways, the parent company of Shuttle America, has a "zero tolerance" policy regarding alcohol consumption in safety-sensitive positions, and considers a blood alcohol content of .02 percent grounds for termination. The FAA prohibits an individual from acting as a crew member of a civil aircraft while impaired by alcohol, with a blood alcohol content of .04 percent, or within eight hours after the consumption of any alcohol beverage.
"The public rightly expects that airline pilots will not drink and fly," said U.S. Attorney John Walsh. "Because flying while intoxicated is a serious crime and puts the lives of passengers and people on the ground in danger, we will prosecute it swiftly and effectively - every time."
"Today's sentencing is a clear signal that severe penalties are in store for those pilots who act in a criminally irresponsible manner and fail in their core duty to protect the passengers that are in their care," said Max Smith, Department of Transportation (DOT) Office of Inspector General (OIG) Special Agent in Charge of the Fort Worth Regional Office. "Both DOT and the OIG are committed to ensuring the safety of the Nation's aviation system. We will continue to vigorously investigate and work with our prosecutorial colleagues to see that those who violate criminal laws and endanger the traveling public are punished to the fullest extent of the law."
This case was investigated by the Department of Transportation Office of the Inspector General, and the FAA, with full cooperation by Shuttle America.
 
Man, I bet that FO has the Capt's picture on the wall of the prison cell for the next 6 months as his cellmate is braiding his hair and calling him 'honeybunny'.

People, if you think you're still drunk or may still be under the influence, DON'T GO TO THE AIRPORT!!!!! Jeez, it's not hard!! If you call out sick, so what!!!! Man, prision time, loss of your job, and shame of putting your family through that...worth it?
 
Man, I bet that FO has the Capt's picture on the wall of the prison cell for the next 6 months as his cellmate is braiding his hair and calling him 'honeybunny'.

People, if you think you're still drunk or may still be under the influence, DON'T GO TO THE AIRPORT!!!!! Jeez, it's not hard!! If you call out sick, so what!!!! Man, prision time, loss of your job, and shame of putting your family through that...worth it?

Alcohol is not worth it.
 
It's like people that steal 2 dollar mini's of whiskey. WTF are you thinking? You're gonna throw away a career over 2 bucks?
 
On a completely unrelated note, I used to deliver packages to Judge Tunheim when I was a FedEx courier in Minneapolis.
 
Nice Captain, why didn't he just tell him to call in sick before calling anyone.

Because he's an obvious DB. Call the guy out if he won't do it for himself....
 
Because he's an obvious DB. Call the guy out if he won't do it for himself....

I wouldn't call the Capt a DB for this. It's not like he call the CP before the flight has even operated. If I read this correctly. The FO has operated the flight. It's a shame that the FO choose to operated the flight anyways. The Capt probably didn't catch it unitl it was too late.
 
Nice, the FO shows up plastered and everyone is blasting the captain. It is one thing to show up a little under 8 hours from being in the bar after a few drinks and still having a little left in your system. But this guy was blowing a 0.94 AFTER flying a leg, which means he showed up for duty pretty well hammered. The only "obvious DB" in this case is the FO. The captain may have been able to try and protect the FO a little better, but he was under no obligation to. I think it is unreasonable to expect a captain to stick his neck out for someone that far out of line.
 
Nice, the FO shows up plastered and everyone is blasting the captain. It is one thing to show up a little under 8 hours from being in the bar after a few drinks and still having a little left in your system. But this guy was blowing a 0.94 AFTER flying a leg...

Exactly. Figure he showed up on the curb maybe 45 minutes before the flight, plus a 2-hour flight AUS-DEN, plus another 15 minutes to the testing office. 0.94 three hours after showing up at work? The captain isn't the DB here...
 
No blame on the captain. The FO needs help.

When your processing alcohol you can justify just about anything, including showing up for work.

What a shame to see someone that has obviously invested many a night and day only to be taken out by one foolish drunkon. If you know someone who is using get them help. Its just not worth it.

http://himsprogram.com/
 
If you show up for work drunk, you are irresponsible, and deserve what you get. It's not on the Captain.
 
According to the indictment, facts presented during the trial, and the written opinion of Judge Tunheim, on Dec. 8, 2009, Cope was the co-pilot and first officer on United Express Flight 7687, a commercial flight operated by Shuttle America, Inc., from Austin, Texas to Denver, Colorado.

Co-pilot AND First Officer...this guy was good.
 
Nice, the FO shows up plastered and everyone is blasting the captain. It is one thing to show up a little under 8 hours from being in the bar after a few drinks and still having a little left in your system. But this guy was blowing a 0.94 AFTER flying a leg, which means he showed up for duty pretty well hammered. The only "obvious DB" in this case is the FO. The captain may have been able to try and protect the FO a little better, but he was under no obligation to. I think it is unreasonable to expect a captain to stick his neck out for someone that far out of line.

WELL PUT! Except for one glaring issue.

The dude flew. He's clearly beyond a talking-to at this point, since he's entered the system as a criminal. If he starts looking for a blame game play, he has a perfect one.

Why didn't my captain ensure the safety of the flight I was operating drunk?

Insert deposition here, add a silly CX here, and BAM.

Certainly the worst case scenario, but then again- how many times can you cite "pilot error" as the found cause when it really honestly wasn't? I realize I'm being cynical, but this could be YOU one of these days staring down such a ridiculous barrel.

The ATA collaborate on all sorts of things, from labor tactics to the MEL (haha). Check your FOM (or whatever you call it) for PIC Authority and Responsibility. My wholly owned realigned that at the exact same time as our mainline, and that doesn't happen without management collaboration.

It's a real eye-opener when you see the implications.
 
Last edited:
WELL PUT! Except for one glaring issue.

The dude flew. He's clearly beyond a talking-to at this point, since he's entered the system as a criminal. If he starts looking for a blame game play, he has a perfect one.

Why didn't my captain ensure the safety of the flight I was operating drunk?

Insert deposition here, add a silly CX here, and BAM.

Certainly the worst case scenario, but then again- how many times can you cite "pilot error" as the found cause when it really honestly wasn't? I realize I'm being cynical, but this could be YOU one of these days staring down such a ridiculous barrel.

The ATA collaborate on all sorts of things, from labor tactics to the MEL (haha). Check your FOM (or whatever you call it) for PIC Authority and Responsibility. My wholly owned realigned that at the exact same time as our mainline, and that doesn't happen without management collaboration.

It's a real eye-opener when you see the implications.

The CA reported it as soon as he was aware. Do you think he CA is responsible to report things he is unaware of? Omniscient captains, the newest trend in aviation!
 
The CA reported it as soon as he was aware. Do you think he CA is responsible to report things he is unaware of? Omniscient captains, the newest trend in aviation!

STOP! STOP NOW!

You are making sense. Report immediately to the company shrink for an eval.


In reality, you're right. In this case, it took HOW long to "smell" the issue? Seriously, we are being given more and more responsibility and liability, and less and less power.

Such a gimped up game.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top