Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

pilot sentenced for being drunk

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
FO definitely is to blame. If you're the cap'n and find a drunk FO before the flight, what do you do? If you find out during / after what do you do? That''s all I'm sayin'. Not defending the FO for showing up drunk.

You see the issue.

It's almost impossible. If I was the CA on this flight, and 15 minutes after wheels up I smelled trouble... Wow.

The greasy company lawyers and the snake oiled defense lawyers can find a way to hang a totally innocent captain. That's my point.
 
Nice Captain, why didn't he just tell him to call in sick before calling anyone.

Because the Captain was being a professional. I could understand if the FO got into the hotel van and the Captain smelled alcohol. Only then should he have encouraged the FO to call in sick. Once in the airplane (and operating a leg no less), different story.

This lush of an FO put the Captain in a bad position.
 
Over 8k hours, mostly PIC jet, airlines, etc, would NEVER throw a guy under the bus like that!

So what? I have almost 3 times your experience. What does your resume have to do with it? Make no mistake here. The FO threw himself under the bus.

Yes, the FO was intoxicated, but, give him a chance to bow out before you destroy his life. Now, if you give him a chance and he still acts stupid, that's another story. People do stupid things and much worse things in life with much lesser consequences, so while he was definitely wrong, you don't destroy someone's life like that. Compasion is something missing in today's world.

Nobody "destroyed his life":rolleyes: but himself. This FO made a conscious choice and choices have consequences.

As for a destroyed lives, do you remember the NWA pilots that were jailed for flying drunk? Didn't one of them serve his time in jail, went through a program and flew again for Northwest?
 
Last edited:
Because the Captain was being a professional. I could understand if the FO got into the hotel van and the Captain smelled alcohol. Only then should he have encouraged the FO to call in sick. Once in the airplane (and operating a leg no less), different story.

This lush of an FO put the Captain in a bad position.

Exactly. The time for calling in sick ended when he operated that flight. I would not risk my own career to protect someone who couldn't stay away from alcohol.
 
One has to wonder if this was the first time he operated a flight under the influence. I wouldn't be surprised if he did it before and either wasn't caught or had a CA who either didn't notice or didn't want to report it.
 
I agree that the FO bears the full blame for this. The captain spoke up as soon as he could.

My problem with this is the sentence. 6 months prison time? I can understand losing your job and your license, but not 6 months. You see in the news several times a year people who get caught drinking and driving for the 5th or 6th time. What do they get? Nothing other than a fine. I haven't seen one with jail time other than a few weeks of time served. This sentence is totally out of line in my opinion. Fire him and suspend his license. That should have been it.

You're KIDDING right?

I totally agree with you, 6 months is ridiculous. HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN 5+ YEARS!

How on earth can you compare someone who's been caught driving home from the bar at 2am over the limit to a guy who's operated a flight with 76 trusting passengers completely and utterly wasted?

Two crew members are required for operating a passenger airliner. The FO isn't there for decoration. Suppose something happened to the Captain while enroute that caused him to pass out. Now those folks have a guy at the helm who is probably over .1 BAC. He'd have a hard time even staying upright in his chair let alone making command decisions and using sound judgement.

They should have thrown away the G D key. 6 months? Pathetic.
 
Over 8k hours, mostly PIC jet, airlines, etc, would NEVER throw a guy under the bus like that! Yes, the FO was intoxicated, but, give him a chance to bow out before you destroy his life. Now, if you give him a chance and he still acts stupid, that's another story. People do stupid things and much worse things in life with much lesser consequences, so while he was definitely wrong, you don't destroy someone's life like that. Compasion is something missing in today's world.

Who cares how much time you have. Your experience has no bearing on deciding what to do in this case.

The only person who threw the FO under the bus was the FO. The FO risked throwing the captain and a plane full of passengers under the bus because of his actions. The FO destroyed his own life and risked destroying the lives of everyone else on that plane and their families as well.

If the guy had such a serious problem that he could not recognize that it was wrong to fly a plane full passengers while hammered, he has no business EVER going near an airplane. The more I think about this the less I have sympathy for him and more I support the captain.

Let's just say the captain, before notifying anyone else, did tell the FO to call out sick after he had flown an airplane while drunk. Now the FO gets off with just a sick call. Do you think a guy with that big a problem will all of a sudden get help because the captain told him to call out sick? Perhaps, but I'd bet against it. By telling the guy to call out, and letting him live to fly drunk another day, you have just played Russian Roulette with more people lives. That does not seem like great judgement to me.

Compassion is one thing, and yes we need more of it. But in this case I think turning in the FO after being so careless and reckless really was more compassionate than giving him the opportunity to do it again. I am sure his potential future passengers and their families would agree with me.
 
I gotta agree with you Dude. Additionally, if the CA doesn't turn him in after discovering he was drunk, the CA becomes an accomplice to the "crime." That could cost the CA HIS license.

Nope, if this had happened on my flight deck, I'd have done EXACTLY the same thing.
 
NEDude and Fubi on the same page?! Run for your lives, boys and girls, the apocalypse is indeed upon us!
 
You all are skipping the most important thing! Can the FO LOG IT?
 
Multiple failures here....

In a cloud of "poor judgment" the FO shouldn't have shown up for the flight. He probably did the best he could to conceal his breath and judging from his abilities to properly complete his tasks he most likely made this error before. Everybody makes poor decisions from time to time and sometimes it takes rock bottom before the trend is detected.
The captain should have made is concerns know to the FO and they would have come up with an exit strategy that didn't involve (media, tax money, courts, prison and negative perception of pilots). His inability to enquire from the FO about his competence when doubt is present only speaks his ability to "command" the aircraft. The captains' character is made known when he calls to enquire about what to do next (save his own @ss). His lack of command, character, and compassion doesn't rest solely on his shoulders, we as a society have a duty to teach our young these qualities so when they are tested, they can proceed with honor.

I don't know any of the facts of the story besides what I read in the article but in my humble opinion the FO hit rock bottom (luckily no one was hurt) and the captain has to live with how he handled the situation. Unfortunately, our legal system finds that 6 months in federal prison will "help" his problem.
 
So...I'm assuming ALPA will get his job back after the 1 year off. We've all seen them get people back online that have done worse.
 
So...I'm assuming ALPA will get his job back after the 1 year off. We've all seen them get people back online that have done worse.

Nope. He's now a felon. Can't fly OR vote.
 
Nope. He's now a felon. Can't fly OR vote.

Not exactly true. Some of our best felons run for office and fly....

The FO will lose all his pilot certificates and will have to take his private to Commercial all over again. His flight time will count but it will take around a year to get back to paid flying status (after he gets out of "the big house") and because he is a convicted felon - no ATP. But he can run for congress and have friends who congrssmen owe.....
 
Who says he's a felon? If memory serves, only specific crimes and those with sentences of more than 1 year in prison are felonies under U.S. federal law. With a sentence of 6 months, this should be a Class B misdemeanor.

Not sure if this particular crime is a felony by definition, though.
 
Last edited:
Multiple failures here....

In a cloud of "poor judgment" the FO shouldn't have shown up for the flight. He probably did the best he could to conceal his breath and judging from his abilities to properly complete his tasks he most likely made this error before. Everybody makes poor decisions from time to time and sometimes it takes rock bottom before the trend is detected.
The captain should have made is concerns know to the FO and they would have come up with an exit strategy that didn't involve (media, tax money, courts, prison and negative perception of pilots). His inability to enquire from the FO about his competence when doubt is present only speaks his ability to "command" the aircraft. The captains' character is made known when he calls to enquire about what to do next (save his own @ss). His lack of command, character, and compassion doesn't rest solely on his shoulders, we as a society have a duty to teach our young these qualities so when they are tested, they can proceed with honor.

I don't know any of the facts of the story besides what I read in the article but in my humble opinion the FO hit rock bottom (luckily no one was hurt) and the captain has to live with how he handled the situation. Unfortunately, our legal system finds that 6 months in federal prison will "help" his problem.

I agree with this poster. I feel bad for this guy maybe because I am a drunk but as a captain I would never throw a guy under the bus like that. Come to jesus talk, call in sick in isnt that hard to defuse this situation. CA sounds like a giant ******************************bag to me.
I hope the fo can get rehabed because that's what the prison system is supposed to do, rehabilitate people. Yeah right, after his stint he can climb right back into the cockpit because he has gone through the system. The reality is he will be lucky to ever hold a minimum wage job again. And like some earlier said he is a felon cant even vote. All rights are pretty much gone and all the ca had to do was tell him to call in sick.
 
All rights are pretty much gone and all the ca had to do was tell him to call in sick.
And it would have been another CAs problem, maybe it wouldn't have worked out so well. many here want to find an excuse to justify behavior on both sides. An alcoholic does not respond to "come to jesus talks" or many other inputs. For many alcoholics jail or some intervention from the judicial system is required, and even there are some who collect DUIs like baseball cards. Sorry being an airline pilot isn't some god given right, ya gotta earn it and maintain it by not screwing the pooch. He got off lucky and deserves prison, and the MickyDs grill master position waiting for him after he gets out.
No pity whats so ever.
 
So...I'm assuming ALPA will get his job back after the 1 year off. We've all seen them get people back online that have done worse.

Except for the fact that RAH brand is Teamsters...he's not getting his job back, and neither ALPA nor Teamsters can fix that.
 
Both pilots on the NWA flight from Fargo to MSP that started all of this both got back to flying. Captain with NWA and FO with American, so don't say it CAN'T happen.
 
Nice Captain, why didn't he just tell him to call in sick before calling anyone.

true, but the much bigger dueche move was showing up to fly a plane with what was probably a .10 BAC.
 
Over 8k hours, mostly PIC jet, airlines, etc, would NEVER throw a guy under the bus like that! Yes, the FO was intoxicated, but, give him a chance to bow out before you destroy his life. Now, if you give him a chance and he still acts stupid, that's another story. People do stupid things and much worse things in life with much lesser consequences, so while he was definitely wrong, you don't destroy someone's life like that. Compasion is something missing in today's world.

I have flown with Rob (the captain) several times. He is an absolute stand up guy. There is much more to this story, accusations where made to the company from 3rd parties well before he became involved. If he had the ability to handle this as a crew I'm sure he would have but the situation was out of his hands before they landed in DEN. I don't know the FO but I imagine he was a high functioning alcoholic to show up to work in this condition.
 
I agree with this poster. I feel bad for this guy maybe because I am a drunk but as a captain I would never throw a guy under the bus like that. Come to jesus talk, call in sick in isnt that hard to defuse this situation. CA sounds like a giant ******************************bag to me.
I hope the fo can get rehabed because that's what the prison system is supposed to do, rehabilitate people. Yeah right, after his stint he can climb right back into the cockpit because he has gone through the system. The reality is he will be lucky to ever hold a minimum wage job again. And like some earlier said he is a felon cant even vote. All rights are pretty much gone and all the ca had to do was tell him to call in sick.

Yes the captain could have diffused the situation...for that one day. What about the next time the guy shows up drunk? What happens if the guy showed up drunk on the next trip and crashed and killed people? Can you imagine the fallout? Not just for the crew and passengers involved, but for the company and the rest of the industry? How would you like FAA mandated drug and alcohol screening prior to the start of every work day?

The simple fact is the FO has a serious problem, AND committed crime that endangered people, AND violated FARs, AND violated company policy.

It is one thing to advise a guy to call in sick at report time if you think he stayed at the bar too long. It is another to try and protect a guy who just flew while hammered.

Perhaps I am harsh, but I have lost family to a drunk driver. By most accounts the drunk driver was a nice guy who just made one bad choice. But that one bad choice meant two of my cousins grew up orphans. I find it hard to have much sympathy for someone who so carelessly endangers the lives of many people.

Bravo on the captain. To those who think the captain should have tried to protect the FO, I think you need to seriously examine your priorities.
 
This is an interesting thread. Some folks say 'help the FO, and give him break". Others say, "the Captain fulfilled his professional obligations to the passengers, the company, and even himself". Hypothetically speaking, if the offending crewmember is a personal friend, then the actions of other crewmembers may be more accommodating. It seems that many pilots believe that merely being a pilot entitles them to amnesty from other pilots holding them accountable. Pilots who subscribe to this brotherhood mindset are often the first to fall, because at some point they encounter an individual who doesn't share the same "clan mentality". Some guys and gals have very high standards of behavior and personal integrity that do not permit looking the other way when someone crosses the line. An employee who shows up to work intoxicated at a factory job should expect to be fired. A pilot who shows up to work intoxicated should expect to be fired and also expect to go to prison. If by the grace of God or the friendship of other crewmembers the offending pilot escapes an unpleasant outcome for his actions, then he his very fortunate. If however, the offending pilot is discovered and held fully accountable for his actions, he has only one person to blame. Himself
 
Multiple failures here....

In a cloud of "poor judgment" the FO shouldn't have shown up for the flight. He probably did the best he could to conceal his breath and judging from his abilities to properly complete his tasks he most likely made this error before. Everybody makes poor decisions from time to time and sometimes it takes rock bottom before the trend is detected.
The captain should have made is concerns know to the FO and they would have come up with an exit strategy that didn't involve (media, tax money, courts, prison and negative perception of pilots). His inability to enquire from the FO about his competence when doubt is present only speaks his ability to "command" the aircraft. The captains' character is made known when he calls to enquire about what to do next (save his own @ss). His lack of command, character, and compassion doesn't rest solely on his shoulders, we as a society have a duty to teach our young these qualities so when they are tested, they can proceed with honor.

I don't know any of the facts of the story besides what I read in the article but in my humble opinion the FO hit rock bottom (luckily no one was hurt) and the captain has to live with how he handled the situation. Unfortunately, our legal system finds that 6 months in federal prison will "help" his problem.

You say you don't know the facts, yet you question the Captain's character, ability to command and compassion? Really?? It's easy to be the Monday morning quarterback isn't it?

I agree with other posters that had the FO's intoxication became known in the hotel van or at least prior to flight, then yes, perhaps insistence to call in sick and a peer flogging would have been prudent. However, the FO operated an airplane while unquestionably intoxicated. With a BAC level of .094 after the 1.5ish hour flight, the FO's BAC was undoubtedly much higher at the beginning of the flight.

IMHO, the Captain should have no problem living with how he handled the situation.
 
Last edited:
Sooooo this is why you get asked this related question during the interview process because it's preparing you for the real world... Got it!!!! Great industry!!!! What about professional standards? Could they have played an effective roll in this situation?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom