Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA is in position to dominate ATL

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You honestly think that the busiest airport in the world will cater to dedicating 10/28 to SWA, thus disrupting the flow of traffic? Seriously, you honestly think a MDW flight is going to be given 28 on a routine basis?

Good luck with that dream, but it ain't happening.

Then why did they clear the land over there? Apparently Airtran considered it at some point. And in case you haven't flown to a lot of SWA cities like we do on the 88, ATC generally lets SWA do whatever they want. Watch them get assigned the 10/28 transition even from up north. What you don't understand about ATC is that if they're using a "trip" configuration, ATC doesn't really care who gets assigned what, they just randomly assign SOMEBODY the transition. If SWA requests that most of those transitions go to them, they'll probably get it, because ATC DOESN'T CARE WHO DOES IT AS LONG AS SOMEONE DOES IT. Get it?

She doesn't? She told me she was a Delta pilot? Oh, right, that wasn't the truth.

Bye Bye--General Lee

Keep living the dream, General. I think they're missing you over on the regional forum... you might need to go slumming again and "impress" them with your amazing wit and sense of humor. :rolleyes:
 
ATC really knows that SW is mission oriented, get the job done. Most legacies are interested in slowing it down and padding the paycheck. Two completely different ways of operating.. and they understand that.

I rode on DL not too long ago and there was a slight delay at the gate for a mechanical. 15-20 minutes. No big deal right? Once taxing out, the CA was moving at 1mph for 25+ minutes to get to the runway....AFTER the delay at the gate. (and no, there was no traffic or flow time) His goal was to maximize his paycheck and could careless about the people behind him. Just one example of the stuff that happens everday.
 
ATC really knows that SW is mission oriented, get the job done. Most legacies are interested in slowing it down and padding the paycheck. Two completely different ways of operating.. and they understand that.

I rode on DL not too long ago and there was a slight delay at the gate for a mechanical. 15-20 minutes. No big deal right? Once taxing out, the CA was moving at 1mph for 25+ minutes to get to the runway....AFTER the delay at the gate. (and no, there was no traffic or flow time) His goal was to maximize his paycheck and could careless about the people behind him. Just one example of the stuff that happens everday.


C'mon Red...he was just trying to safely taxi the aircraft. Everyone knows you can't taxi faster than 1 mph and still be safe. It's impossible. Safety is paramount to Delta, that and the customer service experience.

PW
 
Then why did they clear the land over there? Apparently Airtran considered it at some point. And in case you haven't flown to a lot of SWA cities like we do on the 88, ATC generally lets SWA do whatever they want. Watch them get assigned the 10/28 transition even from up north. What you don't understand about ATC is that if they're using a "trip" configuration, ATC doesn't really care who gets assigned what, they just randomly assign SOMEBODY the transition. If SWA requests that most of those transitions go to them, they'll probably get it, because ATC DOESN'T CARE WHO DOES IT AS LONG AS SOMEONE DOES IT. Get it?


As I thought, you have no idea how ATC works. No pretending needed.
 
ATC really knows that SW is mission oriented, get the job done. Most legacies are interested in slowing it down and padding the paycheck. Two completely different ways of operating.. and they understand that.

I rode on DL not too long ago and there was a slight delay at the gate for a mechanical. 15-20 minutes. No big deal right? Once taxing out, the CA was moving at 1mph for 25+ minutes to get to the runway....AFTER the delay at the gate. (and no, there was no traffic or flow time) His goal was to maximize his paycheck and could careless about the people behind him. Just one example of the stuff that happens everday.

I don't know where you get the idea that "most legacies" are interested in slowing down ATC, but this "legacy" captain isn't. Don't get me wrong, I don't taxi just under rotation speed like SWA, but over 20 kts on straightaways is pretty routine for me.

Seems as if SWA pilots are the arrogant ones around here to me.
 
Puff,

Maybe I painted with too broad a brush...but I do see it very often. If you are one of the guys that uses his head with taxi speed and time management for the customers, then that's awesome. That's what you should be doing.

There are plenty of others that are in it just for themselves. It's sad.
 
Red: What you don't understand is that, at least at a certain level, you have to share the airspace. But you're going to fugure it out someday. The SWA, road rage taxi mentality is not going to suit you flying international. You start flying places with one or two runways that have a lot of arrivals at once and ATC isn't going to let you pull the crap. And you are painting "with too broad a brush" and it shows a real lack of SA on your part of what goes on at other carriers. When your FAs have to start doing a longer demo (over water) and they have to do it in two languages your taxi will slow down. Think dude. It's kind of like when Chase got on here and started asking etops questions.
 
Yup. Think it's the more recently hired ones. Pretty sad bunch.

Yup . . . . and they're the same ones that somehow feel entitled to the Captain seats in the planes AAI is bringing to the merger. . . . . . and are threatening to stink up the place if they don't get their way. :erm:
 
Yup . . . . and they're the same ones that somehow feel entitled to the Captain seats in the planes AAI is bringing to the merger. . . . . . and are threatening to stink up the place if they don't get their way. :erm:

If you could explain how that is Fair and Equitable to me then maybe I'll agree with you.

Gup
 

Latest resources

Back
Top