Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SkyWest/Republic & Scope

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Moderator Reviewed:

No violation of the ToS. Quit reporting things that aren't ToS violations.

Thanks,

/mod
 
ASA or Delta? ASA
ASA or United? ASA
ASA or Southwest? Southwest
ASA or FedEx? FedEx
ASA or UPS? UPS
ASA or American? ASA
ASA or CAL? ASA

My reasons for each differ a bit, but the general theme is starting over and becoming furlough fodder. I know the risks and with risks come rewards, but if it ain't broke....


What? You are nuts. ASA over Delta? What are you smoking? Furlough fodder when they have more cash on hand than anyone else, and are in expansion mode with recent hiring and picking up MD90s? Throw in a bunch of retirements coming up from FNWA pilots, and I would say it is a fairly safe bet. I wish I could get an interview over there. You really don't know what you are talking about. The General is right to call you hairy palm.
 
Last edited:
Let's see here:

Days off I want - yes

Can bid holidays/weekends off - yes

Can bid decent trips - yes

Work with good people - yes

Happy with the size of my equipment - It's all how you use it.

Money - Could be more but it pays the bills and buys the toys

Any danger of furlough - friggin' remote

What does a "major" have to offer?
 
Last edited:
When you fly for a regional, your fighting for scraps from the Major airline partner. Someone will always be your Daddy.
 
When you fly for a regional, your fighting for scraps from the Major airline partner. Someone will always be your Daddy.


What does this mean? This is absurdly stupid. I have a few attorney friends. One makes crazy bank with a huge lawfirm. Another makes right around 100K prosecuting in a moderate sized city. The prosecutor graduated higher in the same class as the other. None of these attorneys sit around in a forum and bash each other for their chosen position.

Play the same game with doctors. Small town practice v. big city plastic surgeon. Is the big shot plastic surgeon the general practitioner's "daddy"?

In the words of Mr. Yosemite Sam....pilots "is sooooo stupid".
 
What does this mean? This is absurdly stupid. I have a few attorney friends. One makes crazy bank with a huge lawfirm. Another makes right around 100K prosecuting in a moderate sized city. The prosecutor graduated higher in the same class as the other. None of these attorneys sit around in a forum and bash each other for their chosen position.

Play the same game with doctors. Small town practice v. big city plastic surgeon. Is the big shot plastic surgeon the general practitioner's "daddy"?

In the words of Mr. Yosemite Sam....pilots "is sooooo stupid".

Does your crazy bank liar friend control the amount of work your other liar friend gets? Your comparison is retarded. I have plenty of friends in the medical field but they don't have scope clauses that restricts others work. So what he/she said makes complete sense.

Your point would be valid except for the fact that the major pilots have control. Have they used that control wisely lately? Of course not but the commuters are still the bitch to them and hopefully they soon will make the commuters a scarce entity.
 
Our #2 guy came into our recurrent ground and stated the following:

If scope is not relaxed by mainline carriers in the next wave of negotiations (which most airline CEO's state is a realistic assumption, he added), companies like SkyWest Inc and Republic Airways will have a choice: shrink and die or compete and survive.

Now, why would he say something like this?

UAL/Cont have announced that they will continue their 50+ seat protection. This is going to be the way of the future. Many mainliner's have had guys on furlough for 10+ years and are over it. Let the regional's shrink and the mainline grow....Make the move as soon as you can. For the senior guys that cry foul; you knew the risks when you stayed at your regional - get over it. The majority at DAL also wants the smaller jets and we will fly them for appropriate rates. In fact the E-170+ size jet rates are already set in the current contract. Good luck to all, the next 5-10 years are going to be REALLY interesting!

Baja.
 
UAL/Cont have announced that they will continue their 50+ seat protection. This is going to be the way of the future. Many mainliner's have had guys on furlough for 10+ years and are over it. Let the regional's shrink and the mainline grow....Make the move as soon as you can. For the senior guys that cry foul; you knew the risks when you stayed at your regional - get over it. The majority at DAL also wants the smaller jets and we will fly them for appropriate rates. In fact the E-170+ size jet rates are already set in the current contract. Good luck to all, the next 5-10 years are going to be REALLY interesting!

Baja.

It definitely will not take 10 years.

A healthy airtran, jetblue, and the monolith SWA have driven 70 seat and smaller aircraft to the graveyard. You simply can't compete against strong LLC's with an RJ. This has little to do with passenger "little jet" mentality and a lot to do with CASM, RASM and yields.

There are a few markets where a small jet can charge a premium only because an LCC doesn't serve those markets.

There are also a few markets that provide a significant amount of feed for their mainline partner.

Other than those few markets, the 70 seat and smaller jet is dead. Republic learned quickly that RJ's don't work against airtran, even with their laughable rj pay rates. Thankfully Republic is making massive capacity adjustments very quickly.

Continental and UAL already have 50 seat protection, it is called the economy. Take a look at the mainline carriers that have unlimited or very large 50-70 seat allowances. How many of those gauge aircraft are being added? How many of those gauge aircraft are being parked?

Scope needs to focus on the 190 and larger aircraft. That is the real threat today and for the foreseeable future.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top