Super Monkey
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- Posts
- 63
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
- Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
- Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
- Share the passion for aviation
- Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun
What are the projected retirements for SWA?
- Thread starter Super Monkey
- Start date
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
- Invite your friends
- Share the passion of aviation
- Friendliest aviation community on the web
Dumb Pilot
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2006
- Posts
- 1,570
Saluki Dawg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2002
- Posts
- 395
No joke. Our retirement picture is really not good at all, and doesn't pick up until the mid to late 2020's, I believe...
SD,
I would agree that SWA will not see the unprecedented type of new hire training that occurred in the the 90's and mid-'00's.
Our junior most CA and FOs have taken a triple whammy and the new non-normal has caused unprecedented stagnation compared to recent years. Their professionalism in dealing with this has been remarkable.
From listening to CM when he spoke to our training class I think the GO is getting financials in order and is optimistic that revenue streams are returning to levels that will allow measured growth in '11 and the following years. Near international flying will be in SWA's future as will be more cities like CHS and GSP in which mid-size cities that can generate 12-20 very full and profitable flights will begin to open up new opportunities. Not every new city will need to have the potential to fly 40-50 flights. Despite that BOS will expand a lot in the next 18 months most likely from the original 10 flights, 26 flights in Sept '10 and probably double that a year later (total of 2 more gates are avaiable above the 3 SWA will have by Sept '10). Unproductive intrastate CA flights are being moved to more profitable pairings....good for all SWA pilots.
Once Mexico and the Caribbean open up and mature, SWA will only wonder why they didn't do it sooner along with the success of other revenue streams that seem to be paying off adding to the bottom line which generates growth. Coupled with the turmoil in other labor groups/looming deadlines and other airlines continuing to hemorrage while pissing off their customers, more customers will drift to SWA....see this blog from a first time flyer that is occurring every day when first time flyers fly with us:
The Southwest Airlines experience through the eyes of a legacy elite flier
I would agree that SWA will not see the unprecedented type of new hire training that occurred in the the 90's and mid-'00's.
Our junior most CA and FOs have taken a triple whammy and the new non-normal has caused unprecedented stagnation compared to recent years. Their professionalism in dealing with this has been remarkable.
From listening to CM when he spoke to our training class I think the GO is getting financials in order and is optimistic that revenue streams are returning to levels that will allow measured growth in '11 and the following years. Near international flying will be in SWA's future as will be more cities like CHS and GSP in which mid-size cities that can generate 12-20 very full and profitable flights will begin to open up new opportunities. Not every new city will need to have the potential to fly 40-50 flights. Despite that BOS will expand a lot in the next 18 months most likely from the original 10 flights, 26 flights in Sept '10 and probably double that a year later (total of 2 more gates are avaiable above the 3 SWA will have by Sept '10). Unproductive intrastate CA flights are being moved to more profitable pairings....good for all SWA pilots.
Once Mexico and the Caribbean open up and mature, SWA will only wonder why they didn't do it sooner along with the success of other revenue streams that seem to be paying off adding to the bottom line which generates growth. Coupled with the turmoil in other labor groups/looming deadlines and other airlines continuing to hemorrage while pissing off their customers, more customers will drift to SWA....see this blog from a first time flyer that is occurring every day when first time flyers fly with us:
The Southwest Airlines experience through the eyes of a legacy elite flier
by Elizabeth Smith
As some of you may know, I am an experienced traveler who holds elite status on a legacy carrier. Last Thursday, June 3, I took my first flight on Southwest Airlines and I wanted to share my experience.
WN 220 RDU-MDW-AUS 6:55 pm-10:55 pm with a 30-minute stop in MDW
Actual: 8:30 pm -12:05 am due to weather/ground stops in the BWI/IAD/DCA area
Pre-boarding experience: The Southwest attitude and service was completely different than what I often experience on legacy airlines. Everyone I encountered was nice. The check-in agent said to me, “Now don’t get off the plane in MDW, stay on!” Very nice of her, even though I already knew.
There was no crowding around the gate area agents, even though we were delayed. Passengers seemed calm and stayed seated until it was their turn to get beside their boarding “pole position.”
Boarding: Boarding was very orderly. I was actually amazed. I watched it for a few of the flights. It is as if Southwest passengers are trained. When the planes came in and people deplaned, A boarding position passengers stood up and stood by their “pole position” and were just chatting amongst each other. There was no rudeness or impatience. Then like clockwork, the agents started boarding with positions A1-15, Business Select and A List, and as boarding passes were scanned, the computer made the famous ding sound each time.
Passengers: Most were businesspeople and what I would call “Southwest pros.” Passengers knew exactly how everything worked and what to expect.
Seating: I pre-paid Early Bird Check-in for $10 and had boarding position A26. I selected the “quasi” exit row aisle, 11D, two-seat side, on the RDU-MDW segment of the trip. I stayed on the plane in MDW since I was continuing on, so I was able to select the real exit row aisle, 11C, on the second segment.
In-flight service: The in-flight service was the best I’ve ever seen. There were three flight attendants for the cabin and they served the cabin in thirds. Each walked down their section with their handheld devices for purchases and a notepad taking drink orders.
They hand-carried the drinks to passengers using drink trays. After serving drinks, they passed through the aisle with the snack baskets. On my first flight, my flight attendant comped our adult beverages due to the delay. On both flights, the flight attendants passed out two snacks per passenger – peanuts, pretzels, and Nabisco Cheese Nips (100-calorie package.)
There were no beverage or food carts. When we landed in MDW, one other passenger and I were the only ones continuing to AUS, so we saw how they turned the plane in about 15 minutes. The flight attendants scurried through the cabin, picking up trash, arranging the seat belts, putting up tray tables, and turning off lights. Catering and service workers came aboard and catered the plane with snacks and drinks and cleaned/serviced the lavs. It was amazing to see how quickly they prepared the cabin for the next round of passengers. It reminded me of a NASCAR pit stop. Then the pilot gave the go-ahead to start boarding.
Grade = A+, despite the weather delay. Now I understand why so many travelers love Southwest.
As some of you may know, I am an experienced traveler who holds elite status on a legacy carrier. Last Thursday, June 3, I took my first flight on Southwest Airlines and I wanted to share my experience.
WN 220 RDU-MDW-AUS 6:55 pm-10:55 pm with a 30-minute stop in MDW
Actual: 8:30 pm -12:05 am due to weather/ground stops in the BWI/IAD/DCA area
Pre-boarding experience: The Southwest attitude and service was completely different than what I often experience on legacy airlines. Everyone I encountered was nice. The check-in agent said to me, “Now don’t get off the plane in MDW, stay on!” Very nice of her, even though I already knew.
There was no crowding around the gate area agents, even though we were delayed. Passengers seemed calm and stayed seated until it was their turn to get beside their boarding “pole position.”
Boarding: Boarding was very orderly. I was actually amazed. I watched it for a few of the flights. It is as if Southwest passengers are trained. When the planes came in and people deplaned, A boarding position passengers stood up and stood by their “pole position” and were just chatting amongst each other. There was no rudeness or impatience. Then like clockwork, the agents started boarding with positions A1-15, Business Select and A List, and as boarding passes were scanned, the computer made the famous ding sound each time.
Passengers: Most were businesspeople and what I would call “Southwest pros.” Passengers knew exactly how everything worked and what to expect.
Seating: I pre-paid Early Bird Check-in for $10 and had boarding position A26. I selected the “quasi” exit row aisle, 11D, two-seat side, on the RDU-MDW segment of the trip. I stayed on the plane in MDW since I was continuing on, so I was able to select the real exit row aisle, 11C, on the second segment.
In-flight service: The in-flight service was the best I’ve ever seen. There were three flight attendants for the cabin and they served the cabin in thirds. Each walked down their section with their handheld devices for purchases and a notepad taking drink orders.
They hand-carried the drinks to passengers using drink trays. After serving drinks, they passed through the aisle with the snack baskets. On my first flight, my flight attendant comped our adult beverages due to the delay. On both flights, the flight attendants passed out two snacks per passenger – peanuts, pretzels, and Nabisco Cheese Nips (100-calorie package.)
There were no beverage or food carts. When we landed in MDW, one other passenger and I were the only ones continuing to AUS, so we saw how they turned the plane in about 15 minutes. The flight attendants scurried through the cabin, picking up trash, arranging the seat belts, putting up tray tables, and turning off lights. Catering and service workers came aboard and catered the plane with snacks and drinks and cleaned/serviced the lavs. It was amazing to see how quickly they prepared the cabin for the next round of passengers. It reminded me of a NASCAR pit stop. Then the pilot gave the go-ahead to start boarding.
Grade = A+, despite the weather delay. Now I understand why so many travelers love Southwest.
Last edited:
Taco Rocket
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2005
- Posts
- 303
Interesting. I wonder why management would want to grow, really. Growing would assume more risk for the company when they can simply contract with someone else to assume that risk and maintain many of the financial rewards.
Moving forward, do you see WN as a financial juggernaut that just happens to run an airline? Just playing the financial cards they have, without drawing more from a metaphorical pile (by expanding), they have been able to put competitors out of business, force others into bankruptcy, make a fortune in the derivates market, and keep a respectable stock growing and stable in a turbulent industry. Why change any of that?
Chase,
I would say that the experience of that one person is more a reflection of how SWA management treats and values their employees. If the other carriers were to ever start treating their employees with respect and truly valued them for what they bring to the table in the process of customer service, watch out SWA
Sloth,
I agree with you 100%. The crews of other airline companies are no different than the folks at SWA...they're smart, talented, type A personalities that given the proper environment will blossum and provide customers with what they want...to be treated with respect and fairly.
That occurs everyday at the legacies by many of the employees and those customers who experience it are pleasantly surprised and bring it to the attention of management. The sad fact of the matter is there are many other employees encounted by other customers who don't come across that way, the reasons are many. Like a dog that has been beaten for so long, it is hard to break the vicious circle.
Management/leadership is certainly at fault but personal responsibility (certainly something that seems to be out of vogue in our country, particularly among politicians) is still exactly that...up to the person invovled. Colleen has been quoted as saying something to the effect, "You come to work with the attitude you woke up with...I expect it to be a good one because that is the person we hired"
SWA carried 8% of domestic traffic when I was hired in '99...it now carries around double that to 16%...I don't expect that to double again in the next 10 years but as the country's largest domestic passenger carrier I don't see us shrinking or stepping away from viable growth options measured against the risks of financial stress that is always inevitable in the world we live in now. Other airlines have and freely use the option of furloughs that SWA doesn't wish to exercise...that creates an inevitable level of restraint that most carriers don't have to deal with IMHO.
An original SWA hire left in '73 for DAL...I met him on here...great guy who has a son flying with Presidential Airlines in Afghanistan. Anyway, he spent 30+ yrs there, flying international 767 and all the other good deals...he candidly told me he regretted leaving SWA to go to DAL and if he had to do it over with he would've made other choices...others in his shoes might make a different assessment...everyone is different and the final call is at the end of the career. I hope those who have chosen SWA have no regrets when they come off that fini flight, I know I will.:beer:
I agree with you 100%. The crews of other airline companies are no different than the folks at SWA...they're smart, talented, type A personalities that given the proper environment will blossum and provide customers with what they want...to be treated with respect and fairly.
That occurs everyday at the legacies by many of the employees and those customers who experience it are pleasantly surprised and bring it to the attention of management. The sad fact of the matter is there are many other employees encounted by other customers who don't come across that way, the reasons are many. Like a dog that has been beaten for so long, it is hard to break the vicious circle.
Management/leadership is certainly at fault but personal responsibility (certainly something that seems to be out of vogue in our country, particularly among politicians) is still exactly that...up to the person invovled. Colleen has been quoted as saying something to the effect, "You come to work with the attitude you woke up with...I expect it to be a good one because that is the person we hired"
SWA carried 8% of domestic traffic when I was hired in '99...it now carries around double that to 16%...I don't expect that to double again in the next 10 years but as the country's largest domestic passenger carrier I don't see us shrinking or stepping away from viable growth options measured against the risks of financial stress that is always inevitable in the world we live in now. Other airlines have and freely use the option of furloughs that SWA doesn't wish to exercise...that creates an inevitable level of restraint that most carriers don't have to deal with IMHO.
An original SWA hire left in '73 for DAL...I met him on here...great guy who has a son flying with Presidential Airlines in Afghanistan. Anyway, he spent 30+ yrs there, flying international 767 and all the other good deals...he candidly told me he regretted leaving SWA to go to DAL and if he had to do it over with he would've made other choices...others in his shoes might make a different assessment...everyone is different and the final call is at the end of the career. I hope those who have chosen SWA have no regrets when they come off that fini flight, I know I will.:beer:
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
When a top guy at Delta retires, there is a huge amount of movement. Think about it, a 777 Capt leaves, then a 767-400 Capt moves up to the 777, then a 767-300ER Captain moves up to the 767-400, then an 737-800 Captain moves up to the 767, then an A320 or Md90 Capt moves up to the 738, etc.... all the way from DC9 FO or MD88 FO----everyone moves up. It might be 15 movements for one retirement. Some years coming up have more than 700 retirements in one year, and many have 400-500. That is HUGE movement, and pay increases all around. If a guy moves from MD88FO to 767 FO, there could be a $20 an hour difference. And, if you stay on a narrowbody instead of moving up the ladder, you can make extra money by being senior and picking up greenslips for double pay. And regardless of your movement at SWA, you will always still have to fly through ELP, a major downer.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Upgrades will be longer than they ever have been at SWA. The stars are starting to align and the financials will work themselves out. Growth will return by late this year or early next but it won't be enough to override the 10 year FO.
10 year upgrades will be the norm, but a superior contract and an ever improving retirement strategy will insure that even the 10 year F/O at SWA has a far superior overall career at SWA over the alternatives at any other airline.
SWA growth will accelerate as the near international and South American markets are developed and mature. (10-15 years until full maturity)
Gary Kelley is no dummy. SWA will grow and we, the pilots, will flurish right along with it.
10 year upgrades will be the norm, but a superior contract and an ever improving retirement strategy will insure that even the 10 year F/O at SWA has a far superior overall career at SWA over the alternatives at any other airline.
SWA growth will accelerate as the near international and South American markets are developed and mature. (10-15 years until full maturity)
Gary Kelley is no dummy. SWA will grow and we, the pilots, will flurish right along with it.
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
What does this lovey dovey stuff have to do with pilot retirement numbers? Chase consistantly diverts the issues to customer satisfaction, which is subjective. How many SWA passengers think of SWA as a "Cattle Car?" Plenty. Reading this snippet from Chase doesn't accurately portray what would happen on most legacy airline flights that are over 2 or 3 hours. A first Class service is a lot different than a "fast and efficient" SWA service on an hour flight. If you got "fast and efficient" on a transcon, you would be castigated to no end.
How many Elite passengers were happy with my last flight from DUS to ATL? A lot. I got them to ATL on time, in a comfortable fashion, and all seemed happy as I said goodbye in person. At the same time, I had a FANTASTIC ice cream sundae over Greenland watching the glaciers below. I not only had caramel, but also fudge and strawberry sauce on my sundae. It was really great. So, how was El Paso and the Pizza Hut Personal Supreme Pizza again????
So, again, how do the SWA numbers compare to Delta retirement numbers, and can we see if Chase diverts the subject AGAIN...... Hey, let's see if he throws an article out about free bags........????
Bye Bye--General Lee
Bye Bye--General Lee
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
How do you know that?? Really? I already have 1 greenslip this month ( a 3 day worth in total of 39 hours), topped on my normal 4 European Crossings. I think I probably make a lot more than you do. And, I get ice cream sundaes enroute! Enjoy your peanuts while they last!
Bye Bye--General Lee
general, i love you but i lose all faith when you brag about crappy airline food. it might be good for airline food but it still is overall crappy
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
An ever improving retirement strategy??? Your guys were the leaders in the age 65 change. They probably want to go to 70. Talk about greedy, and they got stock and you didn't way back when too.
Your INTL flights will mature when again?? Say what? Your perfect company culture will come falling down the second Kelly decides he HAS to merge with someone. You won't be able to do a "Frontier" maneuver (make them take a staple or ELSE.....), and the mixing of your list will take away your unity. But, you will still have MAF and ISP.
Bye Bye--General Lee
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
You haven't had Business Elite food recently, have you? I never buy my own food prior to leaving, which says something. I don't know much about the coach food, but the business class food is darn good, with multiple coarses and a choice of desserts (like my sundae). And, it is FREE for crewmembers..... We also do some domestic trips in our category and that means I have done a couple recently. The food domestically wasn't bad. The 1st Class stuff was pretty good (not as good as INTL), and the coach passengers are normally offered food for sale on longer flights, which had some good selections too. Better than the SWA pretzels and peanuts.
Bye Bye--General Lee
redflyer65
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Posts
- 4,456
General, what's so funny is that you are thrilled that your company is wasting hundreds of thousands of dollars by having to PAY FOR 15 training events....absolutely amazing. You don't get it.
I'm glad you were able to score a green slip, in the meantime we can drop or pickup as much as we desire. We have some guys that go after it for 130+ trips a month, at more than your hourly rate. To each their own, but we have those options each and every month.
You braging about one green slip trip really falls short, sorry.
satpak77
Marriott Platinum Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2003
- Posts
- 3,015
Not a defender of the General per-se, however this is the cost of doing business, is it not? Delta should own the sims, the instructors, etc. Who are "they paying" for the training events? How is it a "waste" even if they did, directly or indirectly?
DAL is an international airline, this moving up to the next cockpit didn't start last week. If you believe wikipedia, it is the world's largest airline. So I think these "training costs" have long ago been factored in as part of doing business.
On another note, I see the new UAL/CAL animal a serious threat to DAL. Would we see a DAL/AA merger? Never say never....
Scope out RJ's
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- Posts
- 1,926
There is so much misinformation on his posts, I don't even know where to begin. I'm starting to think that general dooshbag isn't even a DL pilot. He can't be this misinformed.
redflyer65
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Posts
- 4,456
It maybe the cost of doing business, but it cost money to run those sims and pay all the excessive instruction. Are you telling me that Delta is an efficent airlines with all those fleet types? I don't think so. Just another reason why they lose millions of dollars each and every quarter.
The bottom line says it all.
The only Delta planes in see in ELP say Delta CONNECTION on them.
The bottom line says it all.
The only Delta planes in see in ELP say Delta CONNECTION on them.
Scope out RJ's
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- Posts
- 1,926
Like I said there's just so much misinformation put out by general dooshbag that I don't even know where to start! You would think that with 13000 posts he would be able to get something right, but I'm beginning to think that she doesn't even work for Delta.
Genital Lee, a "yes" voter,
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
Watch Out! Scope is on a rampage because I caught him not knowing how common bidding works.......He's going NUTS!!!
Bye Bye--General Lee
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
Incorrect. 2 daily MD88s fly to ELP from ATL. I don't have to fly either of them.
And, Delta now has the ability to put the "right size" airplane on any route they choose. Before the merger, DL's smallest mainline plane was an MD88. Now, DL can choose A319s or DC9s to replace MD88s on certian routes to try to achieve more profits. Heck, they have now replaced CR7s with DC95s on GRR and FNT routes from ATL, which is a good thing! More fleet types can be good and bad for a business, and you obvioulsy can only see the bad.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Last edited:
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
As SatPak77 states, it is the cost of doing business. If you want to be a TRULY Worldwide carrier, you can't just have one fleet type. Delta has to try to fit different type planes into different markets, and trying to find the right fit is key. Once you do that, good things can happen. Delta has worldwide needs, and domestic needs too.
And, a greenslip is a good thing, especially is you use qualifiers and get a free double pay trip to somewhere you actually WANT to go. I enjoy my trips and enjoy my job.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Scope out RJ's This message is hidden because Scope out RJ's is on your ignore list.
View Post
Today, 18:28 Remove user from ignore list
General Lee This message is hidden because General Lee is on your ignore list.
View Post
Today, 18:20 Remove user from ignore list
General Lee This message is hidden because General Lee is on your ignore list.
General Lee This message is hidden because General Lee is on your ignore list.
View Post
Today, 18:24 Remove user from ignore list
General Lee This message is hidden because General Lee is on your ignore list.
General Lee This message is hidden because General Lee is on your ignore list.
General Lee This message is hidden because General Lee is on your ignore list.
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
I don't think AA and DAL together would pass any Gov't scrutiny. Just a guess, but I would think AK and DAL together would again regain the top spot. A codeshare may be ok for now, but if anyone else tries to jump on AK, then maybe it could become more "serious." AK does use DL gates at ATL, MSP, and soon they are moving to term 6 at LAX next to DL. It just seems kinda "cozy."
Bye Bye--General Lee
GL,
I provided the info on retirements. No diversion, I answered the question.
Sundaes are nice but they don't pay the bills at my house and I can't afford to not have the calories.
Sounds like that is a very big perk to to you...good on ya. We have requested that in our Section 6 opener yet but will pass it along to our folks.
Long overnights don't pay the bills either, closing the door and flying does, something we do a lot of.
I bring up customer service because it has a long term impact on hiring....the better you treat the passengers, the more they will fly that airline and tell their friends about airline when the option is available. The more passengers, the greater revenue, fuller airplanes means capacity can be added which equates to more hiring. Growing from 8% to 16% wasn't because I got hired or that we serve peanuts. There were other low fare carriers out there throughout that time attempting to copy what SWA was doing. I would have thought you would've seen the relationship between customer service and hiring, sorry I didn't make it simplier and clearer for you.
I'll look forward to a more accurate portrayal of the life at SWA in the future unless you simply just want to admit you would rather share false imformation.
Why don't we agree that you're the expert on DAL along with those who work there and those who work at SWA who post on here are the experts on SWA, what do you say? At least that way the lurkers can make an honest assessment in deciding which airline they wish to interview with...i.e. Interview Board (maybe time to change that title Lear....hope all is well...tougher to moderator these days with the s--- word being used all the time ).
Cheers GL...have fun on your next international trip...BTW, don't usually share this info but the 3 day I'm on pays nearly $5K at VJA rates...got the lucky phone call and happy to use some of my days off for a good deal like that.
I provided the info on retirements. No diversion, I answered the question.
Sundaes are nice but they don't pay the bills at my house and I can't afford to not have the calories.
Sounds like that is a very big perk to to you...good on ya. We have requested that in our Section 6 opener yet but will pass it along to our folks.Long overnights don't pay the bills either, closing the door and flying does, something we do a lot of.
I bring up customer service because it has a long term impact on hiring....the better you treat the passengers, the more they will fly that airline and tell their friends about airline when the option is available. The more passengers, the greater revenue, fuller airplanes means capacity can be added which equates to more hiring. Growing from 8% to 16% wasn't because I got hired or that we serve peanuts. There were other low fare carriers out there throughout that time attempting to copy what SWA was doing. I would have thought you would've seen the relationship between customer service and hiring, sorry I didn't make it simplier and clearer for you.
I'll look forward to a more accurate portrayal of the life at SWA in the future unless you simply just want to admit you would rather share false imformation.
Why don't we agree that you're the expert on DAL along with those who work there and those who work at SWA who post on here are the experts on SWA, what do you say? At least that way the lurkers can make an honest assessment in deciding which airline they wish to interview with...i.e. Interview Board (maybe time to change that title Lear
....hope all is well...tougher to moderator these days with the s--- word being used all the time ).Cheers GL...have fun on your next international trip...BTW, don't usually share this info but the 3 day I'm on pays nearly $5K at VJA rates...got the lucky phone call and happy to use some of my days off for a good deal like that.
Last edited:
Share this page
Latest resources
-
-
-
-
-
AC 90-89C - Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing HandbookAmateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing Handbook
- Neal
- Updated:
