Hate to rain on anyone's parade, but what makes people think people won't be laid off as a result of this merger? Won't duplicative routes require a reduction in manpower requirements? I realize there aren't many duplicative routes (very complementary route structures) but there is some limited overlap. I see potential revenue synergies (offering new routes to existing corporate clients) but I am sure there are also some flying related costs that can be cut to boost some margins - right?
The 70 seat RJ issue will be interesting to watch with the CAL/UAL CEO. There are definitely some routes in the CAL system that could be filled with 70 seaters (matching supply with demand) and yet CAL scope won't allow it. Should be interesting to watch the tug of war that will result...
Considering there were many more overlaps at Delta/NWA, and this wont be implemented for two years, dont see the furloughs. On top of this there will be 787 deliveries, and in 2 1/2 years massive retirements, talking 600+/yr.
Also, there will be alot of scared over and near 60 guys at CAL sweating their A fund.