SPDBRD747400
World's Favourite Airline
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Posts
- 931
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trust me. Nobody wants your Atlanta flights.
FWA and TYS are 9E mx bases.
Could not have said it better myself!!!I don't recall anyone blaming 9E pilots here! Sensative much?
ASA pilots get upset with DELTA's decisions because we ONLY have ATL and we get pushed out of our only home by companies that fly from and are based at multiple other cities!
Stop by our lounge. Popcorn on us.
Welcome to Atlanta. Waddayahav? Copy dat!
ASA consistently is the loser when it comes to who flies where........
It is just that no one wants to be sitting in their Lazy Boy, with a good Boons Farm buzz, and have a stupid 50 seat jet come crashing through their roof.This may not want to be what people want to hear, but Delta Air Lines is the one who owns that flying and can do what they want with it. It is just business, no need to "blame" Pinnacle or any of their pilots.
It is just that no one wants to be sitting in their Lazy Boy, with a good Boons Farm buzz, and have a stupid 50 seat jet come crashing through their roof.
PBR
Because they are so cheap compared to us, when you pay your employees next to nothing just like (Mesa and Gojets) they are so much more desirable. I hate this race to the bottom! Here's hoping for good news at ASA soon!When all ASA basically has is an ATL hub (Until IAD for United, which comes at the expense of losing ((loosing)) 6 airplanes) it does blow when someone else comes in and flies routes we have been doing for years. Why does it suck? Because that just means less flying for ASA, as you do not see us picking up routes out of SLC, DTW or MEM. We seem to be chained to ATL and a little CVG flying. So, our furloughed pilots, downgraded Captains and former lineholders can attest, to us this just means less flying. Whn our lines keep getting fewer and fewer and fewer it does suck to hear that someone else is replacing our routes. I get that it is Deltas flying and all that.....but we have to wonder why they keep replacing us in ATL? It is also funny how when we were in sec 6 negotiations we were constantly told the reason we could never get new flying was we were negotiating, they didn't know are future costs, blah blah blah. We even lost airframes and orders. It's funny how another airline in the same kind of negotiations seems to be able to keep picking things up, even after they voted down a TA. Curious.
Imagine how pissed you would be if they voted Yes on the TA.... At least give them credit for that!When all ASA basically has is an ATL hub (Until IAD for United, which comes at the expense of losing ((loosing)) 6 airplanes) it does blow when someone else comes in and flies routes we have been doing for years. Why does it suck? Because that just means less flying for ASA, as you do not see us picking up routes out of SLC, DTW or MEM. We seem to be chained to ATL and a little CVG flying. So, our furloughed pilots, downgraded Captains and former lineholders can attest, to us this just means less flying. Whn our lines keep getting fewer and fewer and fewer it does suck to hear that someone else is replacing our routes. I get that it is Deltas flying and all that.....but we have to wonder why they keep replacing us in ATL? It is also funny how when we were in sec 6 negotiations we were constantly told the reason we could never get new flying was we were negotiating, they didn't know are future costs, blah blah blah. We even lost airframes and orders. It's funny how another airline in the same kind of negotiations seems to be able to keep picking things up, even after they voted down a TA. Curious.