Citation Air Announces Recalls then quitely CUT's PAY!!!

[DAS at 10/250]

And your limited cranial capacity assumes that anyone who doesn't worship Bill O'Reilly must be a loyal MSNBC viewer. There aren't just two sides to the "news," either.

Again, public education shines through. So, since I don't watch MSNBC I must watch FOX? For the record, you are aware that there are more news sources then NBC, CBS, ABC, and FOX. Right?

 

[CA1900]

Again, public education shines through.

Didn't go to a state school, but thanks for your concern.

So, since I don't watch MSNBC I must watch FOX? For the record, you are aware that there are more news sources then NBC, CBS, ABC, and FOX. Right?

Right. That was my point.

I never said you must watch Fox -- what I did was challenge your assumption that Dooker is "buried in MSNBC" because he believes the GOP neglects the working man. Why would his statement lead you to believe that? You imply there are only two "sides" in news in the same post where you decry the belief that there are only two "sides" in politics! That's what I found ironic.

I don't think the written word is doing either one of us well tonight. :laugh:

 

[glasspilot]

This has been the trend. This is not the first thread to go this way. For the past year it always goes the exact same way;

1. Someone posts a thread on XYZ
2. Some Fox watcher posts some reference to how it's the fault of Obama or a snarky comment like this thread and RCAs post. (RCA started it on this thread but it's always the same type of post that gets it going and it's always from the right)
3. Sane people stand up and defend and then get attacked for doing so with loads of insults like DAS at 10/250 with his " limited cranial capacity" comment.

It's the same pattern time and time again and it's always the right with their sore loser mentality that starts it and their bully tactics that sling insults that perpetuate it.

 

[UAL-GSO]

Holy ******************** not again. Why don't you guys just start your own damn thread. Not everyone wants to wade through your political arguments just to get some details on the original thread topic. It's just plain rude.

 

[clydefastly]

Why is it that every Citation Air thread gets quickly hijacked into a political gang bang. Go to the non-aviatin political section of FI. All of this "how dare you presume to assume that I a butt pirate or a wing nut" BS is way beyond annoying, and I'm sure the CA guys don't appreciate it.

Rant over:uzi:

Respectfully yours,
Clyde

 

[clydefastly]

Oh UAL types faster than I do

 

[dime line]

Man my Mc Nuggets only had 4 tonight, instead of 5 today.

 

[johnsonrod]

I hear Avantair is hiring...

 

[RCA]

Why is it that every Citation Air thread gets quickly hijacked into a political gang bang. Go to the non-aviatin political section of FI. All of this "how dare you presume to assume that I a butt pirate or a wing nut" BS is way beyond annoying, and I'm sure the CA guys don't appreciate it.

Rant over:uzi:

Respectfully yours,
Clyde

Why?
Because unless the madness is stopped in Washington D.C. we will be just another nation living under corrupt government rule. And CitationAir will matter far less than it does now.

After all, the jet airplanes we fly emit a toxic substance called CO2 and therefore will need to be "regulated" sometime in the next decade." http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091207-709708.html

 

[glasspilot]

There's the reason, right there.

Fix that and the threads will stay non-political.