av8tordude23
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Posts
- 75
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unfortunately RAH has the lowest FO pay in the industry, for jets. How can you compete with that? Great job RAH pilots, enjoy the 190’s.
Full of LUV said:If RAH wants to operate them at such low rates, it's time for ALPA to do something about it and have all ALPA carriers amend their contracts to ban RAH pilots from a free ride until the carrier offers appropriate compensation for the mainline 190.
Wow...that really tells the story, right there.They've already been denied jumpseats at Gojet.
Quite sad for the US domestic airline scene as US and Jetblue tried to operate the 190 at some semblence of a mainline rate, now the US part is gone. It's going to be Jetblue holding the bag defending the 190 as a mainline machine.
If RAH wants to operate them at such low rates, it's time for ALPA to do something about it and have all ALPA carriers amend their contracts to ban RAH pilots from a free ride until the carrier offers appropriate compensation for the mainline 190. Which ALPA carrier wouldn't go for that? DAL, UAL, heck even SWA and Airtran all want to compete against RAH's 190's on an even basis, not at some subpar labor basis.
`
Advocating a jumpseat war because pilots operating under a 6+ year old contract and deep into negotiations aren't paid what a particular airframe (that they didn't have when said 6+ year old contract was ratified) "deserves"?
You never go full retard, even on Flightinfo...and that post just went there and then some.
Considering how ALPA didn't ban JetBlue pilots from a free ride when their A320 rates were 60-70% the industry average (how quickly some people forget), however, I wouldn't hold my breath.
Advocating a jumpseat war because pilots operating under a 6+ year old contract and deep into negotiations aren't paid what a particular airframe (that they didn't have when said 6+ year old contract was ratified) "deserves"?
You never go full retard, even on Flightinfo...and that post just went there and then some.
Considering how ALPA didn't ban JetBlue pilots from a free ride when their A320 rates were 60-70% the industry average (how quickly some people forget), however, I wouldn't hold my breath.
Full retard...hahaha
Full of LUV said:ALPA has nads
The law of unintended consequences must be a foreign concept to you...to say nothing of economics, the RLA, reality, or a half-dozen other important topics contrary to your pie-in-the-sky "proposal".What's the problem with this scenario? If the regional pay was standardized and indexed to inflation by the union, you'd be amazed at how the company would have to play ball, or they would not be able to support their schedules. How many Comair pilots live in greater NY area? How many regional pilots live in Hawaii? How many RAH pilots commute all over the place? All subsidized by the industry in the way of jumpseat and pass travel.
Sure it does...
That's why ALPA National welcomed CAL scabs back with open arms, and why legacy airline ALPA MECs and pilot groups have sold their scope and allowed thousands of mainline pilot jobs to be outsourced to regional carriers in ever-increasing larger small jets.
The law of unintended consequences must be a foreign concept to you...to say nothing of economics, the RLA, reality, or a half-dozen other important topics contrary to your pie-in-the-sky "proposal".
Sure it does...
That's why ALPA National welcomed CAL scabs back with open arms, and why legacy airline ALPA MECs and pilot groups have sold their scope and allowed thousands of mainline pilot jobs to be outsourced to regional carriers in ever-increasing larger small jets.
The law of unintended consequences must be a foreign concept to you...to say nothing of economics, the RLA, reality, or a half-dozen other important topics contrary to your pie-in-the-sky "proposal".