PuffDriver
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2002
- Posts
- 1,027
You are right. Dig and you'll be able to confirm they are still running off the economic analysis performed for bankruptcy concessions.
A LOT has CHANGED since then and we need new numbers. I don't know why there is such resistance to updating our analysis. Seems like it would be required to prepare for C2012 in any event. Any idea why they are so dead set against even considering scope restoration?
If taken in baby steps, the business case for Compass and the E170's is pretty easy. Due to representational issues the case for the CRJ derivatives is more complicated, but any time a 90 to 100 passenger jet leaves the gate with 14 to 24 fewer passengers than it could carry, that is a loss of revenue. Revenue that could pay a "Delta" crew.
To take the contrary view, US Air apparently does not like their E190's. Maybe they are just trying to negotiate down lease rates they don't want to pay in today's age of, "eh' lets just not pay our bills."
Can't disagree with anything there, except they are adamant that the numbers ARE current. I tend to believe them. Just look at an 11% DC for everyone on the Delta property. That alone probably pushes mainline over the top on the jet. The others are probably getting close, especially with the longevity that today's regional pilot brings to the table. As you have seen, that apparently is coming under fire from management with the almost daily shuffling of flying from the expensive providers to the more inexpensive.
My intent, at least one of them, is to bring some fresh perspective to the fight, and indeed take a long hard look at reigning in some of that 70+ flying at or before C2012. I'd rather see how the 50 seat flying shakes out from management's side before we address that, and of course the rest of the contract needs improvement as well. I definitely cannot envision a scenario where I could vote to relax scope even further--save 1,000,000 signing bonuses per capita