Fubijaakr
Seniority is Forever
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2003
- Posts
- 2,537
Based on what I've been reading from the EWR Council's Magenta Line newsletter, it sounds like the FAs pretty much think they run the show all the time anyway.![]()
You mean they don't?
:beer:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based on what I've been reading from the EWR Council's Magenta Line newsletter, it sounds like the FAs pretty much think they run the show all the time anyway.![]()
Exactly. What year at the commuters do they let the FO's start landing? Especially when they dont even have a Commercial License.
ALPA is who let the scope go, not the regionals. It used to be that ALL jet flying was to be done by mainline. Dumbest thing ALPA ever did was fall for the, "but it's a REGIONAL jet. See? Regional is right in the name...you don't want to fly THAT!" line.
50 seats turned into 100+ seats pretty quick.
I think it's more accurate to say that the mainline pilots chose other priorities over capturing the regional jet. It wasn't that they liked RJs less, but they liked $$$ more.
My target age for retirement is 49 or sooner. I will take a COLA by then too. Flying wears you out. I don't fly too much (250 or less per year) and long term health is one of my reasons for that.
Have you done the math for age 49 retirement? Unless you only think you're going to live to age 70, you probably need to put away close to half your take home pay. The kind of ultra-agressive investing that would allow "normal" 20% retirement savings to allow you to retire that early could just as easily (and more likely) bankrupt your retirement funds and leave you unable to afford age 60 retirement like many of the guys who are staying past 60 now.
Or perhaps you are counting on CAL to take care of you with a future contract that actually contains a respectable retirement plan?