We are over a year from this. If CAL dropped them, CJC would get an injunction seeing as there is no basis for assuming Colgan is unsafe.
Really? No basis?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are over a year from this. If CAL dropped them, CJC would get an injunction seeing as there is no basis for assuming Colgan is unsafe.
That's what you have to say everyday when you go to work for them. Reality is they have a body count that is difficult to overlook.We are over a year from this. If CAL dropped them, CJC would get an injunction seeing as there is no basis for assuming Colgan is unsafe.
This would cost a LOT of money for CAL. Getting out of that contract early would be over $100 million they would pay to PNCL.
That's what you have to say everyday when you go to work for them. Reality is they have a body count that is difficult to overlook.
PBR
This would cost a LOT of money for CAL. Getting out of that contract early would be over $100 million they would pay to PNCL.
We are over a year from this. If CAL dropped them, CJC would get an injunction seeing as there is no basis for assuming Colgan is unsafe.
But it's still far less both in total numbers and as percentages of total block hours than most. What's your point?
So everytime an airline has a crash they should automatically go out of business? I hope you don't honestly believe CJC has the monopoly on any of the shenanigans going on in the industry.
Since you're the expert, what is their total "body count" to date since their first day in business, compared to every other carrier? We'll wait.....
UHHH,
You you might have those numbers, but my nearest count off the top of my head Colgan/Peaknuckle has 50+ and two airframes as total loss. Which doesn't bode well for them. Careless and reckless comes to mind.
PBR