Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Deleted

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
He's worse than an idiot...he's an idiot with a following...

Maybe all the O'Reilly fans in the aviaiton industry will watch this sh1t and think, maybe, just maybe the rest of his babble is just as accurately reported...
 
Wow, I used to actually watch him from time to time because he was Mr. "no spin." He usually had that no BS type style that I could some what respect. All of that is out the window after watching the vid. I can never take him seriously again. What a DB.
 
What specifically is your problem with what he said? Are you denying some problems with the Airbus engines that have been documented or the AD that came out? Do you not think the NTSB is or has asked the same question O'Reilly did? Is this a Fox News bash or will you accept the Wall Streets Journals article? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123128402658958947.html

Have you definitely determined the cause and contributory factors that caused the crash of Cactus flight 1549?
 
Last edited:
Let me see if I get this. Bill is usually bashing sue-happy laywers but in this case he is advocating it?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top