wmuflyguy
flunky
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2004
- Posts
- 2,006
I think he was talking about business jets in general being questionable.
Then he is an even bigger idiot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think he was talking about business jets in general being questionable.
I wonder if the two Falcons his employer, Vanity Fair, operates out of GSO are also abhorrent.The Legacy occupies a position toward the high end of private jets—among airplanes like Gulfstreams, Challengers, and Falcons—which by political, ethical, and environmental measures are abhorrent creations, but which nonetheless are masterworks of personal transportation. The Legacy weighs 50,000 pounds fully loaded, and is powered by twin Rolls-Royce turbofan engines mounted aft against the fuselage, delivering a total of 16,000 pounds of thrust at a price to the atmosphere and global oil reserves of about 300 gallons an hour.
Those who flew for PanAm, TWA and the like 40 or more years ago would be grossly appalled at the lack of skills these two possessed (the Legacy crew).
Third world controllers manage to get two airplanes in the same piece of sky and they hit each other. These guys got a crippled plane on the ground in the middle of the Amazon and save everyone on board. What an appalling lack of skills. Yeah.
You forget to mention that this was with the help of the 1st world pilots that turned the transponder off right?
Wanderlust said:And I have to agree, as much as I'd like to fly one, bizjets are abhorrent most of the time.
I was impressed with the article. Well written, technically accurate. I don't think he's demonizing these guys, just writing frankly about the incident. And I have to agree, as much as I'd like to fly one, bizjets are abhorrent most of the time.
I think the article is for the most part OK. I just think it's in the wrong magazine.