Ultra Grump
Mmmmm...beer....
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Posts
- 974
Relevance is apparently overrated in the VOR household....because the BBJs were such big sellers, and the rest of the fleet is mostly all still so "new"![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Relevance is apparently overrated in the VOR household....because the BBJs were such big sellers, and the rest of the fleet is mostly all still so "new"![]()
Relevance is apparently overrated in the VOR household.
... WORSE YET, the NJ's guys dumped IBT perhaps so we won't be the same union, so their BIGGER group will have no qualms about stapling the entire flops group to the bottom. .....
Get the facts straight. GF is right. This is the false accusation that I responded to. My husband is one of those who led the Independence movement and I know exactly why my family gave up (and are still giving) so much of our personal time to form an in-house union/association. It is for the reasons I explained and I find this absurdly paranoid suggestion insulting to the NJ pilotgroup who only wished to have complete control over their destiny and their money. Posters seeking to start ugly rumors shouldn't be surprised when those in the know set the record straight. NJW
B19, if the First Lady told me that the President was planning to invade some country in the next two weeks I'd believe her.
You can agree or disagree if NJW's husband should talk to her or not about union stuff, but the fact is he does. Right or wrong, he does.
So...as a result she has an opinion. She decides to post that opinion here. It's a free country. I do believe each and every pilot and poster like you know that and as such there is little conflict. My point is there is little deception going on. Hell, her name is NETJETWIFE. That says it all. She is very upfront about her position.
If you're mad at her husband for talking to her then maybe you could ask her nicely for her husbands cell number and you could call him and complain.
Is it possible to craft a scope that will survive through:
- a company that has a bigger (and anti-union) group of pilots acquires or is acquired by Flops?
- a company that has a bigger (DIFFERENT union) pilot group that acquires or is acquired by Flops (and may staple...what if THEY have an iron clad scope clause)?
-Flops selling off the operation in parts
-Flops turning the operation into something other than fractional (charter, lease, managed, new variation of operating not yet named that KR will again "invent")?
-Contract pilots flooding the operation
????
Just a few things to think about
NJW is free to say what she wants, I have no problem with it.
Especially because she keeps pissing you off.
I don't have a problem with it either.
She is perfectly free to write her selfish, greedy hypocritical, inexperienced and second hand knowledge coming from her union volunteer husband's rhetoric all she wants to. :laugh:
NJW has NEVER posted a selfish post.
It's all about being selfish. When the union is successful, she and her husband benefit because he gets paid by the union.
You forgot to address "greedy hypocritical, inexperienced and second hand knowledge coming from her union volunteer husband's rhetoric"
Most likely because you agree... it's true!!![]()
Hmm. When you put it like that, I DO agree - she has the right to be selfish there though, doesn't she? Her husband's Union has ensured his payroll, life style, work rules and benefits. She enjoys her company fully-funded health care plan, again, thanks to the Union. She sees her husband has the highest-paying salary in fractional aviation, which is WAY above ALL commuters and many of the low-cost majors. She sees her husband 7 days at a time and at least 14 days a month or they are properly compensated if he works longer.
Her life style and their happiness, she owes to her husband's Union. The company he works for enjoys a symbiotic relationship with the Union that has done nothing but show growth, success, and profit since their contract was signed in 2005, and pilots and management together work hard to maximize the company's profits and ensures its future. Together.
So what's your selfish excuses? The selfishness YOU display toward flight options pilots and our management (which you say you have NOTHING to do with) does... what, exactly?
I'd like to see B19's "solution" to flight options' problem, and how the Union is not a part of that. I want to see how B19 thinks our pilot group would be better without the Union (because things were OH so good before the Union was voted in).
Come on, B19. Give me your best. Right now. Earn F&H's money they are paying you. Or, earn that salary if you really are BT like so many believe.
Show us all how the Union is bad and that you have another way for us. But bring your facts. My bet is, you will only polish and shine the horns that are on managements' head when you do so. Put your money where your mouth is.
Try again, B19. I know it's hard and pushes your reading comprehension skills, but RTFQ's. Stop BLAMING and start providing the solutions - or do you not have any? But remember, bring your facts, or you'll look even more like an idiot
It's simple. Flight Options is screwed because of the union effort.
Pilots that didn't have the nuts or credentials to fly elsewhere decided to bring a union into a company that was and has been teetering on the edge for quite some time like it was going to fix something.
All said and done, even if there is a CBA, the pilots will be paid a little more, the work rules will be a little different and the owners will have to pay more.
The cash bucket will have less after the CBA than before, airplanes are still gonna break and pilots will continue to whine because the support staff doesn't get it done because the company can only afford to hire minimal staff because all the money goes to the pilots.
Yep, Flight Options is screwed and y'all ain't smart enough or don't have the credentials to bail out while the gettin' is good.
Funny, some IT people back in Baboo's homeland came up with this back in 2000:
"What is 'Management by Trust'?" http://www.itpeopleindia.com/20011231/management3.shtml