Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SkyWest Vote

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
like Comair did? like AWAC?

the tallest tree in the forest is the first to get cut down.

it's all about competing effectively and for the long term.

9/11, bankruptcies, people's lack of faith in the economy have all contributed to downward pressure. Pressure that has been mitigated by unions. But it works the other way around as well. When times are good, many pilot groups raise the bar.

As we know, this industry is cyclical. The only thing we can do is raise the bar when we have the leverage to do so and mitigate the downward pressure when we don't have that pressure. Currently, you are unable to do either.
 
Currently, you are unable to do either.

wow, then our situation must really suck to be in. every ALPA regional must be ahead of us in pay, QOL, future prospects, etc. after all, there is nothing we can do about anything, and management obtusely works only towards the bottom line.

yeah, this is not a good place to be.


(yawn)
 
wow, then our situation must really suck to be in. every ALPA regional must be ahead of us in pay, QOL, future prospects, etc. after all, there is nothing we can do about anything, and management obtusely works only towards the bottom line.

yeah, this is not a good place to be.


(yawn)

My point is that with all your companies success, it should be better. You are unable to affect that.
 
Nevets, SkyWest Management is a give and take management. They give you something, you give them something. You're saying the employees should take, take, take. When you borrow 10 bucks from somebody and never pay them back, and then go to borrow another 10 bucks....what's the usual response? Employee payroll directly affects the company's profit margin. By giving a little, the group actually gains more. When SkyWest can offer what you consider small raises, but the profit margin increases, its a double win for both groups. Its a fine line. Its the reason you are a pilot, I'm a dispatcher, and they actually run the financials of the company. As long as every employee is doing the job they were hired to do, they will be justly compensated, and there will be no ceiling for how high SkyWest can go.
 
Nevets, SkyWest Management is a give and take management. They give you something, you give them something. You're saying the employees should take, take, take. When you borrow 10 bucks from somebody and never pay them back, and then go to borrow another 10 bucks....what's the usual response? Employee payroll directly affects the company's profit margin. By giving a little, the group actually gains more. When SkyWest can offer what you consider small raises, but the profit margin increases, its a double win for both groups. Its a fine line. Its the reason you are a pilot, I'm a dispatcher, and they actually run the financials of the company. As long as every employee is doing the job they were hired to do, they will be justly compensated, and there will be no ceiling for how high SkyWest can go.

I just about shat myself reading this. I must be brain numb from a defered prop sync. Now I really feel retarded that I haven't seen this all along ...
 
Nevets, SkyWest Management is a give and take management. They give you something, you give them something. You're saying the employees should take, take, take. When you borrow 10 bucks from somebody and never pay them back, and then go to borrow another 10 bucks....what's the usual response? Employee payroll directly affects the company's profit margin. By giving a little, the group actually gains more. When SkyWest can offer what you consider small raises, but the profit margin increases, its a double win for both groups. Its a fine line. Its the reason you are a pilot, I'm a dispatcher, and they actually run the financials of the company. As long as every employee is doing the job they were hired to do, they will be justly compensated, and there will be no ceiling for how high SkyWest can go.

Of course its a give and take relationship. But your management just takes. The pilots actually lose buying power every year they get a 1% COLA. What does management get paid? What are their raises every year? Do they get more than 1%? Skywest has $750 MILLION just sitting in a bank and making almost $150 MILLION a year! Yeah, the profit margin increases for the company without an adequate COLA! Skywest has THEE best ballance sheet probably of ANY US airline and they probably make more money year after year than any regional. Where is the give? They will "give" you the least amount possible. And there is nothing wrong with that. After all, that is part of their job. Without any leverage, employees have nothing to even the playing field.

The employees should not just "take take take." But they should be able to stop giving to management considering the financial success of the company. I'm not saying that employees should brake the bank. I'm just saying that Skywest should just share a little bit more with the employees.
 
Last edited:
Just some rational thinking, and totally hypothetical, but let's ASSUME....

There are 11,000 employees. If Uncle Jerry gave each one of his employees an AVERAGE of $2,000 extra annually (which really isn't much of a raise, right?), that would cost the company $22,000,000 extra. $22M is 14% of the annual $150M currently coming in. These numbers DO add up.
 
Just some rational thinking, and totally hypothetical, but let's ASSUME....

There are 11,000 employees. If Uncle Jerry gave each one of his employees an AVERAGE of $2,000 extra annually (which really isn't much of a raise, right?), that would cost the company $22,000,000 extra. $22M is 14% of the annual $150M currently coming in. These numbers DO add up.

Why don't you take a paycut so the company can make even more money? How is that any different?
 
Just some rational thinking, and totally hypothetical, but let's ASSUME....

There are 11,000 employees. If Uncle Jerry gave each one of his employees an AVERAGE of $2,000 extra annually (which really isn't much of a raise, right?), that would cost the company $22,000,000 extra. $22M is 14% of the annual $150M currently coming in. These numbers DO add up.



"The cost per ASM of salaries, wages and employee benefits decreased to 3.3¢ for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to 3.4¢ for the year ended December 31, 2005. The average number of full-time equivalent employees increased 8.6% to 14,450 for the year ended December 31, 2006 from 13,304 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in number of employees was primarily due to the addition
37


of personnel required for the new regional jet flying and due to the addition of personnel required for new cities added to our ground handling service contracts."
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/793733/000110465907015112/a07-5838_110k.htm


Like I said, in essence, you are taking a pay cut. Anyways, I was speaking mainly about pilots. There are only 3,000 of them.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top