Rick James
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Posts
- 343
While I can't argue the facts, nor would I, the powers that be wanted a wider cabin at all costs. The talk of a 605 to replace our 604 is ongoing just because of the "wider" cabin (I realize how small it really is). I hope that Gulfstream will produce an aircraft to fill our next order, though I doubt it will be in time.Interesting...
The G550 cabin is 44'11"L x 6'2"H x 7'4"W with an interior cabin volume of 1,669 cu.ft and a baggage area of 226 cu. ft.
The CL604/605 cabin is 25'6"L x 6'1"H x 8'2"W with an interior cabin volume of 1,035 cu. ft. and a baggage area of 115 cu.ft.
So...while you do have a cabin width that is 10" wider than the Gulfstream, you do loose quite a bit in cabin length, height and volume.
Anecdotally, I notice after a flight in the Gulfstream that the FA is normally pushing the seats back against the cabin sides because the passengers have slid them into the aisles and canted them towards each other to facilitate conversation. The decision to widen the Gulfstream cabin was for marketing - not functionality.
GV
P.S. GV, I always value your input and look forward to your informative posts.