Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Older brains become less coordinated: U.S. study

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Secret Squirrel

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Posts
1,257
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Forgot where you put your keys? Or your car? (OR HOW TO DO A V1 Cut?

if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['Zb_4m0LEYuM-']='&U=13bivil5c%2fN%3dZb_4m0LEYuM-%2fC%3d625546.11685676.12249147.1414694%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d5036625';
b

If you are over 60, it may just be a normal part of aging, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday in a study that suggests brain structures deteriorate with age in otherwise healthy people.
The study, published in the journal Neuron, is part of an effort by researchers at Harvard University to understand the difference between normal, age-related declines and clinical impairment.
"We're trying to understand the edge of that boundary between normal aging and Alzheimer's disease," said Randy Buckner, a Harvard professor and Howard Hughes Medical Institute researcher who worked on the study.
Buckner and colleagues took brain scans of 55 adults ages 60 and over, and 38 younger adults ages 35 and younger. They used an imaging technique called PET to detect the presence of amyloid, a chemical typically associated with Alzheimer's disease, to rule out those whose memory declines were disease-related.
What they found is that some brain systems become less coordinated with age. "It looks like it is an effect of normal aging independent of Alzheimer's disease," Buckner said in a telephone interview.
They found brain structures called white matter tracks, which carry information between different regions of the brain, were deteriorating only in the older group.
"In young adults, the front of the brain was pretty well in sync with the back of the brain," Jessica Andrews-Hanna, a graduate student in Buckner's lab, said in a statement. "In older adults this was not the case. The regions became out of sync and they were less correlated with each other."
Buckner said the study suggests the cognitive decline in aging may be linked to communication problems between regions of the brain.
"We are talking about an effect that is progressing in the late decades of our lives," he said.
Not everyone was impaired to the same degree. This may help explain why some people who develop Alzheimer's disease succumb quickly and others decline more slowly.
"Some brains may be better prepared for the assault of Alzheimer's disease," Buckner said, adding that changes related to normal aging are mild compared with those associated with the progressive, degenerative disease that robs people of memory, reasoning and the ability to communicate.
"While it may mean our 80-year-old selves are not like when we were 20, it doesn't mean we are not doing extremely well compared to (the) disease," Buckner said.
 
If you are over 60, it may just be a normal part of aging, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday in a study that suggests brain structures deteriorate with age in otherwise healthy people.

But I thought the rabid age-65 d0uches said that there was no scientific basis for an age limit? :rolleyes:
 
Just remember, these are the baby boomers approaching 60 now-- their brains were fried on drugs maaaannn!!!!
 
The British version of Mens Health magazine would put that in the "ministry of the bleedin obvious" section.
 
Then we should make doctors and truck drivers...just make that drivers..and....etc retire at 60!
 
But I thought the rabid age-65 d0uches said that there was no scientific basis for an age limit? :rolleyes:
Hmmm. That would explain the hundreds of fractional and corporate jets piloted by 65 year olds falling out of the sky every year. :p
 
Lets test to see if age is a factor

But I thought the rabid age-65 d0uches said that there was no scientific basis for an age limit? :rolleyes:
We should igore age all together, and come up with a test that determines if you are capable of doing your job reguardless of age. This program would be administered by the FAA or its designated representatives. The test woud consist of flying an airplane or simulator while being observed. If all the manuvers were completed in accordance with guidlines published in a book then the pilot could continue to fly as a pilot. Some would be removed from the cockpit at age 46 and others at age 82
 
Last edited:
That test is already in place. It's called a check ride and it's done about every six months... Oh that's probably what you meant.
 
You got it, we already do that

That test is already in place. It's called a check ride and it's done about every six months... Oh that's probably what you meant.
Let some kind of test be given and make age a non-issue. I know many pilots past age 60 that are in better shape, have better mental capacity and have better skills than many pilots I have met that have not yet reached age 60.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, because those checkrides are so thorough and will give real insight into someone's cognitive abilities. :rolleyes:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom