Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA union looses Continental flying?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Erlanger

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Posts
1,693
Skywest SAPA President came out with an email today saying vote no to a union because it hinders an airline from getting additional flying. He says that ASA was suppose to get 35 plus airplanes to fly for Continental but the contract talks and threat of a strike caused them to go elsewhere. Seems like more scare tactics.
 
Skywest SAPA President came out with an email today saying vote no to a union because it hinders an airline from getting additional flying. He says that ASA was suppose to get 35 plus airplanes to fly for Continental but the contract talks and threat of a strike caused them to go elsewhere. Seems like more scare tactics.





What ya mean "seems like"??? This kinda bull$hit comes out every time we have a union drive!
 
Skywest SAPA President came out with an email today saying vote no to a union because it hinders an airline from getting additional flying. He says that ASA was suppose to get 35 plus airplanes to fly for Continental but the contract talks and threat of a strike caused them to go elsewhere. Seems like more scare tactics.


WHAT...Jerry wouldn't do THAAAT!:rolleyes: Man I hope that you guys see this coming! WATCH OUT!!! And oh by the way....they could have settled this contract over more than a year ago, but they were dragging their feet trying to "Beat Us" and show all the skywsters what will happen IF you vote in a Union. Jerry is a POS!! Nothing but a lying B@STARD!
 
Skywest SAPA President came out with an email today saying vote no to a union because it hinders an airline from getting additional flying. He says that ASA was suppose to get 35 plus airplanes to fly for Continental but the contract talks and threat of a strike caused them to go elsewhere. Seems like more scare tactics.

It is more scare tactics. ASA (read Skywest management) voluntarily withdrew their bid for that flying because they thought they would face staffing issues.

SAPA President saying "Vote no to ALPA" is about like a bum on the street saying, "Vote no to the anti-panhandling law". I think the SAPA guys are realizing that their cushy gig is about over and are grasping at any straw to try and save it.

SKW guys and gals.... you already have plenty of flying. Secure adequate representation first. Then, and only then, negotiate a contract that is not only fair to you but that allows SKW to competitively bid for new opportunities.

The SAPA guys have their own best interests at heart. Right now they are in a very comfortable position... cozy with management and negotiating for your "best interests" (How many weekends have your SAPA guys spent at JA's lake house? How many management "bonuses" have the been paid? How many times have they sold you down the river to make sure they stay in St. George's good graces???)

Honestly, I have no dog in this fight. ASA and SKW are never going to integrate, the way that I see it. We have a TA. It's most likely going to pass (my opinion). Airplanes will come our way when it does. ASA will be fine.

However, It absolutely kills me to watch you guys buy this BS time and time again. How many promises do they have to break? How many times do you have to "deal Brad an ace" just so he can go back on his word? How many pilots do they have to fire for truly acting as "PIC" (D.D.)? When is enough enough? I want you guys on board. Please do yourself an enormous favor and vote "yes". SAPA is wonderful for the anointed few who are in St. George's good graces. Who's looking out for the rest of you??????

Vote yes to ALPA for your own sakes, not for my sake. I'm out of this ASA/SKW/Delta mess in a month or so. Please, guys, do it for yourselves.
 
It is more scare tactics. ASA (read Skywest management) voluntarily withdrew their bid for that flying because they thought they would face staffing issues.

SAPA President saying "Vote no to ALPA" is about like a bum on the street saying, "Vote no to the anti-panhandling law". I think the SAPA guys are realizing that their cushy gig is about over and are grasping at any straw to try and save it.

SKW guys and gals.... you already have plenty of flying. Secure adequate representation first. Then, and only then, negotiate a contract that is not only fair to you but that allows SKW to competitively bid for new opportunities.

The SAPA guys have their own best interests at heart. Right now they are in a very comfortable position... cozy with management and negotiating for your "best interests" (How many weekends have your SAPA guys spent at JA's lake house? How many management "bonuses" have the been paid? How many times have they sold you down the river to make sure they stay in St. George's good graces???)

Honestly, I have no dog in this fight. ASA and SKW are never going to integrate, the way that I see it. We have a TA. It's most likely going to pass (my opinion). Airplanes will come our way when it does. ASA will be fine.

However, It absolutely kills me to watch you guys buy this BS time and time again. How many promises do they have to break? How many times do you have to "deal Brad an ace" just so he can go back on his word? How many pilots do they have to fire for truly acting as "PIC" (D.D.)? When is enough enough? I want you guys on board. Please do yourself an enormous favor and vote "yes". SAPA is wonderful for the anointed few who are in St. George's good graces. Who's looking out for the rest of you??????

Vote yes to ALPA for your own sakes, not for my sake. I'm out of this ASA/SKW/Delta mess in a month or so. Please, guys, do it for yourselves.


Great Post Fmrfreight. Where you headed? DAL, AT or JB? Good Luck!
 
I remember when the CHQ CEO announced to the entire company that the deal with United was lost due to contract talks and the threat of a strike.

This tactic can be found on page 1 of the FUD playbook. If your representative pilots are telling you this it speaks volumes as to where their loyalties lie.
 
Last edited:
Is this the flying that CHQ won?

If so, we're union .............

What's his point?
 
Is this the flying that CHQ won?

If so, we're union .............

What's his point?
His point was that ASA was in drawn out negotiations and nearing a strike, which scared off the new flying...

I like the part about how he said they wanted to give ASA new hires a raise to $23/hr so people would want to come work there. Great. And they gave the first year FO's at skyw a 23 CENT an hour raise when we can't staff our own airline. Glad they're looking out for us though... :rolleyes:

I'm still undecided in this deal, but the more emails and letters I get from management and SAPA, the closer I come to a yes vote.

There is NO REASON why we should have got the shaft on our "pay raise" last year, while ASA get's handed a raise to exceed skyw across the board, plus cola, etc,,, etc,,,
 
I was listening to a SkyWest, Inc. conference call where it was stated that they did not bid on the Continental flying due to the short 2 year duration. They thought the risks for taking on the flying outweighed the benefits. Nowhere in the call did they mention anything about ASA.

Funny how the story changes when they feel like they can use it to their advantage.
 
MarineGrunt said:
There is NO REASON why we should have got the shaft on our "pay raise" last year, while ASA get's handed a raise to exceed skyw across the board, plus cola, etc,,, etc,,,

Benefit of representation?
 
I was listening to a SkyWest, Inc. conference call where it was stated that they did not bid on the Continental flying due to the short 2 year duration. They thought the risks for taking on the flying outweighed the benefits. Nowhere in the call did they mention anything about ASA.

Funny how the story changes when they feel like they can use it to their advantage.

Do you remember which conference call that was? I'd love to point that out on the SAPA forums.
 
35 PLANES LOST BECAUSE OF CONTRACT TALKS!!!!

Here I am 28 years old with 37 years left in the industry and my career is ruined because of this round of contract talks. The horror!

I was suppsed to upgrade in ten minutes. Fly for exactly 1000 hours and then swiftly navigate my application to a super carrier. I was, of course, going to pick the carrier that will stay in buisness for the next 37 years. I would have also picked one that will not furlough in the next 5 years.

Instead it has taken me three years to become a regional captain! My life is ruined. Damn you ALPA and your signing bonus... you have ruined my life.
 
What ya mean "seems like"??? This kinda bull$hit comes out every time we have a union drive!

The President of SAPA realizes that if ALPA is voted in that he will lose his position. What are the perks of a SAPA President?
 
Last edited:
Skywest SAPA President came out with an email today saying vote no to a union because it hinders an airline from getting additional flying. He says that ASA was suppose to get 35 plus airplanes to fly for Continental but the contract talks and threat of a strike caused them to go elsewhere. Seems like more scare tactics.[/quot

Continental Express is unionized, and a strong union at that! Have they gained flying?

Either the President of SAPA is lying or Brad Rich misrepresented statements in the publicly broadcasted Quarterly Conference call for investors. Mr. Rich indicated that Skywest pulled their bid for the Continental flying because it was only a 2 year contract, and in the final hours, they did not want to commit resources for such a short duration that might limit Skywest bidding on any future flying. Mr. Rich also stated that they participated in that bid process, mainly for strategic reasons, to gather information on competitors and how they bid. He intimated that the purpose was to use the participation in the bid process as discovery for determining Skywest's competitor's cost and bidding practices. Mr. Rich indicated that this exercise provided him with valuable, strategic information on how Skywest would prepare bids for more desirable opportunities in the future. Mr. Rich also indicated that what he learned in that process was that Skywest had very competitive bids compared to their competitors. In the end, their purpose was not to win the bid! They pulled their bid because they probably feared they would win it. Why else would they?

Although this broadcast is not readily available, it is archived and could be found. However, plenty of ASA pilots, as well as Skywest pilots, interested in their Company's financial position, probably listened to this broadcast. Apparently, the SAPA President is not enlightened to his Company's direction, or he has selective memory!

Shouldn't the President of SAPA, who is leading his pilots, be more knowledgeable of his company's past, present, and future? Shouldn't he be situationally aware of his Company's business practices? Listening to the Conference Calls are FREE! Shouldn't the President of SAPA, be familar with at least the same information that a line pilot knows?

Some of us frontline workers listened to that conference call. Some of us listen to each one. I would hope that the leader of my pilot group would be as informed as his line pilots. Obviously, the President of SAPA didn't listen to Mr. Rich in that Conference Call, or chooses to use misinformation to protect his job as President of SAPA! I want my pilot leader to have integrity! Don't you??????????

The statement in the President of SAPA's letter appears to be a lie! It conflicts directly with the statements of Mr. Rich in a public forum to investors in a Conference Call, over a year ago. You have to make a decision on this one! Who is telling the truth?????
 
Last edited:
I can say without a doubt that I heard the conference call and it was stated exactly as referenced above.

They didnt like the short duration.

You guys need to call this guy out and ask which is true. Is Ron R. lying to the investors or is ASA the cause?

Its amazing how they talk out of both sides of their mouth.

Medeco
 
I also listened to the conference call along with every call since 2002. I agree that what the current sapa president sent out in an email is dishonest or very un-informed which in a sense would still be dishonest because he would be pushing agenda without checking the facts.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top