Unless, of course, one of the "sides" is an evil Union that is responsible for all that is wrong with the airline industry. Then you just turn any discussion, regardless of subject, into a platform for your already well documented opinions of that Union.
I never said that ALPA was "evil", nor have I said that ALPA is responsible for all that is wrong with the airline industry. Not that you probably care what I really said, but here it goes again...
1. ALPA isn't "evil", rather it is ineffective at combating managements portfolio whipsaw tactics. If any of you are really interested in stopping the "race to the bottom", then you will need to reform ALPA.
2. ALPA isn't "responsible for all that is wrong with the airline industry". The 5 main causes of our current predicament are:
a. The Deregulation Act of 1978 signed by Jimmy Carter.
b. The rapidly increasing cost of health care and retirement due to increasing longevity and health advances.
c. The attacks of 911.
d. Bankruptcy laws that allowed weak carriers to bring healthy carriers down.
e. Competition for flying within a brand (ie portfolio concept)
ALPA isn't "responsible" for the first 4 events, however it has reacted poorly to these changes. ALPA is partially responsible for the 5th. and has in fact made it worse with creations such as MidAtlantic, Compass, etc.
The important thing is to listen to both sides, and make informed decisions based on the facts that are presented. Blindly following either side off a cliff based on pure emotion is foolish....