Logging CRJ equip type

[Lazy8]

What's the proper way to log different CRJ time. CL65, CL-600-2B19, CL-600-2C10, etc..?

 

[bizzum]

What's the proper way to log different CRJ time. CL65, CL-600-2B19, CL-600-2C10, etc..?

CL-65

 

[viper548]

I don't know what's proper but I put CRJ-200, CRJ-700, or CRJ-900

 

[flyf15]

Your logbook is your logbook. There aren't rules about what you write in it. As long as what you write is truthful, correct, and you can explain your reasoning, you can log whatever you want. CL-65, CRJ, CRJ-900, CRJ-200LR, CL-600-123456, Bombardier Canadair Regional Jet 200, etc. They're all fine. Just be consistent.

 

[Lazy8]

So Northwest Mini-me wouldn't work?

 

[TOOL CRIB]

I just put in BJ for Barbie Jet

 

[siucavflight]

I do PJ for the pencil jet.

 

[djsk]

CRJ2 - Short and its what gets filed with ATC

 

[PeanuckleCRJ]

Canadian Space Shuttle


(I always used CL-65)

 

[Stifler's Mom]

I've never been questioned about "POS".

 

[CRJ puppy]

CRJ2 - Short and its what gets filed with ATC

Actually it's "CR2" that gets filed...

 

[wmuflyguy]

I don't know what's proper but I put CRJ-200, CRJ-700, or CRJ-900

Does anyone think it matters to a potential employer which kind of CRJ one has flown?
I guess if your applying to another regional possibly, but what about majors, fracs, or other places?

 

[PeanuckleCRJ]

When I was working on getting hired at various companies, most applications I filled out differentiated between the 200 and the 700 in the flight time break downs.




By the way.. the CRJ-200 is filed as "CRJ2" for ATC. ATC aircraft types are always 4 letters or digits.... e.g. B763, PA28, etc.

 

[DenverCrashpad]

CRJ2 - Short and its what gets filed with ATC

Also the correct way to log it.

 

[bizzum]

It says "CL-65" on the back of my certificate. If thats what the FAA calls it, thats what my logbook calls it.

 

[John Pennekamp]

I use CL-65-200 or CL-65-700.

 

[flyboyike]

I've never been questioned about "POS".

I've been using "Montreal Bomber".

 

[CoATP]

I've found that "50PERSONPEOPLEPACKER" fits nicely in my logbook.

 

[siucavflight]

I've found that "50PERSONPEOPLEPACKER" fits nicely in my logbook.

They could confuse that with an EMB 145 though.

 

[OPECJet]

"Winduptoy"