You forgot the Virgin America pilots. Likewise, they will also "set the standard." Tool.Can't wait to see the Virgin America FAs and IFE - they will set the standard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You forgot the Virgin America pilots. Likewise, they will also "set the standard." Tool.Can't wait to see the Virgin America FAs and IFE - they will set the standard.
http://www.forbes.com/2007/05/30/mc...ity-cx_cg_0530markets10.html?partner=yahootix
How much longer will these cool guys, be cool guys? All the boasting and rash comments on this forum. Every dog.....
It's called "market share." Southwest will fly a route (even if they lose money on it) just to secure market share. Once they attract and establish a customer base on that route with extremely low fares, they'll start raising the fares enough to make a profit. This strategy is talked about in the book, "Nuts." That article was one person's opinion. I'm sure Gary Kelly and Southwest management know what they're doing!
You forgot the Virgin America pilots. Likewise, they will also "set the standard." Tool.[/quote]
Why don't you re-read what I wrote Jacka$$. I specifically referred to VA's flight attendants and the in-flight entertainment vs. SWA's limited offerings. I mentioned nothing about the pilots - we are all aware of how low wages will negatively impact the profession. Check it out: http://www.virginamerica.com/difference/
You can't tell me SWA can compete with this product on overlapping routes if the prices are similar - especially on longer routes.
Jonjuan, you need to focus on what we are discussing - we are looking at the changing competitive environment - get it? Again, name calling and personal attacks are not great substitutes for logical arguments. This is a discussion board and I'd love to hear some counterpoints or people who don't believe SWA can be impacted by the rising LCC storm. Sometimes the truth hurts.
Six- You have to realize that SWA HAS BEEN competing with this product for some time now. I will agree that this is an ever-changing and much more competitive landscape. And I also agree that SWA needs to be able and willing to adapt. But for you to say that "NOBODY LIKES" that cattle call boarding process, or the FA's jokes, or the SWA product in general is a bit excessive. Ticket prices are all pretty much the same these days, and in many markets, SWA is not the cheapest way to get there. Yet SWA carries more pax than anyone, and with consistently industry leading customer satisfaction. Hard to argue that "NOBODY LIKES IT".
Give me a break about the cattle-car boarding. Do you really like not knowing whether you will get a preferred seat or not? Really? You don't care. I bet 95% of current SWA passengers would prefer assigned seating. I actually know people who avoid SWA specifically because of that reason - if they can find a comparable fare they will select the other choice because of the anxiety created by the cattle-car boarding. Sounds funny but that's the case. SWA's lack of entertainment options on their newer transcon 737-700 flights is also a negative with other carriers providing a lot more for comparable fares.
On Your Six,
As a former Netjets pilot, I will tell you that rich people will NOT "throw their money" at will. In fact, many of them are the cheapest a-holes out there. Rich people fly Netjets at any cost because the current perception is Netjets the safest and most reliable corporate airline. If that perception ever changes, Netjets will fail the next day. Nothing is written in stone, even Netjets, my friend. In fact, Netjets has some major flaws, such as most of their profits are from selling new shares - what happens when their growth flattens (and for more than just 18 months, like it did in '04)?
My favorite line from that article:
Instead of emulating the corrective steps taken by Delta Air Lines (nyse: DAL - news - people ) and AMR (nyse: AMR - news - people )'s American Airlines, Southwest's mangement simply implemented “modest cost-cutting” and other minor measures, he said.
Classic.
You forgot the Virgin America pilots. Likewise, they will also "set the standard." Tool.[/quote]
Why don't you re-read what I wrote Jacka$$. I specifically referred to VA's flight attendants and the in-flight entertainment vs. SWA's limited offerings. I mentioned nothing about the pilots - we are all aware of how low wages will negatively impact the profession. Check it out: http://www.virginamerica.com/difference/
You can't tell me SWA can compete with this product on overlapping routes if the prices are similar - especially on longer routes.
Jonjuan, you need to focus on what we are discussing - we are looking at the changing competitive environment - get it? Again, name calling and personal attacks are not great substitutes for logical arguments. This is a discussion board and I'd love to hear some counterpoints or people who don't believe SWA can be impacted by the rising LCC storm. Sometimes the truth hurts.
Of course swa can compete. This might be hard for you to understand, but swa mgmt are some smart people. The dont retreat much. (by the way, they tried a test change to the boarding process and the passengers HATED it and IFE is on the way). My previous post was against your "I can't wait to see VA" comments. BTW, are you referring to VA and skyloser as the "rising LCC strom"? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Of course swa can be effected by low ball piece of crap start ups. So will every other airline, which is the main point that we don't need them around or people like you pulling for them.
SWA did a VERY intensive study about assigned seating out of SAN. The pax overwhelmingly voted for NO assigned seating. So, I guess you are wrong in that respect. Most SWA pax actually prefer they way it is done now.
As far inflight entertainment, until they can get a 15% ROI it aint going to happen. People still are not willing to pay more for TV's and XM radio. SWA has studied it indepth and has the data. Until they can get 15% ROI for it, they aint buying it.
Please post evidence on this - I want to see the results (article) about this survey. It is counterintuitive. Perhaps that option was weighted against other options - I think it is called conjoint analysis. They never asked me or anyone else I know about boarding options. It is terrible - regardless of what Cletus of Hazzard County has to say on a survey. I am sure you love not having a preferred seat waiting for you. I suggest you ask SWA passengers (in the 2nd and 3rd boarding segments - seats 31 through 120) next time you are on your flight whether they would prefer an assigned seat. The first 30 pax probably are elated to be at the head of the line (reduces the anxiety inherent in any SWA flight boarding process). Why do you think pre-boarding software is so popular among SWA passengers now? Pax can use special software to ensure that they get a good seat ahead of time. If all SWA pax love the current system, why are these online services becoming so popular? Any answers to that question? Why do these new services exist?
If pax levels (and yields) at SWA start to dive on highly competitive routes with comparable fares, watch SWA reconsider investments in IFE. Offering service below industry standard (and that standard may soon include IFE with low fares) generally does not lead to increasing profits. Why be an outlier when IFE is so popular on other airlines?
Of course swa can compete. This might be hard for you to understand, but swa mgmt are some smart people. The dont retreat much. (by the way, they tried a test change to the boarding process and the passengers HATED it and IFE is on the way). My previous post was against your "I can't wait to see VA" comments. BTW, are you referring to VA and skyloser as the "rising LCC strom"? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Of course swa can be effected by low ball piece of crap start ups. So will every other airline, which is the main point that we don't need them around or people like you pulling for them.
Jet Blue was completely discounted when it started - nobody believed it could work. Now look at Jet Blue. It was very well funded and now Skybus has something like $170 million in funding. I am not suggesting that Skybus will eventually be as successful but you never know in this business - that's the point. I am not pulling for Skybus or VA - I am merely pointing out that they could adversely impact SWA's position in competing markets. Do you disagree with that?
Not every airline will be hit the same by the LCCs. Legacy carriers will continue to focus on international growth because there is less competition there and that is where the growth is (margins are much higher). CAL and DAL are focusing growth on international markets and will ultimately increase the number of E190/E170/CR9 aircraft in their fleets to directly compete against the LCCs. But the Legacies have great international feed and very strong marketing alliances with other airlines - these benefits are not shared by the LCCs. That's the point - the LCCs are fighting for the same, low-yield domestic passengers. They are increasing capacity quickly and this will force them to put airplanes wherever they can. People talk about Air Tran's motivation for acquiring Midwest is to find a place to put their incoming 737-700s... I don't know if that is true but that could be one motivating factor.
The LCCs will have to battle with each other for growth and margins (fares will decrease on competitive routes) and they won't have many high-margin growth opportunities like the Legacies (i.e., international). Instead, the legacies will deploy cheaper 90-100 seaters to maintain their feed on competitive routes while continuing to offer better loyalty/frequent flier programs to secure more lucrative business passengers.
SWA will continue to succeed, but it will be a far tougher environment going forward (not the same time period as the one discussed in NUTS) and profits will likely be strained unless SWA can adapt to capture more revenue or cut costs elsewhere. That's the original point...
DUDE, management did a test out of SAN and the PAX overwhelmingly stated that they didn't like assigned seating.
There was a lot information provided by SWA management to the employees at SWA. SWA management stated that all the data showed that the PAX of a SAN (a very high priced market for SWA) didn't like assigned seating.
If you want the data call SWA management and ask for it. I am only a worker bee and dont have that information. However, I do trust SWA and realize they know what they are talking about.
Sorry that your argument that people avoid SWA because of no assigned seating is BS. But your argument is incorrect. I tried to be polite and tell you the truth but I guess that is not good enough for you.
Can we still do polls on Flightinfo? I'd like to ask all of Flightinfo participants for their opinions on this. I'm betting most people prefer to select a seat early and know where that seat is before boarding.
On Your Six said:My argument is correct because it is logical.
On Your Six said:Why did they pick SAN for the study?
On Your Six said:Why not ISP or LAS?
On Your Six said:Did they ever ask pax who routinely get placed in the middle or last boarding groups for their preference? What do you think their preference would be?
On Your Six said:Why do these online boarding services (pay a fee to get a better seat selection) even exist if nobody cares about where they sit? Just answer that question for me...