Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nope. Not going to get one. I have absolutly no desire to work at Delta mainline..
Is this true? I haven´t had heard this from any of my friends that have been hired so far. I was thinking the only thing a previous employer could say was if they would rehire you or not....or something to that effect.With the sick policy at DAL. You sign a release for your former employer to release that info. It is a big deal... It is one of six criteria that they grade you on.
If there are any negative items in your file at ASA they will be released to whoever you interview with. In the case of sick calls, you don't have anything to worry about if everything is legitimate. Delta seems to be looking for guys who abuse the ability to call in sick. There are guys who have been hired on here who have had lots of sick calls, but they filed for FMLA when it occured or included doctor's notes when they came for the interview. Remember, ASA is right across the street from Delta, the facts will be checked. Good luck.
That's not entirely true.
The "occurance file" is kept in the chief pilot's secretary's office and is not part of your "personnel file" which is at the GO. This is the file that is sent, not the CP file. The PRIA stipulates that certain records, such as training, drug testing, and discipline record must be released. If too many occurances results in discipline (ie a suspension) then it's sent to the GO. Otherwise, ASA does not pass these records on.
Furthermore, just because ASA is "across the street", it doesn't relieve ASA's liability should you be turned down for a job because they provided information not required by the PRIA. Pilots have every right to sue is this occured, and would probably own ASA.
A possible way around it is if Delta requires applicants to sign a waiver compelling ASA to provide the records, which is occurring. This could be construed as a contract signed under duress. Someone who isn't hired and told it's due to a poor attendance record provided by ASA should challenge this in court.
So not one male w/o pic time has been hired/interviewed?... Anyone know of one?....
"As a white, educated male, you are now the most discriminated against demographic group in the country."Even if the above statement is true, it is irrelevant. I suspect it would be an extremely difficult discrimination case to win. Probably more importantly, if you really want to work for Delta, being the guy to openly question why your lack of estrogen placed you in a different category of applicants that happened to require significantly more experience and qualifications would not be a positive influence in the hiring process.
As a white, educated male, you are now the most discriminated against demographic group in the country.
That's not entirely true.
The "occurance file" is kept in the chief pilot's secretary's office and is not part of your "personnel file" which is at the GO. This is the file that is sent, not the CP file. The PRIA stipulates that certain records, such as training, drug testing, and discipline record must be released. If too many occurances results in discipline (ie a suspension) then it's sent to the GO. Otherwise, ASA does not pass these records on.
Furthermore, just because ASA is "across the street", it doesn't relieve ASA's liability should you be turned down for a job because they provided information not required by the PRIA. Pilots have every right to sue is this occured, and would probably own ASA.
A possible way around it is if Delta requires applicants to sign a waiver compelling ASA to provide the records, which is occurring. This could be construed as a contract signed under duress. Someone who isn't hired and told it's due to a poor attendance record provided by ASA should challenge this in court.
"As a white, educated male, you are now the most discriminated against demographic group in the country."
Good grief man....you sound just like those college kids on the RV in "Borat".
very thoughtful post. thank you.Haven't seen the movie. (In fact, haven't been able to do a whole lot of anything recreational lately. Not a lot of slack for a recreational budget as a first year FO. [Yup, I knew this going in.])
Do not misunderstand me: I'm not making excuses for my place in the aviation career or bemoaning this aforementioned incontrovertible fact. It simply is.
There are a lot of organizations and movements out there to 'right' some wrong of the past, perceived or not. It's my opinion that you can not retroactively correct an injustice without creating another one. Devils advocate time: If I'm someday responsible for making hiring decisions for an organization, how will the preferential treatment given over me to (women, minorities, possessors of non-standard sexual orientation, etc.) influence my hiring practices? [If I am indeed ever placed in that position, I personally would select applicants that are the best for the job, based solely on merit.]