CAL--This can't be real...

[AA717driver]

Got this off another website. Come on, CAL guys, this has to be a hoax:

--------------------------

*CAL** Safety Update*

February 23, 2007

On Feb. 9, 2007, the EWR Chief Pilot’s Office distributed the following
B-737 Update:

I woke up Wednesday morning and departed for work. I found my car under
an unexpected covering of loose powdery snow. I brushed it off the
windshield, and departed. As I accelerated up the street, the snow
readily blew off my car as I expected it would. When I arrived in EWR
that morning, it was apparent to me that we were in the midst of a
full-blown de-icing operation with our morning bank of planes, for
exactly the same conditions as I found with my car that morning: Loose
powdery snow covering the surfaces of the aircraft. Outside temperature
was well below freezing. Was de-icing warranted that morning? It’s my
opinion it was NOT. Flight Manual Sec 3, page 349 states, “The check to
determine the need for de-icing is an examination of critical aircraft
surfaces to ensure they are free of any ADHERING ice, snow, slush, or
frost. It was more than my opinion that morning that the loose powdery
snow would have departed almost immediately during the takeoff roll; I
actually did an inspection of an aircraft parked at the gate, to
determine actual conditions. Flight Ops Manual Sec 9, cites FAR 121.629,
which says the same about adhering contamination. Yet there was a
line-up of at least 25-30 aircraft waiting to be de-iced, and more to
follow. It was my opinion (and it appears that I am full of opinions
today) that this was a herd mentality. One aircraft asks to be de-iced,
and everyone else follows suit. In light of my continued message
regarding safety, this may seem contradictory. Believe me, I am in no
way suggesting that you compromise safety. Instead, I am suggesting that
we understand the conditions, and exercise common sense. This was an
opportunity to not only be safe, but to be efficient as well. Remember
that Professional statement I mentioned above. It was suggested by
someone that he would not take the chance that a lawyer may be seated in
row 13, as he was approaching the runway for takeoff with snow on his
wings. My answer to that is to make an announcement to the passengers
stating your intentions. Again, Safety and Common Sense prevails, but
knowledge is power.

-----------------------

And I thought all the Icahn-era TWA management pukes had retired... TC

 

[Indapool]

So the Clean Aircraft Concept is no longer mandatory

Alrighty then.

 

[Quimby]

Is this for real?

 

[Jonny Sacko]

Yes and no, I believe he recanted, and moved on. It was an opinion, ALPA was quick to oppose and stated such. Dropped.

The guy has to write something every week, I bet he's run out of things to say, and is just shooting from the hip at times. He's a good guy.

 

[Beechnut]

.....

 

[densoo]

Assistant Chief Pilot, not the Chief Pilot.

The full recant:

Good morning, and welcome to this week’s update. Two weeks ago, I issued an article concerning decisions to be made regarding the de-icing of your aircraft. I have been speaking on this website for several years now, and never have I received as much feedback as this article has generated. So I feel it’s only appropriate to respond to each of your concerns, and I’ll use this forum to do so. Some of you understood my intent, others appear confused. Let me first say, “Never did I intend to suggest that you violate FAR mandates, Flight Ops Manual and/or Flight Manual guidance, concerning the de-icing of your aircraft”. If you cannot assess whether or not contaminants are adhering to your aircraft, you must remove them prior to takeoff. My intent was solely to stimulate a thought process by you the Pilot for your own situation. I don’t expect you to be lined up for the de-ice pad only because everyone else is. I don’t want you to allow the media, a passenger, or Flight Attendant to influence how you fly your aircraft, and why you make decisions. You are all highly trained professionals; I expect that you use that training and expertise to make good decisions in the best interest of safety. That day, as I left my home, my thought process for what I would have encountered had I been flying, had already began. The observation I made concerning my vehicle, and the loose powdery snow blowing off as I began to accelerate, was the beginning of assessments I was making for my day. That analogy was not meant to insinuate that conditions concerning my vehicle would be the same as you would encounter with your aircraft. It was meant to say, that the wheels of thought were in motion. I was observing the environment and formulating thoughts for what I may encounter when I arrived at the aircraft. The snow had stopped; the temperatures were well below freezing. In an attempt to help you better assess the environment; I went to a parked aircraft to see if snow, ice or frost were adhering. I drove in the Snowflake vehicle to the ballpark, where I observed many of you waiting for de-ice, in what appeared to be perfectly clean planes from my perspective. I advised over the frequency of my assessment and observations; some took my lead, broke out of line and safely went flying; others remained steadfast in their conviction to de-ice. I was not out there directing, only providing information to help you make decisions. The bottom line to all this is simple. I want thinking Pilots flying our planes. I want you to be able to assess the conditions, and make decisions in the best interest of safety.

 

[luckytohaveajob]

Lincoln Alert!

A long time ago I worked at a small GA operation at a small airport. The owner of the operation drove a Lincoln. He would drive his old gangsters style Lincoln onto the taxiways of this uncontrolled field and with his hand held transceiver play air traffic controller and deck landing officer evaluator.

His intent was to get everyone on the ground a minute sooner so he could save a few bucks in costs. He would instruct us to land into the wind and others to break off and land on the crosswind runway. While all the time judging your landings and getting info for your next butt chewing because he would have done something slightly different.

So if someone came in and saw the Lincoln that pilot would call,"Lincoln Alert!," on another frequency. It gave us all a heads up on that the remote checkride was in progress and every decision we made was going to be second guessed. The owner/Chief Pilot was interfering with the flying pilots cockpits, directly and indirectly. It was not appreciated then and I don't think anyone appreciates it now.

 

[snow-back]

A long time ago I worked at a small GA operation at a small airport. The owner of the operation drove a Lincoln. He would drive his old gangsters style Lincoln onto the taxiways of this uncontrolled field and with his hand held transceiver play air traffic controller and deck landing officer evaluator.

His intent was to get everyone on the ground a minute sooner so he could save a few bucks in costs. He would instruct us to land into the wind and others to break off and land on the crosswind runway. While all the time judging your landings and getting info for your next butt chewing because he would have done something slightly different.

So if someone came in and saw the Lincoln that pilot would call,"Lincoln Alert!," on another frequency. It gave us all a heads up on that the remote checkride was in progress and every decision we made was going to be second guessed. The owner/Chief Pilot was interfering with the flying pilots cockpits, directly and indirectly. It was not appreciated then and I don't think anyone appreciates it now.

That's gotta be Earl. Did anyone else fly out of the OLD Boulder City airport? Yikes!

"G** D*** You suck! There should have been 6 body bags after that landing! You're flying the Skyhawk for the next week."

 

[tico]

Sounds like a reasonable thing for a chief to remind everyone of....Political de-icing which goes on all the time is a complete waste of time and money....As the guy said....adhering is the key word and if it is well below freezing and the wing is also well below freezing the stuff is not adhering than go.....

 

[Dizel8]

As the guy said....adhering is the key word and if it is well below freezing and the wing is also well below freezing the stuff is not adhering than go.....

True perhaps, but how about if the fuel uplifted was at a higher temperature, then it just might have heated the wing enough, that the snow above would have melted and refrozen, now adhering to the wing . Now what, and how would you detect it, if it was still cover by a light dusting of snow?

 

[densoo]

As the guy said....adhering is the key word and if it is well below freezing and the wing is also well below freezing the stuff is not adhering than go.....

"It was more than my opinion that morning that the loose powdery snow would have departed almost immediately during the takeoff roll;"

How can you know this until you start the takeoff roll. And then, if it doesn't blow off?

If it is on the wing isn't it, by definition, adhering?

 

[MD11Drvr]

Ya know, when I flew smaller aircraft a large push broom could save you from de-iceing. But now that I have the equivlant of a football field to sweep and a couple hundred folks it seems deiceing would be the way to go.

 

[PositiveRate]

If it's on the wing, it's adhering...it's a black or white issue, no gray area. It seems the 25-30 aircraft in line for de-icing had this basic concept down pat.

 

[AK737FO]

cold and dry

In Alaska's World you do not want to deice for a light powder. To do so would be foolish. Why add liquid to a bone dry cold soaked wing? It will be froze up rock solid before you get to the runway. If the powder on the wing comes off with a breath of wind, we are good to go on the Arctic. I think the Continential Chief got it right - but his troops have been so trained to go for the type II if they see a snowflake that he has to recant his statement. When ever I see a jet getting deiced for a dab of powder on a -30 wing, I just see $100 bills flying out the end of the hose, what a waste.

 

[crashpad]

What's wrong with using common sense and saving thousands of dollars for the company? It might be the 1 dollar which puts a company in the black and gives the pilot leverage to request a pay increase.

 

[Beechnut]

In Alaska's World you do not want to deice for a light powder. To do so would be foolish. Why add liquid to a bone dry cold soaked wing? It will be froze up rock solid before you get to the runway. If the powder on the wing comes off with a breath of wind, we are good to go on the Arctic. I think the Continential Chief got it right - but his troops have been so trained to go for the type II if they see a snowflake that he has to recant his statement. When ever I see a jet getting deiced for a dab of powder on a -30 wing, I just see $100 bills flying out the end of the hose, what a waste.

What's that got to do with that day in Newark?

S.

 

[720persecond]

If I worked for CAL I d send him an email asking him to come with a broom next time I have to deice. It's much cheaper than Type I

 

[Caveman]

As usual the truth is somewhere in the middle. The CP's point about a herd mentality is valid. How many times have we seen a/c that just made a quick turn head out to the de-ice line because everybody else was in line? They just landed, the airframe is clean but they went and got in line with all the lightly frosted originating a/c that have been cold-soaked for the last 8 hours.

OTOH there are too many eyeballs watching us day in and day out to not take an extremely conservative approach in everything we do. It's the same old story, if you don't deice and something minor happens that really has nothing to do with deicing the question will always be, "Why didn't you deice?". Look at the recent fiasco in JFK with JetBlue. Despite everybody trying to do the right thing and play by the rules some crews are being taken to task by the feds for departing when the ATIS was indicating ice pellets. The fact that at the time there weren't any ice pellets is irrelevant to the feds. The Captain's real time observation doesn't count. The ATIS said so, it must be so. You can't win no matter what you do.

Personally, if I have accumulated snow on the airframe, powder or not, I'm getting deiced. I don't know whether or not it will blow off on the takeoff roll. Besides, every definition I've ever read says I can't depart with frozen stuff adhering to the airplane. Depart in my book means to start down the runway. How is it possible to do that legally with snow on the a/c? As soon as we start to roll we are 'departing'. It has to be clean before I can depart. It doesn't say I can depart with snow as long as it clears up within 1 minute, or 30 seconds, or 15 minutes, or any other time. It has to be clean before I add T/O power. YMMV.

 

[C-150ETOPS]

What's that got to do with that day in Newark?

S.

Not much, even if it is 10 Degrees F. When you end taxiing for 45 minutes behind someone else, and the jetblast causes the "loose" flurries to melt and refreeze on your wing, you can guarantee the little "chiefy" will disappear from sight when a cellphone video of your upper wing surface shows up on the "O'Reilly Factor"

I thought the "chiefy's" clarification letter was dumber than the first. Don't take it as an insult CAL, every "chiefy" hired at my major has had their "bags" removed before their first day on duty.

 

[eaglefly]

How can you tell what's going to adhere and what's not ?

I suppose those 25-30 CAL planes should've taxied out and lined up for takeoff LOOKING like Air Florida. I'm sure the pax would have been going insane, not to mention any deadheading pilots.

Now who knows, MAYBE all of them would have lifted off nicely. Maybe one woudn't have. The idiot who wrote that Letter has now jeopardized CAL with regard to belief in the propriety of takeoffs with the "clean aircraft" concept. Should that little ditty make it home to some crew and they assume no adherance and are wrong, the lawyers for the next-of-kin of their victims will barbeque CAL for safety issues. I believe lawyers refer to that as "culpable negligence"

This Letter is now OUT THERE for use against CAL in the future.

That moron is not only an incompetant idiot for producing such rubbish, someones will be in the doghouse for publicly publishing it.

CAL's lawyers HAVE to be groaning right now.