I just reread this thread to see if there was any resolution to the Rolex versus Timex controversy raging here. It seems like Muddauber’s observation is exactly correct.
There are more Rolex supporters here than detractors.
Point men in the discussions were Rez O. Lewshun, A Squared, Swass and GVFlyer.
GVFlyer very eloquently stated his views.
Rez O. Lewshun repeatedly misstated them and is apparently very fond of A Squared.
A Squared seems to resent GVFlyer’s prosperity as much as he likes his cheap watches as evidenced by his repeated ad hominem attacks. It was humorous when he wrote, "First, spare us the tiresome bragging about the size of your home, bank account and other symbols of wealth." The items A Squared listed aren't symbols of wealth, they are wealth!
Swass, GEXDriver, NJAFracPilot, SeaSpray and V70T5 were very clear in their justifications of the Rolex watches they wear.
There are some very clear differences of perspective here. Rez O Lewshun and A Squared are convinced that Rolex and Omega watches are jewelry. GVFlyer is certain that they are tools, "I don’t know how you consider stainless steel professional watches such as the Omega SeaMaster GMT and Rolex GMT Master as such. They’re tools. One’s a dive watch, the other a pilot’s watch."
Amish Rakefight was the voice of calm reason saying that it was okay to not want what you can’t afford.
I had no idea that which watch one wears would be such an emotional issue. It’s like class warfare between the aviation haves and have-nots.
Oh, well. As Mercury said, "To each his own".
BTW, I wear a Rolex Oyster Perpetual Lady Datejust and my Daddy gave it to me too, Muddauber!
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
_SkyGirl_
Happy New Year!