Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Master's degree and hiring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter unreal
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 14

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
My opinion is that it can't hurt. If you're getting a Masters for the sheer purpose of preferential hiring, then I would say it's not worth pursuing. But if you have an oppourtunity to further your education and mind, then by all means do so, especially if it's paid for.

When it comes down to being hired, well it should theoretically have a small impact at best. Maybe the guy across from you has a similar educational background which might make the difference. If anything it will help characterize you as a person with knowledge and a broader understanding of things that make this world go around.
 
Wow, who knew avbug was so anti-education? I notice that with a lot of the older pilot types. I wonder why that is?

What might make you suppose I'm "older?" What might make you suppose I am anti-education. I am not. I said nothing of the sort. Equating a degree with education, or learning for that matter, is a false association.

Example: If I've got 1000 total and 200 multi along with a master's degree, and another applicant has 1000 total and 200 multi with just a Bachelor's degree, will the Master's make a difference in hiring decision?

That was good or a chuckle. Neither applicant is more than barely qualified to open the aircraft door, let alone be competitive in any way. In other words, the piloting qualifications as totals go, is unimpressive. Adding an entirely irrelevant piloting qualification does not make the pilot more impressive. An inexperienced pilot is still an inexperienced pilot. See the former examples. You're not being hired, especially at that early stage in the game, for your outstanding diction, pedigogal anthologies, brightspark philosophies, papers and theses, or your degree.

"Wow, sir. You have no flying experience and no great qualifications but the bare minimum...but you have a masters degree. That does it, you're hired, and here's double the salary while you're at it." What's the difference between a fast food worker who has a high school diploma and one who has a masters degree? The one with the high school diploma is probably managng the one with the master's degree because he or she has been in the work force longer. Equate what you like with fast food...but the fast food worker is probably earning more than the 1,000 hour pilot with 200 hours of multi engine time. Degree, or not.

I never told you not to get a degree. I am not "anti-education." However, flying an airplane is not rocket science, and most employers know this. Most employers are intelligent enough that they hire on the basis of qualification, experience, ability, and suitability for the assignment...not necessarily for the letters next to the applicant's name.

I did have a prospective employer years ago, as I sat in my uneducated ignorant state across the interview desk, tell me that my lack of a degree then would prevent me from having meaningful conversations with his clients...many of whom were "professionals." Such shortsightedness was indeed idiotic, and while you will find the rare individual like this in the work place...you won't find so many. Ironically, that individual had obtained his flight experience without a degree, having obtained one later in life, and quickly turned to look down his nose at the masses.

Of course it has nothing to do with improving one's flying skills. that goes without saying. Why does everyone equate this with flying.

Oooh, this one's a toughie. Perhaps because the thread regards a poster who asked if holding a master's degree will aid him in obtaining favor in seeking employment as a pilot, when the primary consideration in hiring a pilot isn't his sheepskin, but his ability to fly the airplane. D'ja think?

I'm more concerned with the hiring decisions going on, not stick-and-rudder capability.

Therein lies the rub...you shoudl be more concerned with the flying, and leave the hiring decisions to those who do the hiring. There's far more to flying than stick and rudder capability.

(maybe it has something to do with living in the "Big Apple").

Please, no apologies are necessary. I won't hold that against you, necessarily.

I guess college graduates are a bunch of lazy guys without productivity on their mind.

No, not necessarily. Not if you consider beer and sex productivity. Also not necessarily accolades that cry out a candidate as the better pilot. What's the most common phrase heard from a college graduate today?

"Would you like fries with that, sir?"

A degree provides so much more in making a person more complete.

"Very impressive, sir. Eight thousand hours of some of the most demanding flying known to man. Three saves, and would you look at that? The congressional medal of honor! Your hair is so perfect, and your teeth so white, and I see here that you self-sponsored through the National Test Pilot School. And built your own triplane. And biplane. And taugh homeless kids to fly in your spare time and on your own dime, after becoming self-made by inventing the musical panty-liner. Every certificate and rating known to man and...now THAT is something. They even invented a rating just for you. You're definitely for us...no, wait a minute. You don't have a master's degree. Good lord, man! You come here to us and waste our time, an incomplete applicant! You go get yourself an education before returning back here. What do you think we are? We are educated people sir, and I will not have you dragging down my complete associates, clients, and employees with your incomplete selflessness! To think that you might have contaminated us with your filthy lack of completion! Look at yourself, man! You're missing an arm! How can you be master of your own domain without that arm? Go complete yourself, and don't show your face around here again, without a master's degree and a complete self! Then, when you've made something of yourself, we'll deign to consider you for a position in our Cessna 310. Be gone!"

So close, yet so far away.

It has more to do with being more of a human than a better pilot.

Aah agm naht än aanimawl! Aah agm ahn heuwmahn beeeing! Seee? Aaah hahve ah mahsturs degrie!

You're quite right, of course. Those lacking a master's degree are lesser humans than those having a masters degree. What an utterly ignorant and stupid thing to say...which proves that holding the degree has nothing to do with education, intelligence, or even wisdom...some of the traits that do go to enhancement of one's character. You really believe you're somehow more of a human because you have a degree? And you believe yourself to be learned???

Pardon me while I pop another antacid tablet and choke down some water while I laugh.

This my friend, is caused more by nurture and their life-long oversocialization by society, which is also quite varied from person to person.

Just curious how you would have constructed that sentence structure if you didn't have that fancy college education.

I'm sure you start your day off with a box of Wheaties - The Breakfast of Champions, such as yourself.

Did your professors not impress upon you the impropriety of speculation in your quest to be a better human than the next guy? I don't eat breakfast, or wheaties. I've never actually been a champion, but some of the people on the box tops scare me. If only better humans have master's derees then why aren't masters graduates the prime candidates for the wheaties boxes? Hmmm?

While it's true any moron can attain a degree with minimal effort,

Settled, and done!

I WILL make the mistake of equating education to learning, simply because education is very close a synonym for learning.

You equate wrongly. Learning, by definition is measured by a change in behavior. Education does not imply, nor assure, a change in behavior. Further, the definition itself is wrong, as one may most certainly learn without changing one's behavior..thus making the act of learning unquantifiable, and therefore unrecognizable, and therefore negating the practice of awarding learning by the issuance of a degree for that which one cannot necessarily divine.

Some of histories brightest individuals lacked a degree. Of course, the tinman was nothing until he had his degree. Look how it turned out for him! Perhaps your're onto something after all.

Your intelligence or I.Q. is set at birth and can only get lower throughout life (if you let it).

Rubbish.

An education cannot be taken away from you.

Wrong again. Through misuse or neglect any training, insight, learning, adapive behavior, ingrained habits or patterns of design may be altered, dimmed, or lost...an education most certainly can be taken away by any number of methods...though neglect is perhaps chief among them.

See a pilot without recurrent come back two years later and try to perform at anywhere near the same level...education fades, rusts, perishes. It can be taken away, it can be lost, and a person can be broken. I've seen it happen.

None of us is ever more than a step away from the gutter, and there, most anything is possible...including re-education.
 
unreal how about this comparison, candidate A is 24 yrs old 4000 hr total time, 3000 MEL, type rating in two jets and 1000 TJ PIC, he just finished his on line ERAU degree. Candidate B has a 1000-hour and 200 MEL, but he has a Master's. Who will get hired? Flight time and experience makes difference.
 
Getting answers in this place is a lot like wrestling with a pig. You get dirty, and the pig likes it.
unreal how about this comparison, candidate A is 24 yrs old 4000 hr total time, 3000 MEL, type rating in two jets and 1000 TJ PIC, he just finished his on line ERAU degree. Candidate B has a 1000-hour and 200 MEL, but he has a Master's. Who will get hired? Flight time and experience makes difference.

That's a given. If I'm up against a person with 4000/300 and 1000 TJ PIC, I wouldn't expect to even be in the running. My example from before intentionally set both candidates with the exact same flight qualifications. I'm asking whether a Master's is going to break a tie, not set me ahead of someone with vastly greater experience. Also, whether 1000/200 is enough to get hired in the first place is beside the point. Let me further clarify my question:

If candidate "A" and candidate "B" have the exact same flight hours and experience level, but candidate "A" has a Master's degree while candidate "B" has a Bachelor's degree, would said operation more likely hire "A" over "B"?

That is the only question I'd like answered. All of this talk about differing experience levels, etc. is unnecessary. It goes without saying that a lot of airlines do care about one's level of education (i.e. preferring a 4-year degree), so it would seem to me that they wouldn't prefer one if they didn't at least care a little bit about your life outside of being a pilot.
 
Back to basics, if you feel you need a Master's degree to make a statement, expand your mind, or whatever other reason; by all means go get a masters degree. But if your sole purpose is to make a bigger impression on the SWA, FedEx, UPS, etc. interview board, then spend your time getting the flight time that makes you stand apart from the competition. The same apply to a BS/BA degree, you are hurting your airline career opportunities by going to school full time unless you are going the USN/USAF route. Build flight time, go to school on the side and you may find yourselves like one of our pilots 25 years old DC-9 Captain 4000 hours 3000 MEL, 500 TJ PIC, and two jet type ratings. Plus an on-line degree to be finished next year with no debt. How many college kids who went to school full time will match those credentials at age 25?
 
"The man who graduated yesterday, and stops learning today, is uneducated tomorrow."

There is no better investment than education.
 
Getting answers in this place is a lot like wrestling with a pig. You get dirty, and the pig likes it.

This place has truly become useless for information....

As for your question, my opinion is that the Master's wouldn't have any effect at all on your competitiveness for a pilot job. A Bachelor's, yes, but not a Master's. However, my only regret in my education is that I went for an aviation degree. If I had it to do all over, I'd still be flying, but I would have gotten a degree in another field entirely, in case aviation came to a crashing halt (Which it sort of did), or I lost my medical or something like that. So if you have the means to do it, it might be worth an MBA just to give you an "out" if you need it.

Hope that helps.
 
This place has truly become useless for information....

As for your question, my opinion is that the Master's wouldn't have any effect at all on your competitiveness for a pilot job. A Bachelor's, yes, but not a Master's. However, my only regret in my education is that I went for an aviation degree. If I had it to do all over, I'd still be flying, but I would have gotten a degree in another field entirely, in case aviation came to a crashing halt (Which it sort of did), or I lost my medical or something like that. So if you have the means to do it, it might be worth an MBA just to give you an "out" if you need it.

Hope that helps.

Yeah, that would be me. BS Aero Sci from ERAU. Realized about halfway through that it was stupid, but at that point I was pot-committed and just finished. Hence the reason I'm doing a Master's in Management with a non-aviation concentration: It's a good solid backup plan.
 
You have to decide on what you want to be a college graduate or a pilot. If is a pilot, you fly airplanes and build resume stuff. It will take approximately 10 years to get to a career position in aviation. You have to commit to the time frame to make it. If you elect after 5 years to get out of flying to pursue your major in college, you will be five years behind that year's college grads. To not fly and get a degree may be fun but it does nothing for your flying career. Now to get a degree on the sides while you are flying, nothing wrong with that. However, the fallback value of a degree is greatly over rated. I have BS and a Master's in Management, but at age 53, I was making $250/wk loading cargo. After Zantop pretended to go out of went out of business in 1997, I had been a temporary High School Chemistry Teacher up until two weeks before the cargo job came along. However, they do not teach school in the summer so I had to take the cargo job. The value of an unused degree is highly over rated. 53 year old unemployed airline pilots are not eagerly greeted in any industry that I know of, even of having a couple degrees. Of course, I did not apply for many of the "College degree preferred jobs" such as apt manager, telephone direct sales, and plumbing floor manager at Home Depot, etc. If you get a college degree you have to use, the knowledge gained in college to develop a career or the degree is useless. After getting a degree, flying an airplane is not a knowledge expanding experience; it is skill development experience. Anyone care to chime in and share their experiences on entering the non-aviation job market after being out of college 20-30 years? However I will admitt my business degree has helped me a great deal in managing my household and investments.
 
I agree with pilotyip. I have a Master's degree in engineering and, while I don't regret it, I don't think it's helping me in my flying career. And if I had to "fall back" on engineering I doubt I would be able to get anything other than a very entry level job in my field. Really my fall back option would be to go back to school for the PhD.

But I do believe in the value of education. Being smart and educated might get you the job, because you'll be better prepared to study for the interviews and present yourself as a clear thinking, well rounded, intelligent person. But I don't think the slip of paper itself makes much difference.
 
You have to decide on what you want to be a college graduate or a pilot. If is a pilot, you fly airplanes and build resume stuff.

Actually I intend to do both. :)

The Master's is completely online, so it'll be done on the side of my flying. The beauty of it is that at the rate that I'm accruing hours at my current job, I'll have a solid amount of hours by the time I'm done with the Master's and will be able to move on from CFI'ing.
 
Sounds like a darn good plan there, unreal. Like I said earlier, the Master's degree may not get you any higher on the hiring list for a pilot job, but it'll never hurt you one bit to go for it.

What online program are you doing? ERAU? Phoenix?
 
ERAU. Might as well do it if it's on the company's dime, y'know? :D

I agree completely, a degree is so much more fulfilling when someone else pays for it. Good luck to you. :beer:




Now if I could just find someone to pay for me to get a doctorate.......
 
Here is a good example

Delta Pilot Basic Qualifications

To qualify for employment as a pilot at Delta you must have all of the following.


General Requirements
  • At least 21 years of age
  • Graduate of a four-year degree program from a college or university accredited by a recognized accrediting organization. Postgraduate education will be given favorable consideration
  • Current passport or other travel documents enabling the bearer to freely exit and re-enter the U.S. (multiple reentry status) and be legally eligible to work in the U.S. (possess proper working documents)
FAA Requirements
  • FAA commercial fixed-wing pilot license with an instrument rating
  • Current FAA First Class Medical Certificate
  • Passing score on FAA ATP written exam at time of interview
Flight Time Requirements
  • Minimum of 1,200 hours of total documented flight time
  • Minimum of 1,000 hours of fixed wing turboprop or turbofan time
When evaluating the flight time of applicants meeting the basic qualifications, consideration will be given to, among other things, quality, quantity, recency, and verifiability of training; complexity of aircraft flown; types of flight operations; hours flown as PIC; and recency and extent of flying experience. Applicants invited to interview must provide appropriate documentation of all flight hours.

http://www.delta.com/about_delta/career_opportunities/pilot_qualifications/index.jsp
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom