Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Aloha Airlines Sues Mesa Air Group

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

dhc8drvr

DC1030F FO
Joined
Mar 18, 2003
Posts
58
Aloha Airlines Sues Mesa Air Group for Misuse of Confidential Information
Friday October 13, 5:13 pm ET

HONOLULU, Oct. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- In a suit filed today by Aloha Airlines, Inc., and Aloha Airgroup, Inc., in state Circuit Court, Aloha said Mesa Air Group, Inc., received confidential information as a potential investor in Aloha and used it improperly to enter Hawaii's inter-island market with intent to drive Aloha out of business.
Aloha alleges in its suit that Mesa used Aloha's proprietary information to unethically compete in the Hawaii market by offering air fares that failed to cover Mesa's costs. Mesa's Chief Executive Officer Jonathan Ornstein has stated more than once that Mesa's Go! can "fly empty" for five years with the profits from Mesa's Mainland operations. This indicates that Mesa is not covering its costs and is ultimately motivated to offer unrealistic fares with intent to drive out competition from the Hawaii market.
Aloha's filing also points out that according to other legal documents, Mesa's Chief Financial Officer George Murnane III sent an e-mail message, stating that Mesa's entry would make "no sense" if Aloha remained in the inter-island market: "We definitely don't want to wait for them to die; rather we should be the ones to give them the last push."
As a result of the substantial and continuing economic harm brought on by Mesa's actions, Aloha is seeking damages and injunctive relief to stop Mesa from competing unfairly, and threatening the jobs of 3,500 Aloha Airlines employees in Hawaii.
"Mesa came to Hawaii under false pretenses, making false promises," said David A. Banmiller, Aloha's president and chief executive officer. "Aloha is not opposed to competition, we're opposed to unfair competition, and a competitor whose objective appears to be the demise of Aloha Airlines, ultimately to the detriment of Hawaii's consumers."
The Aloha suit stated that Mesa signed two confidentiality agreements in 2005 and January 2006 stipulating that Mesa would only use the confidential information for the purpose of pursuing an investment. If there was no investment, the agreements called for Mesa to promptly destroy Aloha's confidential information, including financial records, business plans, internal forecasts, customer lists, and other highly sensitive data regarding projections for the inter-island market.
The filing alleges that Mesa improperly used the information to compete directly against Aloha, with the ultimate goal of driving Aloha out of business.
An aviation services company registered in Nevada and based in Arizona, Mesa began inter-island service with its Go! subsidiary on June 9, 2006.
In its filing, Aloha noted that Mesa's Ornstein admitted to shareholders that Mesa's decision to begin inter-island passenger service in 2006 was based on confidential information obtained from Aloha and Hawaiian Airlines during their bankruptcies.
Ornstein was quoted as telling shareholders: " ... we do have the benefit of looking at both Aloha and Hawaiian when they were in bankruptcy ... "
Founded in 1946, Aloha Airlines is a Hawaii-based transportation services company that provides inter-island passenger and cargo services, transpacific service linking Hawaii with California and Nevada, and contract aviation services throughout Hawaii.
Contact: Stu Glauberman
Phone: (808) 539-5947; (808) 722-7318
E-mail: [email protected]
 
Well thats just the way things sometimes work in a freemarket economy. If aloha can't compete then its just the way things go. The government can't and shouldn't be allowed to do anything.
 
Well thats just the way things sometimes work in a freemarket economy. If aloha can't compete then its just the way things go. The government can't and shouldn't be allowed to do anything.

Uh huh and if Walmart decided to give away its products for free just in one state, just long enough to see its competition go out of business, that's just a free market economy.
 
Well thats just the way things sometimes work in a freemarket economy. If aloha can't compete then its just the way things go. The government can't and shouldn't be allowed to do anything.

Hey SuperScooter,

Have you ever heard of predatory pricing? It's considered anti-competitive and illegal in most countries, including the United States due to the antitrust laws.
 
Uh huh and if Walmart decided to give away its products for free just in one state, just long enough to see its competition go out of business, that's just a free market economy.

True enough, unless you have prior confidential information from those currently in the market place.

The US is a nation of laws. The courts will ultimately sort this out. The question is whether the current operators will fail before the cases are decided.

I am disgusted by what appears to be a total lack of integrity on the part of those who had the opportunity to see CONFIDENTIAL information from both operators and potential operators in the intra-state market.

Bob
 
Well thats just the way things sometimes work in a freemarket economy. If aloha can't compete then its just the way things go. The government can't and shouldn't be allowed to do anything.

Clueless.
 
Better hope Faris is more interested in this case than he was in HAL vs. go!
 
No airline I have ever heard of has set price levels at an unsustainable level, and bragged about coping with the associated losses for 5 years. (Especially after unsuccessfully attempting to acquire the competition in Bankruptcy). On top of that, company emails have surfaced which show the true nature of MAG's hawaii venture (which indeed was to drive AQ out of the market and pick up their market share). So dork (aptly named) show me another example of one, or any of these. The airline market is highly competitive in America, yet I have not heard of Jetblue, or Airtran, or SWA, or UAL, (etc.) charging prices (other than introductory) which will not, and can not make them a profit.
 
No airline I have ever heard of has set price levels at an unsustainable level, and bragged about coping with the associated losses for 5 years. (Especially after unsuccessfully attempting to acquire the competition in Bankruptcy). On top of that, company emails have surfaced which show the true nature of MAG's hawaii venture (which indeed was to drive AQ out of the market and pick up their market share). So dork (aptly named) show me another example of one, or any of these. The airline market is highly competitive in America, yet I have not heard of Jetblue, or Airtran, or SWA, or UAL, (etc.) charging prices (other than introductory) which will not, and can not make them a profit.

Are you serious? UAL, NWA and DAL didn't charge prices (other than introductory) that did not and could not make them a profit?
 
Are you serious? UAL, NWA and DAL didn't charge prices (other than introductory) that did not and could not make them a profit?

Example? Mesa has admitted that at the current fare structure they can't make money. Show me where UAL, NWA, and DAL are losing money on routes while flying full.

The topper with this case is, they have emails from MAG executives admitting that the true plan was to drive one of the local companies out of business. This is a clear case of predatory pricing. I guess ultimately, it has to do with motive.
 
Last edited:
well, i guess we can scratch superkooter off the list of people who might have a clue as to the difference between a freemarket economy and what we have in the US. he's also off the list of people that might know what anti-trust laws are about.
 
Faris shouldn't be presiding over this because this suit wasn't filed in the Bankruptcy Court.

I just reviewed the lawsuit myself and it is very different from Hawaiian's lawsuit.

Looks like Mesa was sued by Aloha in State court (not bankruptcy court) so Aloha can pursue criminal penalties. I have just found the entire lawsuit on www.dontflygo.com the direct link to the lawsuit is http://www.dontflygo.com/documents/AQvYVComplaint.pdf

My sources say Aloha won't back down from this lawsuit for anything. Bethune and Burkle are going for JO's jugular.

If I was Ornstein I would find a excuse real quick to re-deploy those aircraft someplace else, anywhere else.

Didn't one of the BOD at Mesa resign just the day before this lawsuit was filed? I also hear that he was an Air Force General with old ties to Hawaii. He may have been tipped off about the criminal charges.

The way I understand it, the entire Mesa BOD and their management may be going to jail over this if Aloha wins which is all but assured.

Heres a cool quote from the Honolulu Advertiser on Saturday.

Scott Hamilton, a Washington state-based aviation industry consultant, estimated that go! would have to charge about $69 for each one-way interisland trip to break even. That's about 77 percent more than the $39 one-way fares currently charged by go! and more than three times the $19 lowest-ever fare offered by the airline.[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1] "Unless Mesa sells seats at $69, everything is below cost," he said.
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1]

Hamilton added that Mesa faces major financial exposure if Aloha prevails in the suit.
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1]

Aloha's suit did not specify the amount of monetary damages suffered by Aloha, but it did ask that it be awarded triple the amount should it prevail.


[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1] Hamilton cited a ruling by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Faris earlier this month in Hawaiian's suit against Mesa. Faris denied Hawaiian's request for a preliminary injunction barring go! from operating interisland flights for a year, but Hawaiian is still seeking damages from Mesa. The judge also said "the evidence (in the Hawaiian case) raises real doubts about the propriety of Mesa's conduct" and that "at one time, Mesa hoped to drive Aloha out of business."


[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1] Based on that ruling, Hamilton believes that Aloha could easily claim that it suffered $100 million in damages as a result of Mesa's actions. That means that Mesa could be on the hook for as much as $300 million should a judge rule in Aloha's favor and award treble damages, he said.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1]"That wipes out much of the cash reserves of Mesa. ... In theory, this could put Mesa out of business," Hamilton said. "Based on what happened in the bankruptcy court ruling with Hawaiian Airlines, Ornstein should be on Banmiller's doorstep with a check asking what it would cost to make this go away."[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1]

[/SIZE][/FONT]The funny thing about this quote is if you know Scott Hamilton, he doesn't like David Banmiller at all. That makes this quote EXTREMELY UNBIASED.
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE][/FONT]
 
Faris shouldn't be presiding over this because this suit wasn't filed in the Bankruptcy Court.

Actually, I believe Hawaiian got exactly what they wanted out of this deal. It's my understanding that that they didn't expect to win this case, but they have paved the way to sue and win damages. Judging by the comments that the Judge made, it looks like it's not if they will get awarded damages in April, but how much. What Mesa did was illegal and now it's in the courts. Mesa may very well have met it's Waterloo in Hawaii.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top