Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA closer to a strike

  • Thread starter Thread starter SiuDude
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 50

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
When Comair was on strike no Skywest pilot flew struck work. Should be the same this time. By the way, our management seems to be in a real hurry to get our pay talks finished. A little bird says people up high are meeting with lowly pilots to hammer something out. Guess their feeling the crunch to get something done in the next 30 days. Time will tell. http://skywestalpa.org/
http://skywestalpa.org/
http://skywestalpa.org/
http://skywestalpa.org/
http://skywestalpa.org/
http://skywestalpa.org/

I like your Avatar there friend.
 
Can the mediator just say NO?

What are the guidelines he follows in making such a decision?

It just seems if it were as simple as "ask and ye shall receive" we would have asked a long time ago.
 
I think (and probably am wrong) but we have been building a case for this for some time. We (the CNC) has been accumulating notes and records and memos etc etc to show the lack of progress that has been made. This along with the mediators own experince in these negotiations will hopefully lead him to agree to the request for arbitration.
Hopefully he will and we can get this show on the road!
 
- I'm ready to strike for a fair and industry leading contract - as much as anything at our end of the industry can be considered "leading." I was just pointing out that the process isn't as simple as some here are making it seem.
Fly safe.


Is it possible to get fair AND leading? Can the two co-exist?

Fair in who's eyes?
 
Is it possible to get fair AND leading? Can the two co-exist?

Fair in who's eyes?

Yes, it is, due to the terrible pay in the regional industry.

If ASA got a 5-7% payraise we would be industry leading or close to it. Do you honestly think that a 5-7% payraise would not be fair?

I would like a 20% payraise, but that is not reasonable nor fair. But I do feel that regional pilots deserve better pay and I'm willing to take a stand for it.
 
FINAL AWARDS​
POSITION NOTICE # 06-14​
1-CO ID Seniority NAME Effective Date EFF A/C EFF SEAT EFF DOM​

 
Fair vs. Resonable

Is it possible to get fair AND leading? Can the two co-exist?

Fair in who's eyes?

sweptback said:
Yes, it is, due to the terrible pay in the regional industry.

If ASA got a 5-7% payraise we would be industry leading or close to it. Do you honestly think that a 5-7% payraise would not be fair?

I would like a 20% payraise, but that is not reasonable nor fair. But I do feel that regional pilots deserve better pay and I'm willing to take a stand for it.

Not fair, but more like resonable....I agree with swept...Alpa knows we aren't going to get a 20% raise and so does the pilot group. That's just an opening, just like mgmt's crap proposal. Like buying a car or house, the trick is meeting somewhere in the middle at terms both parties can live with. I think the mec is ready to deal, however mgm't doesn't seem to want to give up anything in return.

Most everyone around here just wants a decent payraise along with industry standard QOL verbage that most all other carriers have. I just want the contract to be finished(but not at the expense of caving for something mediocore) so we can move on and focus on doing a good job, fixing ATL and growing the ASA/Skywest team. All the guys going around saying that Jerry is going to dismantle ASA are wrong in my opinion. He didn't buy ASA, a hugely profitable carrier, just to dismantle it to teach the pilot union a lesson. He's a smart manager in business to MAKE MONEY for his shareholders....ASA and Skywest are doing a lot of that right now and will continue to in the future.
 
Yes. Worthless signs off on the Mesa contrat knowing the downward pressure it would create for all us, then expects a lot of Pilots to lose their jobs fighting that very contract HE approved.



ALPA Nat. is an abortion.
 
Whatever pay raise ASA pilots get, will almost immediately be offset by a higher contribution to health care costs....mark my words.

You fellas need to concentrate on QOL, and alternate ways to make a buck rather than straight hourly rate (rigs, Open time at 1.5 pay, etc.)

Of course, the real answer is to build another career in your spare time, then tell ASA to go fu.ck themselves.
 
Not fair, but more like resonable....I agree with swept...Alpa knows we aren't going to get a 20% raise and so does the pilot group. That's just an opening, just like mgmt's crap proposal. Like buying a car or house, the trick is meeting somewhere in the middle at terms both parties can live with. I think the mec is ready to deal, however mgm't doesn't seem to want to give up anything in return.

Most everyone around here just wants a decent payraise along with industry standard QOL verbage that most all other carriers have. I just want the contract to be finished(but not at the expense of caving for something mediocore) so we can move on and focus on doing a good job, fixing ATL and growing the ASA/Skywest team. All the guys going around saying that Jerry is going to dismantle ASA are wrong in my opinion. He didn't buy ASA, a hugely profitable carrier, just to dismantle it to teach the pilot union a lesson. He's a smart manager in business to MAKE MONEY for his shareholders....ASA and Skywest are doing a lot of that right now and will continue to in the future.
ALPA has NOT come off the initial rate request....ASA HAS! If ALPA would give ANY AT ALL, I feel certain ASA would move even more. ALPA isn't moving, ALPA isn't being reasonable. The proposal ASA has passed IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ME! So, don't even go there! However, ALPA's stance is NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ME EITHER!

It's time, past time really, for ALPA to get real and find the middle ground that we ALL know exists and get this thing done before we lose even more planes and flying.

You say "ASA is more profitable than SkyW" and "ASA pilots make less than SkyW", I BELIEVE YOU!!!!!

ASA is still losing planes, routes amd domiciles to SkyW. Blame that on whatever you like. It's still a FACT.

Get it done ALPA. NOW.
 
ALPA has NOT come off the initial rate request....ASA HAS! If ALPA would give ANY AT ALL, I feel certain ASA would move even more. ALPA isn't moving, ALPA isn't being reasonable. The proposal ASA has passed IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ME! So, don't even go there! However, ALPA's stance is NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ME EITHER!

You are misinformed. ALPA has come off their initial rate proposal.
 
ALPA has NOT come off the initial rate request....ASA HAS! If ALPA would give ANY AT ALL, I feel certain ASA would move even more. ALPA isn't moving, ALPA isn't being reasonable. The proposal ASA has passed IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ME! So, don't even go there! However, ALPA's stance is NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ME EITHER!

It's time, past time really, for ALPA to get real and find the middle ground that we ALL know exists and get this thing done before we lose even more planes and flying.

You say "ASA is more profitable than SkyW" and "ASA pilots make less than SkyW", I BELIEVE YOU!!!!!

ASA is still losing planes, routes amd domiciles to SkyW. Blame that on whatever you like. It's still a FACT.

Get it done ALPA. NOW.

Ditto, ALPA has come down amost 50% on their initial proposal of Comair +1% and has more room to negotiate. ASA has come up what 1.5%. That's movement? And don't tell me that coming up from a paycut to current payrates is movement, cause it's not.

The last payrate proposal from the company was not really the problem IMO. The PBS tied to a crappy Perf. Plus, lack of SCOPE, etc.... was the problem. You think that payrates was the only thing keeping the gap so wide? Yeah right.

IMHO, the 30 day cooling off period and super mediated negotiations are the only way to get this done. Cause neither side wants a strike. Put a time limit on them and it will get done. I saw it at TSA in 2000 and it will take the same thing here.
 
Last edited:
The last payrate proposal from the company was not really the problem IMO. The PBS tied to a crappy Perf. Plus, lack of SCOPE, etc.... was the problem. You think that payrates was the only thing keeping the gap so wide? Yeah right.

IMHO, the 30 day cooling off period and super mediated negotiations are the only way to get this done. Cause neither side wants a strike. Put a time limit on them and it will get done. I saw it at TSA in 2000 and it will take the same thing here.
I agree on all counts here.
IMO, alpa's unreasonable pay request and continued insistance on retirement are huge roadblocks. IMO, trade those for slightly more pay and rigs: deal gets done in a way we ALL can live with.
 
I agree on all counts here.
IMO, alpa's unreasonable pay request and continued insistance on retirement are huge roadblocks. IMO, trade those for slightly more pay and rigs: deal gets done in a way we ALL can live with.

Give me the better retirement options rather than perf plus and as I said before I don't think the pay is the roadblock.

Give me the way to make more money, ie credits like SKW, and I would be good. PBS will come but at the benifit of both sides not just the company. PBS touches so many other sections other than scheduling.

The company won't even address Retro pay and that is HUGE roadblock for A LOT of pilots!
 
So what's the timeline here? The way I understand this, if either party says NO to the proffer for binding arbitration, then the 30-day cool off starts immediately.

But is there a deadline for either side to say YES or NO to the proffer/binding arbitration process, or is there a potential to stall here?

If both sides say YES to the proffer, is there then a deadline for coming up with a contract, or is there no firm deadline?
 
Give me the better retirement options rather than perf plus and as I said before I don't think the pay is the roadblock.

Give me the way to make more money, ie credits like SKW, and I would be good. PBS will come but at the benifit of both sides not just the company. PBS touches so many other sections other than scheduling.

The company won't even address Retro pay and that is HUGE roadblock for A LOT of pilots!
again, I agree with all that with the exception of alpa payrates being a roadblock. they are simply too high and alpa has not budged on them. those rates WILL NOT FLY. come off those and drop the retirement bs for better 401k match and IMO we'll get a deal done sooner rather than later.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top