Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Yank Prater Now. Dump Alpa

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
To quote Jimmy Kimmel at the Flavor Flav roast...



"Did the whores do something?"

"Yes... that will change the perception about you...."

"maybe another season of charm school is order"



"Anyway... where was I before I was interupted by those whores"

Don't quit your "day job" (current position) although it's futile. Sadly, corruption is a disease and ALPA is terminal...............now back to the word processor Mr. ALPA secretary and watch those slippery Herndon roads.

.......and remember, the "fix" is in !
 
Sounds like the majority of people here are finally starting to realize that ALPA is a business that cares about making money. Very good, give yourself a pat on the back. This is something I learned long ago. Sound familiar? Maybe kind of like your own greedy executive board at your airline? Its the same story at ALPA as it is elsewhere, money, money, money.
 
"Anyway... where was I before I was interupted...."[/quote]

OK REZ,

No more interruptions, you have the floor. I just have a question since it appears you are well versed in ALPA goings-on (hopefully above and beyond "Flying the Line 1/2" and cut/paste airmail pilot pics from Vol 1)

1. Did the ALPA membership, once polled, agree to increasing age 60?
 
WRONG. (insert game show LOSER buzzer)




(audeince laughing so hard. Jay Leno thinks... get her for "jaywalking"). Buzzer operator finally stops laughing and hits the LOSER buzzer...



[wrong buzzer.....) Alec Trebac is shaking his head!




judges? partial credit!!



Judges? (wrong buzzer)! attractive answer but there never was a majority... its not ALPA hasn't been truthful... its just the members don't bother to know the truth...




WINNER!! bells whistles, ballons streamers!

Johnny...tell him what he's won.

(in announcer voice). He's won reality. And in this current world.. that's a good thing....


Nothing's changed... to segway off the last quote...

From Flying the Line, Vol. 1, page 227:


Rez your so full of sh1t you must be Pater himself.

FU
 
Rez, I agree with you on some things but I'm starting to think that if Prater was caught sucking Steenland off while Doug Parker did him up the a$$ and Jon Ornstein gave him a golden shower, you'd blame it on ALPA membership for not being involved enough.
 
Any tool who quotes "flying the line" complete with page number has absolutely zero credibility with a huge majority of his pilot peers.

can you say "Prater's Peter-Puller?"
 
1. Did the ALPA membership, once polled, agree to increasing age 60?[/quote]


Only about 50% even bothered to fill out the poll.
 
ALPA isn't the problem, Prater is. ALPA is just a democratic construct. What matters is who is in the positions of leadership and power within that construct. Remember, up until the dimwits elected Prater, ALPA was staunchly anti-65. Under Duane's leadership, ALPA fought aggressively to keep the current age limit, just as the membership demanded. That should make it apparent to you all that ALPA itself isn't the problem, the problem is who was elected. Now, who is to blame for that? The membership!!! The members screamed for Duane's head on a platter, and they got it. They blamed Duane for things out of his control, demanded that he be held responsible, and then put an inferior into office. How's that worked out for all of you? People like me and Rez warned you that Prater didn't have a clue what he was doing when he was running for office, but you still screamed "anybody but Duane!" Well, now "anybody but Duane" has fu*&ed you. Instead of blaming the organization, how 'bout you fix the actual problem? Get rid of Darth Prater! If you don't have the votes on the BOD to recall him (and I don't think you do, unfortunately), then start looking for someone to replace him at the end of his term. (And this time, actually get someone competent. Might I suggest.....Duane Woerth!!!!!!)
 
None of you guys will do anything except cry on this board. The older guys know how to get things done. When ALPA was against age 65 they formed their own groups and bought lobbyist. Then they took over ALPA. What the young guys have to figure out is nobody is going to do it for you. Typing posts on flight info does nothing. Writing letters to your congressmen does about the same. The old guys just showed how the minority, when motivated, can control the outcome.

Get involved. Paying dues is not enough.

"Nobody is going to do it for you". Hah, thats a laugh riot. You know, not everyone is a politician, but they all pay their taxes. Telling someone their opinion, or letter of opinion in this matter, has no worth unless they "get involved" and that they should not rely on someone else (say, an elected official), is like telling a voter their opinion at a city council meeting has no merit because they didn't volunteer for the beach clean-up committee, or whatever. I paid my taxes, I voted your a*^ in because I like what you represent, now don't tell me I am an idiot because I didn't go beyond voting and taxes/dues by "doing my part".

If I hear one more ALPA warrior use this tired old "get involved or shut your mouth" tactic, I am going to scream (wait, I already did that). The ALPA locals may be democracies, but national, more and more, appears not to be. Churches are democracies too (well, most are) so are the parishioners supposed to "be involved" in the church in order to offer an opinion during monthly governance meetings? I think not. UH OH! I hear an ALPA warrior yelling and shaking his fist at me crying "how does a church have anything in common with this subject!" :) Sorry, couldn't resist. I'm used to that one, but of course, I am involved with my ALPA so perhaps that is why I at least get listened to during meetings and not shunned.

Pay the taxes, get a voice. Pay the dues, get a voice. It should be that simple.

By the way, the minority overturning a majority is not the practice of democracy. At best, it is the practice of kleptocracy (the wealth of governing body is allocated amongst the populace but with favorance toward the wealthiest, i.e., most influential) and at worst the practice of a totalitarian-democracy (i.e. "benevolent presidents" to the likes of Chile and at one time Iraq) where citizens have the right to vote, but the ruling class or president has sweeping powers to decide "what is best" for citizens.
 
Last edited:
At least the APA has a pair:

www.alliedpilots.org said:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT:
Gregg Overman
Allied Pilots Association
817-302-2250/817-312-3901

PILOT RETIREMENT AGE POLL: PUBLIC URGES CAUTION

Fort Worth, Texas (December 12, 2007)—The Allied Pilots Association,
collective bargaining agent for the 12,000 pilots of American Airlines, issued the
following prepared statement today:

“This week the U.S. House of Representatives voted to increase airline pilot
retirement age from 60 to 65. Companion legislation is now pending in the Senate.

“The Allied Pilots Association—which represents the 12,000 pilots of American
Airlines, the nation’s largest passenger carrier—has commissioned an outside polling
firm to survey U.S. adults on pilot retirement age. Results so far indicate that an
overwhelming majority of Americans have serious safety concerns about any increase in
the retirement age and favor further study.

“Similarly, our pilots support age 60 retirement by a seven-to-one margin for
safety reasons. We should heed their professional judgment. After all, pilots are in the
best position to ascertain the effects of aging on their own stamina and skills and on those
of their fellow pilots.

“In response to the public’s concerns and our pilots’ own views, we urge
lawmakers to refrain from passing into law any increase in pilot retirement age. Instead,
the Federal Aviation Administration should be permitted to proceed with a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking for a full vetting of this issue.

“The United States has long set the worldwide standard for aviation safety and
should preserve its leadership role. The reality is no one knows what would happen with
large numbers of 65-year-old pilots in the cockpits of modern commercial airliners
operating in today’s demanding environment. The data doesn’t exist because it would be
unprecedented. Prudence therefore dictates that we proceed with caution.

“For safety’s sake, it’s the right thing to do.”
 
Rez, I agree with you on some things but I'm starting to think that if Prater was caught sucking Steenland off while Doug Parker did him up the a$$ and Jon Ornstein gave him a golden shower, you'd blame it on ALPA membership for not being involved enough.

Quote of the Year !!!!!!!!



Yeah, TRASH !!!
 
Last edited:
Whine...complain..whine...complain...on Flightinfo.com

Meanwhile, a year from now, John Prater will still be the President of ALPA....betcha...
 
"Takin' it back..........from the junior pilots!"
 
Meanwhile, a year from now, John Prater will still be the President of ALPA....betcha...

If he's not, he won't care because he got what he wanted.

The funny thing in all this is that in the last 10 years, I can't think of one thing that ALPA has had go in their favor when dealing with the govt., courts, or management. It's a heck of a time for the union to become effective.:smash:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom