Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Woman wins $27.5M in suit against Southwest

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Vastly Underemp said:
Actually, you CAN sue the federales, you just have to ask nicely first.
Technically, any time you attempt to sue anyone at any level of court system or attempt as a prosecutor to get criminal charges brought before a judge, you have to ask nicely first. That's what initial court procedure is all about.

If you didn't see the video that was part of that CFI who got busted for attempting to meet a 14 year old for sex, by flying into Marshfield Mass, you missed the part where they showed the prosecutor asking the judge to hear the case based on evidence the prosecutor possessed on the incident. Yes, the prosecutor was nicely asking the judge to hear the trial.
 
Whether or not she should have won her case, that's arguable. But c'mom... $27.5M... WTF is the legal system smoking!?! You just gotta shake your head and groan at this sort of shizznit.
 
That is funny...

I clicked on the article and right adjacent to it is another headline:
"Iran says it will cut off the hands of aggressors"

This woman of Iranian decent has her feelings hurt and is awarded $27.5 million!?

What a crazy world.
 
Echopapa said:
blzr said:
Um...no. You cannot sue the Federal government. quote]

Wrong.

You can sue the Fed Govmnt...

For those (few) who care...You can only sue the gov't for what they say you can sue them for. The gov't enjoys "sovereign immunity” which prohibits its citizens from suing. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act (and similar state acts) the gov’t has permitted itself to be sued for certain specific things, but not nearly all the stuff you can sue … say McDonald’s … for. The “Ferris Doctrine” which covers the “can’t sue the military” issue is another thing altogether.

Speaking of the McD’s coffee case. Those who tout that as a case of the legal system run amok fail to mention that Mc D’s was serving coffee at a temperature that causes 2nd and 3d degree burns to human flesh in under four seconds. They knew that, but made a “business decision” that it was cheaper to keep doing that and pay out burn claims than to reduce the temp of their coffee (???). The jury verdict (which took into account the plaintiff’s contributory stupidity), represented only 2 days worth of Mc D’s coffee sales.
 
frmrBUFFdrvr said:
Good that they will raise prices? That's a brilliant statement.

You apparently are not smart enough to understand my brilliance. Thats ok, few are!

I am tired of depressed fares industry wide in order to keep pace with Southworst.

There seems to be no middle ground on fares. If you buy 14 days in advance you get less than 200 buck fares roundtrip nationwide. If you buy less than 14 days out you are paying 500 to 1000. It makes no sense.

As far as the iranian, they oughta throw her down there in gitmo. Then we can get all the human rights libs off our backs by saying hey, now at least they can get some ass.
 
keep in mind, she was awarded this by a jury of her peers. So the better question is not wtf is up with the system, but wtf is up with that jury. But yes, i would agree that the system is afu also
 
munson said:
keep in mind, she was awarded this by a jury of her peers. So the better question is not wtf is up with the system, but wtf is up with that jury. But yes, i would agree that the system is afu also

People who know they will never have such power again and abuse it. That jury should be brought up on charges!
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top