pilotyip
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 13,629
different view
Remember I am management, as if training is really management, by unemployment. I take a different view, having lived through that age. By allowing a company to survive jobs were saved high paying jobs at that. The union knew there would be limits to their demands. When mutual aid went away, a company was now forced to settle on terms it could not afford, because it knew it would close the doors after X weeks. This particularly true now days where very little is owned by an airline and everything is leased resulting in huge payments due almost daily. The result of this strike threat was to accept terms they could not live with and resulted in BK. The airlines hoped that somehow things would work out. As I said it is a different view, having worked at two privately held unions airline that are now out of business, I would be worried if I was a Spirit pilot in my mid 50’s. Thank you for your civil discord. BTW I have a lot of friends from JUS that work at Spirit, they do not have the best management team in the business. It could be a better place to work.He11, if that post doesn't show your management slant, I don't know what does. Killing mutual aid was an ALPA success. Mutual aid gave the shut down airline a source of revenue "to allow employees to stay out on strike a longer time.". As if that's a good thing? The RLA is so stacked in management's favor that the only recourse airline pilots have is the threat of a strike. How long has TSA been trying to get a contract, for example? Is that how the RLA should work? Mutual aid was yet ANOTHER tool in management's tool belt to screw over labor. Good thing it's gone.