Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Why people go to ERAU or UND?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

FlyingToIST

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
417
This is not a flame bait.. I am just trtying to understand why people would go to a very expensive university, get under a lot of debt and then end up CFI'ing no matter what..

I am a flight school owner and recently I had a conversation with a guy who was going to ERAU. I told him that it will cost him many more $$$$ to get his license.. He said he liked the structured environment of a university. When I told him that our program is not too bad and it will cost him half the money if he came to us, he just basically shrugged it off.

Is it the image, or just the promisses of guranteed interviews at the low times ?
What is it that makes you go to these schools?

Thanks..
 
Cuz, they're the "Best of the best of the best", and they know that they will get job offers from every major airline the day that they graduate! Don't you know that? ;)
 
My skydiving buddy's two kids went to UND and graduated. Neither of them have flown a plane since.

Which is kind of sad, considering their airline captain Grandpa paid the bill while flying past 60 as an FE at United.
 
erau was a way for me to get it all done (flying and 4 yr degree) wrapped in one package in a min amount of time (3 yrs). plus VA benefits and stud loans were easy to come by. took 10 yrs to pay off loans but still would do over again. no regrets about erau. it worked out just fine.:)
 
FN FAL said:
My skydiving buddy's two kids went to UND and graduated. Neither of them have flown a plane since.

Which is kind of sad, considering their airline captain Grandpa paid the bill while flying past 60 as an FE at United.


That is sad. I can't stand it when people squander their secondary edcuation (especially at an expensive school). They don't realize a lot of people don't get those opportunities.


As to the original poster, ERAU and UND have "the image". I used to want to goto a school like ERAU until I realized I can get the same education cheaper and closer to home.
 
I would bet it's the image. When you ask non-aviation people to name you a school with a good aviation program, the first thing that's going to come up is ERAU. People tend to associate name recognition with quality and so when making their college decision choose ERAU. (The fact that it's in Daytona probably also helps their decision too). That said, I can't figure out why on earth you would want to spend four years in GFK. I'll admit they have a flashy looking program, but I've been there twice, once in the dead of winter and once in may (it snowed in may) and am glad I didn't end up living there.

As much as I've bitched about where I'm going to school right now (And I'm still paying less as an out of state aviation major than I would if i had gone to Riddle), I'm going to graduate with more hours than a UND or ERAU guy, and I will have given a couple hundred hours of instruction (having been paid to do so) and have flown a turbine aircraft (at no expense to me). Was my general education any better than those schools? Maybe, but I'd venture it's probably pretty close either way. Did I get my money's worth? I'll argue yes.
 
Last edited:
Pugh said:
That is sad. I can't stand it when people squander their secondary edcuation (especially at an expensive school). They don't realize a lot of people don't get those opportunities.
If they had to work for it, I don't think they would have let it fall by the wayside.
 
WOW! Talk about ill informed. I graduated from UND with a B.S. in Engineering and a minor in "Professional Flight", along with my other degree I paid about 36K total for 6 years of school, all my license through CFI/CFII/MEI and 200 hours of flight time. I did it all with grants, scholarships, loans and working my arse off. I got to fly almost brand spanking new warriors, arrows, seminoles, barons and if I had stayed long enough a cheyenne. I went on to instruct for 2.5 years/1000 hours. Not a lot for 2.5 years but I did get hired at my first regional with 1200TT/300ME.

Was it because I went to UND, yup, is that a bad thing, nope. Did the training at UND make me a "better" pilot than a part 61 fella, no, but it did teach in a structured, disciplined way that it is what these airlines like. CRM training, transport category aircraft systems classes, aerodynamics classes etc. I would say I and most of my classmates, KNEW more about regs, aerodynamics, systems and crew concepts coming out of UND than someone coming out of a part 61 school. That isn't meant as a flame and I don't hold myself above anyone just simple numbers. I not only spent ground time with my CFI I spent hours a week in a classroom setting with retired USAir, NWA, and other mainline captains and retired military pilots teaching IFR rules, advanced aerodynamics, etc. I simply had a larger pool of knowledge to drink from and drank heavily I did.

UND did have internship programs with ACA (Indy Air) for a while and a lot of guys took advantage of it and did very well there. Places like Mesaba, Piedmont, Horizon used to hire at lower times than normal but lately the mins have been fairly standard with Eagle and Piedmont coming down to 500 or 600 TT with a couple hundred Multi.

Does UND have its flaws, sure it does. There are "management" type Lead instructors who don't understand the first thing about flying an airplane but those are few and far between. Some of the policies where born out of one or two students stupidity, things like that. All in all though the place is a great place to learn how to fly, extreme emphasis on safety, checklist usage, CRM concept, basic flying skills along with using the latest and greatest that GA technology has to offer. There are, the last time I was there, 8 single engine simulators (almost brand new) 4 120 degree Vis multiengine sims (seminole setup) and a lvl 6 CRJ sim. All are used in the curriculum and all are used very well. The CRJ sim is a new course and is mandatory (I dont agree with that one, but it is a business, gotta pay the bills) and is taught by guys/gals that have flown in the 121 world.

Now does all the fluff make UND any better than going to some 61 outfit and getting your ratings, absolutely not. It's all in what you want to get out of your training. Plus it is easier to get the money to finance your training through a university system than it is part 61. I probably paid 18 to 19K for all my flight training including ground time and sim time, sure thats a higher than I would pay on the street but I could have never made or loaned the money to earn all my ratings in 2 years. Plus after that I earned a job instructing at UND that paid 20 bucks an hour. Not shopping on Rodeo drive with that, but at least I made enough to pay rent and my loans and still have enough left over to have a beer now and then.

People whine and moan about GFK and the winters, well it keeps the wimps out and at least you can leave your doors unlocked in ND without fear of getting ripped off. And a little snow shoveling and wing sweeping never hurt anyone

Now as far as the guys who complain about the high costs, they are the ones who don't study, don't come prepared, and have to incomplete or do review lesson after review lesson. 10 hours of review lessons in a seminole is almost 2K. Those same people have done that through every flight course and with 5 flight courses (not including aerobatics, floatplane, tailwheel, etc) that adds up over time.

If you are the type that just wants to get by meeting ONLY the PTS mins, UND isnt the place for you, but if you want to actually learn how to FLY the airplane and operate in the enviroment check it out, and for those wimps that cant handle the cold we have satellite operations in Hawaii, Arizona, and North Carolina.
 
Why not?

I go because all my interests revolve around aviation.

I fly off campus, and am majoring in Safety Science, and might get another BS in Meteorology.

When I graduate..I hope to have had a good time, and have a couple different career paths to look forward too.

Its expensive, no doubt...but so are plenty of other universities.

So thats my reasoning.
 
no ofeense to the good erau people, but at every NIFA meet we would try to go shoot the $hit with them guys and they would look down their nose at us. like they are god gift to aviation or something. too bad we produced this years top pilot at nationals
 
Kream926 said:
no ofeense to the good erau people, but at every NIFA meet we would try to go shoot the $hit with them guys and they would look down their nose at us. like they are god gift to aviation or something. too bad we produced this years top pilot at nationals
Yeah..sorry for those types...It sucks havin them around.
 
Those are projected costs, not course min time costs. I, like most, did the courses in minimum times and the cost per hour was cheaper 5 years ago. That is the biggest problem, people have been slacking off so much lately that the averge course completion times have gone through the roof. Look at the private pilot cousre, 50 hours!!!!! 40 hours in the reg min and most should/can do it in those times. 27.5 hours for the Multi course, good grief the place has gone to hell in a handbasket.
 
DC8 Flyer said:
if you want to actually learn how to FLY the airplane and operate in the enviroment check it out, and for those wimps that cant handle the cold we have satellite operations in Hawaii, Arizona, and North Carolina.


Oh cool so you acutally get to learn to fly the plane in the air? Man I've been missin' out ;)
 
Pugh said:
Oh cool so you acutally get to learn to fly the plane in the air? Man I've been missin' out ;)
Hey, don't knock it...Riddle does a lot of VFR stuff on the ground. Takeoffs, landings, TAXIING, steep turns, s turns, stalls, etc...
 
DC8 Flyer hit every nail squarely on the head. He mirrored exactly in every category what my son went through at UND. It is a relatively inexpensive 4 year public university with out of state reciprocity of tuition for students from several states, and one can get a B.A. or a B.S. in any number of fields, including aviation related fields, but not limited to that at all.

When my son was a freshman at UND, one of his roommates was from Hawaii. He had never seen ice that was not in a cocktail glass. As soon as the snow came and the wind howled, he quit and went home. It does take some perseverance when you hail from warmer climates. But, my son grew up in Minnesota, and was totally acclimated to bad and cold weather six months of the year.

The school has a modern fleet with lots of modern sims. There is a distinct absence of “low-life” going to school there. He always said that the harsh winters tended to get rid of the riffraff.

Just like DC8 Flyer, when he got his degree after 4 years, he went to work for UND as an instructor, and in 2-1/2 years, he had 1300/250 and was hired at Comair in 1997. As I remember, his W-2 form while on staff at UND was around $24,000 a year…..more than he made as a rookie FO at Comair in 1997. He’s been a captain there since July of 2000, and has an income now that is quite respectable. His getting through college was a family effort just as if he’d gone to any other college in any other field. He worked at summer jobs, took part time work as a waiter in a Mexican restaurant during the school year, and his parents saved enough before he even left high school to allow his college costs to be paid in full by the time he graduated, and he had zero college loans to pay off. That would have been our goal if he’d wanted to be an accountant or an electrical engineer.
 
Flyingtoist. Gotta understand high school guidance counselors are largely morons, some kid asks about flying and they look at what they know- 4 year well advertised universities and bingo it is off to a big shiny school. Also if the kids high school sends a large percentage off to college then there is quite a bit of peer pressure to do the 'normal thing' ie attending a 4 yr school.
 
Pugh said:
Oh cool so you acutally get to learn to fly the plane in the air? Man I've been missin' out ;)

HAHA! Very funny! :p

And, 40 hours to solo! Oh dear gawd, those are the ones that drove me to drink, well drink even more anyway.! :cool:

This is only my opinion.

I think 50 hours is way too much for Private Pilot training. Not bashing those who take more time to do it, just saying UND/ERAU shouldn't be held out as big shiny expensive schools because people don't buckle down and do the work necessary to get through the courses. I realize it sometimes takes more for some to "get it" but 10 hours more as an AVERAGE is a lot considering the number of students that get through in 40 or 42 hours.

Just to put in perspective.

http://www.tradewind-aviation.com/tai/private_pilot.cfm

This is a flight school, part 61, near where I live. 30K for everything through MEI in a C172 and a PA44. No college degree, no job instructing afterwards and you have to finance it yourself.
 
Last edited:
I got my private from a decent FBO in Dallas in just over 2 weeks 35 hours on the nose....9 hours to solo, man that was a blistering pace. As far as school goes if I could do it all over again I would have gotten my CFI's from that nice little FBO and gone to community college for the first 2 years (off set some of those flight training loans) and then gone to a local DFW college/university to finish off my degree while instructing.

Now what I did varies a fuzz; went to college for 1 year before realizing I wanted to be a pilot. I transfered to a near by, but out of state university that had an aviation program. I am paying a little more but I do get in state tuition and get the beloved college experience. I am currently about to earn my teaching ticket and instruct for the remainder of college (1 1/2 years) until I graduate. I hope to graduate meeting 135 mins.
 
FlyingToIST said:
This is not a flame bait.. I am just trtying to understand why people would go to a very expensive university, get under a lot of debt and then end up CFI'ing no matter what..

I am a flight school owner and recently I had a conversation with a guy who was going to ERAU. I told him that it will cost him many more $$$$ to get his license.. He said he liked the structured environment of a university. When I told him that our program is not too bad and it will cost him half the money if he came to us, he just basically shrugged it off.

Is it the image, or just the promisses of guranteed interviews at the low times ?
What is it that makes you go to these schools?

Thanks..

People think ERAU is the 'ivy league' of aviation
 
I don't know how you can say 50 hours is too much.

50 hours is probably a better number than the bare minimum of 40...the extra experience may be worthwhile to a lot of people.

I finished at 40-42.
 
The thing is I really don't mind where people got their flying experience from...what matters is the individual and how they come out of that experience. Whether you went to a Mom and Pop 61 or UND, if you turn out to be arrogant, rude and generally a poor pilot you will get no repspect either way. A blanket statement like "Man I hate those UND/ERAU guys" IMO is ignorant. One of the most important things about choosing a college/flight school is finding one which fits you the best.
 
gkrangers said:
I don't know how you can say 50 hours is too much.

50 hours is probably a better number than the bare minimum of 40...the extra experience may be worthwhile to a lot of people.

I finished at 40-42.

You're misunderstanding what Im saying, and I didnt say it very well. Im saying in a place like UND or ERAU there really is no reason to go over 40 hours to get your private, there are simply too many resources available, easily and readily available, that most 61 schools just cant afford to have. With all those tools at the students disposal the MAJORITY that go well over the course mins are the ones that just don't care and mom and pop are footing the bill. This drives the course averages up and gives UND the label of being a high priced school when in reality it is fairly close to the same price as doing your training at most other places. But since UND has a shred of business ethics they publish average course times and not minimum course times (thus costs) to present a more realistic picture.

Now does going over course mins make you a slacker, of course not, its an individual student thing. From my 2+ years of instructing there and doing all stage checks through CFII progs, and CFI progs, the majority that came for a check with minimum time where the sharp ones, ie prepared, where as the majority with 10+ hours of "extra" time were the weaker ones.

One concept I hope you can get out of your mind before long is the "more time = more experience and thus a better pilot" attitude. Its the quality of instruction and what the student does with that instruction that determines their performance, not how many times they practice steep turns only to be 200 feet off every time because they have no idea what is happening to lift and drag while in the turn.

I guess what I am saying is, UND is no more high priced than your average FBO as far as per hour training costs go. Of course you will spend more with tuition, (especially out of state), room and board, books, simulator time, etc. But in the long run I think the trainng you get and the resources you have at your disposal at UND is worth it.

ps
For you ERAU guys that come up during the summer for competitions, how hard is it to find Truck Stop, its the only parking lot on the south side of town with 800 big rigs parked in it! :eek:
 
I don't believe I would be with Cathay Pacific if it were not for the knowlege gained at Embry Riddle. Just little things like understanding systems, aerodynamics, or weather a little better then the next guy got me through the interview. Having an answer to a obscure question or having just a little more situational awareness beacuse of my degree proves to be invaluable on a daily basis. Was it expensive, absolutly, but I think taking four years of classes in my EXACT career field truly helped my path end up in such an awesome place. Can you be a great pilot without a 4 year degree in aeronautics, of course, I meet them everyday, but for me personally I would not change a thing.
 
Erau '86-'90

I graduated ERAU in 1990 out of the management program.

I took flight lessons in So. Cal. during the summer.

I chose ERAU Prescott because:

1) It was close to home (LA).
2) Far enough away from home.
3) The student/teacher ratio was about 15:1
4) At the time (late '80s) it wasn't anymore expensive than any other private college.

Is it more expensive to fly there? Yes. That's why I took lessons at home.

All said, I think I received a pretty good undergraduate education. The people in the Humanities Dept made a conscious effort to balance the highly technical and focused nature of the core curriculum in order to produce a well rounded product.

If you're just looking for flights lessons, well yeah, that's dumb. But if you're looking for an education then you'll find one...if you want it.

And that's the problem. A lot of people approach ERAU as some sort of glorified trade school.

Different strokes for different folks.
Good luck.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom