Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
United says they are going to an Existing United Express carrier. Commutair, republic, Mesa, Skywest, TSA?
Skywest is definitely not getting the "Qs". They're going to RAH for sure.
You guys are like vultures circling a carcass. It's very unfortunate what's happening to Colgan and I for one hope they get to keep the Q's. Anyone flying those planes other than Colgan pilots will be benefiting from the loss of our fellow pilots. Good luck to the Colgan pilots, I hope something works out for you guys and you get to keep those planes and jobs.
By being cheaper.
This post brought to you by beta from my iPhone.
Skywest is definitely not getting the "Qs". They're going to RAH for sure.
Are you a communist? You sound like a socialist at best. Capitalism is the name of the game in the USA.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
You guys are like vultures circling a carcass. It's very unfortunate what's happening to Colgan and I for one hope they get to keep the Q's. Anyone flying those planes other than Colgan pilots will be benefiting from the loss of our fellow pilots. Good luck to the Colgan pilots, I hope something works out for you guys and you get to keep those planes and jobs.
You have my vote for "Douchiest Comment on Flight Info - 2012."Are you a communist? You sound like a socialist at best. Capitalism is the name of the game in the USA.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Agreed, at least about the SkyWest part. Jerry talked to our transition class the other day, and he was very, very adamant that SkyWest has ZERO interest in the Qs. He said they are mx hogs, and do not fit in with our plans. He said he has no idea where they're going, but it will not be SkyWest.
Well, thanks to this statement here are my revised predictions.
I give it 60/40 chance they go to one carrier or are split up.
My opinion of the chances of the recipient of the Q's:
65% C5
20% RAH
12.5% Mesa
2.5% TSA
Didn't Colgan take some of XJT flying when they started flying the Q's?
Who'd XJT get it from?
You guys are like vultures circling a carcass. It's very unfortunate what's happening to PINNACLE PILOTS and I for one hope they get to keep the Q's. Anyone flying those planes other than PINNACLE pilots will be benefiting from the loss of our fellow pilots. Good luck to the PINNACLE pilots, I hope something works out for you guys and you get to keep those planes and jobs.
CAL...because their pilots, like all the rest, we too good to fly RJ'S. All of XJT's original flying was organic. They were flying ATR'S, Bro's, and 1900's. When CAL pilots allowed scope of 50 seats jets, XJT came about as an ERJ operation. Do I feel for Colgan...sure, but they did take it from XJT because of cost. This is a defining moment in regional history. The cheapest failed. Going forward, management has lost the cost battle in negotiations. Being the cheapest means nothing! As a note, even though CAL pilots gave up 50 seat jets, they have held strong since. Good for them. Notice I said jets. Some mentioned the 50 seat issue with scope ....there is no scope on seats for PROPS at CAL. When scope was negotiated at CAL, Gordan Bethune idea was to have all jets at Express. Props were gone in his mind and the unions. The word props was not included because no one thought props would be an issue. As evidence, Express parked all of there props. Then Larry Kellner saw the loophole and filled it with Q's to squeeze both XJT and CAL ALPA. SkyWest aided him and then Jeff Smisek later by adding more pressure on both. CHQ was brought in when XJT management ate the shiiit and took 69 airplanes that CAL never thought they would do. In the end....XJT is owned by SKYW and still standing. CHQ and Colgan will be gone soon. The end result is the new United paying less for XJT but getting the same, if not larger service ....what they wanted in 2006. Well played management. That was a long whipsaw to get XJT cost down....but they succeeded.
Not saying this was United's plan, but they played the hands well. This is exactly why no union should ever use pilots to negotiate. The unions should use our dues for NEGOTIATORS. Lawyers, consultants, advisors...and so on. As long as unions sends pilots (who think they know how to negotiate) we will always loose. End of story. This is like sending the student counsel to Capital Hill to negotiate tax revenue for education.
This is a defining moment in regional history. The cheapest failed. Going forward, management has lost the cost battle in negotiations. Being the cheapest means nothing!