G2T
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Posts
- 447
For the money I would find myself in a new Baron.
I also experienced the eclipse, and for the money, I'm taking the jet. The price is the only thing comparable in these two aircraft.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the money I would find myself in a new Baron.
Guess it depends on what you are looking for. I have a feeling that the Eclipse is going to be a miantence pig.I also experienced the eclipse, and for the money, I'm taking the jet. The price is the only thing comparable in these two aircraft.
Guess it depends on what you are looking for. I have a feeling that the Eclipse is going to be a miantence pig.
What was your impression of the Eclipse? Where you let down by it? How many other light turbine aircraft do you have experience with?
Yes, I guess that if you are just looking for speed then the Eclipse wins. I dont know, like I said I would choose the Baron if it were me. Too each their own!It is what it is, the first model of a brand new airplane from a new company. It's not designed to be the fasted or biggest in class, but in comparison to a baron, pretty impressive performance. I have not flown many small turbine aircraft, so I don't have that to compare it to. It might lack in comparison to some of the other VLJ's, but it smokes the piston twin, for not that much more money.
I've crawled all over the Mustang and I really like it, especially because we already know it's pedigree.
The only plane I don't like is the Piperjet. There is just something about the engine being mounted on the tail that is rubbing me wrong.
Something not right about speedbrakes that double as landing gear.
I would like to see the Mustang in person, after seeing all of the pics, the Mustang gets my vote as far as looks go.